Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения. Авторизуйтесь или зарегистрируйтесь.
Купирование фибрилляции предсердий на догоспитальном и стационарном этапах с позиций доказательной медицины
________________________________________________
Miller O.N., Tarasov A.V., Dik I.S., Belyaeva I.E. Atrial fibrillation management on prehospital and in-hospital phases, based on the principles of evidence-based medicine. Consilium Medicum. 2016; 18 (10): 8–18. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2016.10.8-18
Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения. Авторизуйтесь или зарегистрируйтесь.
Ключевые слова: фибрилляция предсердий, синусовый ритм, антиаритмические препараты.
________________________________________________
Key words: atrial fibrillation, sinus rhythm, antiarrhythmic drugs.
2. Татарский Б.А., Баталов Р.Е., Попов С.В. Фибрилляция предсердий: патофизиологические подходы к выбору антиаритмической терапии. Томск: STT, 2013. / Tatarskii B.A., Batalov R.E., Popov S.V. Fibrilliatsiia predserdii: patofiziologicheskie podkhody k vyboru antiaritmicheskoi terapii. Tomsk: STT, 2013. [in Russian]
3. Van Gelder IC, Brugemann J, Crijns HJ. Current treatment recommendations in antiarrhythmic therapy. Drugs 1998; 55 (3): 331–46.
4. Von Besser K, Mills AM. Is discharge to home after emergency department cardioversion safe for the treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation? Ann Emerg Med 2011; 58: 517–20.
5. Bjerkelund CJ, Orning OM. The efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in preventing embolism related to D.C. electrical conversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 208–16.
6. Arnold AZ, Mick MJ, Mazurek RP et al. Role of prophylactic anticoagulation for direct current cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 851–5.
7. Fatkin D, Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW et al. Transesophageal echocardiography before and during direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: evidence for 'atrial stunning' as a mechanism of thromboembolic complications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 307–16.
8. Falcone RA, Morady F, Armstrong WF. Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial appendage function and spontaneous contrast formation after chemical or electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 435–9.
9. Bellotti P, Spirito P, Lupi G et al. Left atrial appendage function assessed by transesophageal echocardiography before and on the day after elective cardioversion for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1998; 8: 1199–202.
10. Harjai K, Mobarek S, Abi-Samra F et al. Mechanical dysfunction of the left atrium and the left atrial appendage following cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and its relation to total electrical energy used for cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 1125–9.
11. Sparks PB, Jayaprakash S, Vohra JK et al. Left atrial 'stunning' following radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 468–75.
12. Mitusch R, Garbe M, Schmucker G et al. Relation of left atrial appendage function to the duration and reversibility of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 944–7.
13. Manning WJ, Silverman DI, Katz SE et al. Temporal dependence of the return of atrial mechanical function on the mode of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 624–6.
14. Grimm RA, Leung DY, Black IW et al. Left atrial appendage 'stunning' after spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation demonstrated by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J 1995; 1 (30): 174–6.
15. Black IW, Fatkin D, Sagar KB et al. Exclusion of atrial thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography does not preclude embolism aftercardioversion of atrial fibrillation. A multicenter study. Circulation 1994; 89: 2509–13.
16. Berger M, Schweitzer P. Timing of thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter: a retrospective analysis. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1545–7.
17. Collins LJ, Silverman DI, Douglas PS et al. Cardioversion of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Reduced thromboembolic complications with 4 weeks of precardioversion anticoagulation are related to atrial thrombus resolution. Circulation 1995; 92: 160–3.
18. Goette А, Honeycutt С, Langberg JJ. Electrical remodelling in atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1996; 94 (7): 2968–74.
19. Sra J, Zaidi ST, Krum D et al. Correlation of spontaneous and induced premature atrial complexes initiating atrial fibrillation in humans: electrophysiologic parameters for guiding therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001; 12 (12): 1347–52.
20. Van Gelder IC, Brugemann J, Crijns HJ. Current treatment recommendations in antiarrhythmic therapy. Drugs 1998; 55 (3): 331–46.
21. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/early/ 2014/04/10/CIR.
22. Сулимов В.В. Медикаментозное лечение нарушений ритма сердца. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2011; с. 409–16. / Sulimov V.V. Medikamentoznoe lechenie narushenii ritma serdtsa. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2011; s. 409–16. [in Russian]
23. Khan IA. Single oral loading dose of propafenonefor pharmacological cardioversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 542–7.
