В статье представлен обзор нефропротективных свойств антагонистов кальция (АК), которые относятся к антигипертензивным препаратам первой линии. В настоящее время роль АК в терапии больных с хроническими заболеваниями почек до конца не определена, а полученная в клинических исследованиях информация об их ренопротективном действии достаточно противоречива. В обзоре показано, что влияние АК на функцию почек варьирует в зависимости от типа АК (дигидропиридиновый и недигидропиридиновый). Представлены гемо- и негемодинамические механизмы нефропротективного влияния АК. Обращается внимание на рациональное сочетание АК с блокаторами ренин-ангиотензин-альдостероновой системы. Описаны отличительные от «классических» АК особенности нефропротективного действия нового представителя АК – препарата лерканидипина и обозначены перспективы его применения в клинической практике.
The paper reviews the nephroprotective properties of calcium antagonists (CAs) that belong to first-line antihypertensive drugs. As of now, the role of CAs in therapy for chronic kidney diseases has not been completely defined and the data obtained from clinical trials of their renoprotective effects are rather ambiguous. The review shows that the effect of CAs on renal function varies with their type (dihydropyridine and nondihydropyridine). It describes the hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic mechanisms of their nephroprotective action Attention is given on that AC should be reasonably combined with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers. The nephroprotective effects of the new CA representative lercanidipine, which are distinct from those of classical CAs, are described and promises for its clinical application defined.
1. Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Roset E et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertesion 2009; 27: 2112–58.
2. Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet 2000; 356: 366–72.
3. The ALLHAT officers and coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative research group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97.
4. Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-Dehoff RM et al. A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil–Trandolapril Study (INVEST), a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 2805–16.
5. Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with valsartan – or amlodipine – based regimens: VALUE, a randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 366–72.
6. Dalhöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendrofluazide as required, in Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 895–906.
7. Hansson L, Hedner T, Lund-Johansen P et al. Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and β-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study. Lancet 2000; 356: 359–65.
8. Robles NR. Calcium Antagonists and renal failure: new properties for new generations. Med Hypotheses Res 2006; 3: 709–25.
9. Borghi C. Lercanidipine in hypertension. Vascular Health and Risk Management 2005; 1 (3): 173–82.
10. Klag MJ, Whelton PK, Randall BL et al. Blood pressure and end-stage renal disease in men. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 13–8.
11. Herbette LG, Gaviraghi G, Tulenko T, Mason RP. Molecular interaction between lacidipine and biological membranes. J Hypertens 1993; Suppl. 11: S13–19.
12. Reams GP, Bauer JH. Acute and chronic effects of calcium antagonists on the essential hypertensive kidney. In: Epstein M. and Loutzenhiser R. (EDITORS), Calcium Antagonists and the Kidney. Philadelphia. Hanley & Belfus 1990: 247–56.
13. Kon V, Fogo A and Ichikawa I. Bradykinin causes selective efferent arteriolar dilation during angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibition. Kidney Int 1993; 44: 545–50.
14. Ichikawa I. Will angiotensin II receptor antagonists be renoprotective in humans? Kidney Int 1996; 50: 684–92.
15. Sabbatini M, Leonardi A, Testa R et al. Effect of Calcium Antagonists on Glomerular Arterioles in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Hypertension 2000; 35: 775–9.
16. Sugiura T, Imai E, Moriyama T et al. Calcium channel blockers inhibit proliferation and matrix production in rat mesangial cells: Possible mechanism of suppression of AP-1 and CREB activities. Nephron 2000; 85: 71–80.
17. Roth M, Keul R, Emmons LR et al. Manidipine regulates the transcription of cytokine genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 4071–5.
18. Hayashi M, Yamaji Y, Nakazato Y, Saruta T. The effects of calcium channel blockers on nuclear factor kappa B activation in the mesangial cells. Hypertens Res 2000; 23: 521–5.
19. Epstein M. Calcium antagonists and renal protection: emerging perspectives. J Hypertens 1998; 18 (Suppl. 4): S17–S25.
20. Carmines PK, Navar LG. Disparate effects of Ca channel blockers on afferent and efferent arteriolar responses to ANG II. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: F1015–F20.
21. Loutzenhiser R, Epstein M. Renal hemodynamic effects of calcium antagonists. In: Epstein M and Loutzenhiser R (EDITORS). Calcium Antagonists and the Kidney. Philadelphia. Hanley & Belfus 1990: 33–74.
22. Fleming JT, Parekh N, Steinhausen M. Calcium antagonists preferentially dilate preglomerular vessels of hydronephrotic kidney. Am J Physiol 1987; 253: F1157–F63.
23. Arima S, Ito S, Omata K et al. Diverse effects of calcium antagonists on glomerular hemodynamics. Kidney Int 1996; 55 (Suppl.): S132–S4.
24. Hayashi K, Ozawa Y, Fujiwara K et al. Role of actions of calcium antagonists on efferent arterioles – with special references to glomerular hypertension. Am J Nephrol 2003; 23: 229–44.
25. Dworkin LD, Tolbert E, Recht PA et al. Effects of amlodipine on glomerular filtration, growth, and injury in experimental hypertension. Hypertension 1996; 27: 245–50.
26. Harris DC, Hammond WS, Burke TJ, Schrier RW. Verapamil protects against progression of experimental chronic renal disease. Kidney Int 1987; 31: 41–6.
27. Dworkin LD, Feiner HD, Parker M, Tolbert E. Effects of nifedipine and enalapril on glomerular structure and function in uninephrectomized SHR. Kidney Int 1991; 9: 1112–7.
28. Wenzel UO, Troschau G, Schoeppe W et al. Adverse effect of the calcium channel blocker nitrendipine on nephrosclerosis in rats with renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 1992; 20: 233–41.
29. Bakris GL, Mangrum A, Copley JB et al. Effect of Calcium Channel or β-Blockade on the Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy in African Americans. Hypertension 1997; 29: 744–50.
30. THE PROCOPA STUDY GROUP. Dissociation between blood pressure reduction and fall in proteinuria in primary renal disease: A randomized doubleblind trial. J Hypertension 2002; 20: 729–37.
31. Voyaki SM, Staessen JA, Thijs L et al. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) Trial Investigators. Follow-up of renal function in treated and untreated older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 511–9.
32. National Intervention Cooperative Study in Elderly Hypertensives. Randomized double-blind comparison of a calcium antagonist and a diuretic in elderly hypertensives. Hypertension 1999; 34: 1129–33.
33. Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet 2000; 356: 366–72.
34. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihyperten-sive and Lipid Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97.
35. Baba S and J-MIND Study Group. Nifedipine and enalapril equally reduce the progression of nephropathy in hypertensive Type 2 diabetics. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2001; 54: 191–201.
36. Marin R, Ruilope LM, Aljama P et al. A random comparison of fosinopril and nifedipine GITS in patients with primary renal disease. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 1871–6.
37. Fogari R, Preti P, Zoppi A et al. Effects of amlodipine fosinopril combination on microalbumnuria in hypertensive Type 2 diabetic patients. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 1042–9.
38. Shigihara T, Sato A, Hayashi K, Saruta T. Effect of combination therapy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus calcium channel blocker on urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive microalbuminuric patients with Type II diabetes. Hypertens Res 2000; 23: 219–26.
39. Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Loriga G et al. The REIN-2 Study Group. Blood pressure control for renoprotection in patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease (REIN-2): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 939–46.
40. Yokoyama S and Kaburagi T. Clinical effects of intravenous nifedipine on renal function. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1983; 5: 67–71.
41. Wallia R, Greenberg A and Puschett JB. Renal hemodynamic and tubular transport effects of nitrendipine. J Lab Clin Med 1985; 105: 498–503.
42. Ozawa Y, Hayashi K, Oka K et al. Divergent action of calcium antago-nists on the efferent arteriole (abstract). J Hypertens 1998; 16 (Suppl. 2): S27.
43. Hansen PB, Jensen BL, Andreasen D, Skøtt O. Differential expression of T- and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels in renal resistance vessels. Circ Res 2001; 89: 630–38.
44. Takakura S, Furuichi Y, Yamamoto T et al. Effects of nilvadipine on the development of neurological deficits in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stroke 1994; 25: 677–82.
45. Shudo C, Masuda Y, Sugita H et al. Effects of efonidipine, nicardipine and captopril on proteinuria in aged spontaneously hypertensive rats. Arzneimittel-Forsch 1996; 46: 852–4.
46. Fujimaki M, Nagase M and Uchida S. Long-term effect of manidipine on renal function and structure in uninephrectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1997; 24: 506–12.
47. Vestra MD, Pozza G, Vosca A et al. Effect of lercanidipine compared with ramipril on albumin rate in hypertensive Type 2 diabetic with microalbuminuria: DIAL Study (Diabete, Ipertensione, Albuminuria, Lercanidipina). Diab Nutr Metab 2004; 17: 259–66.
48. Hayashi K, Ozawa Y, Fujiwara K et al. Role of actions of calcium antagonists on efferent arterioles – with special references to glomerular hypertension. Am J Nephrol 2003; 23: 229–44.
49. Robles NR, Ocon J, Gomez Campderá F et al. Lercanidipine in chronic renal failure patients: The ZAFRA Study. Renal Failure 2005; 27: 73–80.
Авторы
М.Г.Бубнова
ФГУ Государственный научно-исследовательский Центр профилактической медицины Минздравсоцразвития РФ, Москва mbubnova@gnicPM.ru
________________________________________________
M.G.Bubnova
State Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health and Social Development of the RF, Moscow mbubnova@gnicPM.ru