24. Boriani G, Martignani C, Biffi M et.al. Oral loading with propafenone for oral conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. A review of in-hospital treatment. Drugs 2002; 62: 415–23.
25. Naccarelli GV, Walbrette DL, Khan M et al. Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation. Comparative efficacy and results of trials. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91 (Suppl.): 15D–26D.
26. Rresco C, Proclemer A. Clinical challenge II. Management of recent onset atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 1996; 17 (Suppl. C): 41–7.
27. Conti A, Del Taglia B, Mariannini Y et al. Management of patients with acute atrial fibrillation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28: 903–10.
28. Kosior DA, Kochanowski V, Scislo P et al. Efficacy and tolerability of oral propafenone versus quinidine in the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation. A randomized, prospective study. Cardiol J 2009; 16: 521–7.
29. Balla I, Petrela E, Kondili A. Pharmacological conversion of recent atrial fibrillation: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of three antiarrhythmic drugs. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2011; 11 (7): 600–6.
30. Sestito A, Molina E. Atrial fibrillation and the pharmacological treatment: the role of propafenone. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012; 16 (2): 242–53.
31. Boriani G, Biffi M, Capucci A et al. Oral propafenone to convert recent-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with and without underlying heart disease. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 621–4.
32. Capucci A, Villiani G, Aschieri D. Safety of oral propafenone in the convertion of recept-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a prospective parallel placebo – controlled multicentred study. Int J Cardiol 1999; 68: 187–96.
33. Antonelli D, Darawsha A, Rimbrot S et al. Propafenone dose for emergency room conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Harefuah 1999; 136 (11): 857–915.
34. Khan IA. Single oral loading dose of propafenone for pharmacological cardioversionofrecent-onsetatrial fibrillation. JACC 2001; 37: 542–7.
35. Alboni P, Botto GL, Baldi N et al. Outpatient treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with the “pill-in-the-pocket” approach. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2384–91.
36. Deneer VH, Borgh MB, Kingma JH et al. Oral antiarrhythmic drugs in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation. Pharm World Sci 2004; 26 (2): 66–78.
37. Bunin YА, Anfalova L. Efficacy of propafenone as single oral loading dose in pharmacology converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Europace 2005; 7 (Suppl. 1): 121–2.
38. Фомина И.Г., Таризманова А.И., Ветлужский А.В. и др. Пропафенон при восстановлении синусового ритма у больных с персистирующей формой фибрилляции предсердий. «ПРОМЕТЕЙ» – открытое, мультицентровое, пилотное исследование в Российской Федерации. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2005; 4: 65–9. / Fomina I.G., Tarizmanova A.I., Vetluzhskii A.V. i dr. Propafenon pri vosstanovlenii sinusovogo ritma u bol'nykh s persistiruiushchei formoi fibrilliatsii predserdii. “PROMETEI” – otkrytoe, mul'titsentrovoe, pilotnoe issledovanie v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Kardiovaskuliarnaia terapiia i profilaktika. 2005; 4: 65–9. [in Russian]
39. Boriani G, Capucci A, Lenzi T et al. Propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. A controlled comparison between oral loading dose and intravenous administration. Chest 1995; 108: 355–8.
40. Botto G, Bonini W, Broffoni T et al. Randomized, crossover, controlled comparison of oral loading versus intravenous infusion of propafenone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 2480–84.
41. Bianconi L, Mennuni M. Comparison between propafenone and digoxin administered intravenously to patients with acute atrial fibrillation. PAFIT-3 Investigators. The Propafenone in Atrial Fibrillation Italian Trial. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82 (5): 584–8.
42. Tieleman RG, Gosselink AT, Crijns HJ et al. Efficacy, safety, and determinants of conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with oral amiodarone. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 53–7.
43. Alboni P, Botto GL, Baldi N et al. Outpatient treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with the “pill-in-the-pocket” approach. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2384–91.
44. Zipes DP. Management of cardiac arrhytmias: Parmacological, electrical and surgical techniques. In: E Braunwald (ed) Heart disease-5th edition. Philadelphia, 1997; p. 593–639.
45. Feld GK. Atrial fibrillation. Is there a safe and highly effective pharmacological treatment? Circulation 1990; 82: 2248–50.
46. Leitch JW, Klein GJ, Yee R et al. Prognostic value of electrophysiology testing in asymptomatic patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern. Circulation 1990; 82: 1718–23.
47. Vardas PE, Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE et al. Amiodarone as a first-choice drug for restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled study. Chest 2000; 1 (17): 1538–45.
48. Martinez-Marcos FJ, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Ortega-Carpio A et al. Comparison of intravenous flecainide, propafenone, and amiodarone for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 950–3.
49. Chevalier P, Durand-Dubief A, Burri H et al. Amiodarone versus placebo and class IС drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41 (2): 255–62.
50. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Solomou MC et al. Efficacy of amiodarone for the termination of persistent atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 58–61.
51. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Parthenakis F et al. Amiodarone versus propafenone for conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: results of a randomized, controlled study. J Am Colt Cardiol 1999; 33: 966–71.
52. Singh BN, Singh SN, Reda DJ et al. Amiodarone versus Sotalol for Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1861–72.
53. Galperin J, Elizari MV, Chiale PA et al. Efficacy of amiodarone for the termination of chronic atrial fibrillation and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double blind trial. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2001; 6: 341–50.
54. Bertini G, Conti A, Fradella G et al. Propafenone versus amiodarone in field treatment of primary atrial tachydysrhythmias. J Emerg Med 1990; 8: 15–20.
55. Kerin NZ, Faitel K, Naini M. The efficacy of intravenous amiodarone for the conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone vs. quinidine for conversion of atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 49–53.
56. Юричева Ю.А., Соколов С.Ф., Голицын С.П. и др. Новый антиаритмический препарат III класса ниферидил как эффективное средство восстановления синусового ритма при персистирующей форме мерцательной аритмии. Вестн. аритмологии. 2012; 70: 32–43. / Iuricheva Iu.A., Sokolov S.F., Golitsyn S.P. i dr. Novyi antiaritmicheskii preparat III klassa niferidil kak effektivnoe sredstvo vosstanovleniia sinusovogo ritma pri persistiruiushchei forme mertsatel'noi aritmii. Vestn. aritmologii. 2012; 70: 32–43. [in Russian]
57. Stoschitzky K, Stoschitzky G, Lercher P et al. Propafenone shows class Ic and class II antiarrhythmic effects. Europace 2016; 18 (4): 568–71.
58. Halpern SW, Ellroot G, Singh BN, Mandel WJ. Efficacy of intravenous procainamid infusion in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Relation to left atrium size. Brit Heart J 1980; 44: 589–95.
59. Fenster PE, Comess KA, Marsh A et al. Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm by acute intravenous procainamide infusion. Am Heart J 1983; 106: 501–4.
60. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Solomou MC et al. Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using acute intravenous procainamide infusion. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1998; 12: 75–81.
61. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Hamilos ME et al. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of procainamide versus propafenone versus amiodarone for the conversion of recent-onsetatrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 1721–25.
62. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Symington C et al. Emergency department use of intravenous procainamide for patients with acute atrial fibrillation or flutter. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14: 1158–64.
63. Singh S, Saini RK, DiMarco J et al. Efficacy and safety of sotalol in digitalized patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. The Sotalol Study Group. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1227–30.
64. Vos MA, Golitsyn SR, Stangl K et al. Superiority of ibutilide (a new class III agent) over DL-sotalol in converting atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. The Ibutilide/Sotalol Comparator Study Group. Heart 1998; 79: 568–75.
65. Hohnloser SH, Van De Loo A, Baedeker F. Efficacy and proarrhythmic hazards of pharmacologic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: prospective comparison of sotalol versus quinidine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 852–8.
66. Halinen MO, Huttunen M, Paakkinen S et al. Comparison of sotalol with digoxin-quinidine for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm (the Sotalol-Digoxin-Quinidine Trial). Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 495–8.
67. Noc M, Stajer D, Horvat M. Intravenous amiodarone versus verapamil for acute conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 679–80.
68. Intravenous digoxin in acute atrial fibrillation. Results of a randomized, placebocontrolled multicentre trial in 239 patients. The Digitalis in Acute Atrial Fibrillation (DAAF) Trial Group. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 649–54.
69. Barroffio R, Tisi G, Guzzini F et al. A randomised study comparing digoxin and propafenone in the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation. Clin Drug Invest 1995; 9: 277–83.
70. Hou ZY, Chang MS, Chen CY et al. Acute treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter with a tailored dosing regimen of intravenous amiodarone. A randomized, digoxin-controlled study. Eur Heart J 1995; 16: 521–8.
71. Jordaens L. Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and rate control by digoxin in comparison to placebo. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 643–8.
72. ESC guidelines 2011 on management of cardiovascular disease during pregnancy. Doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr 218.
73. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 230–68.
74. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management о patients with valvular heart disease JACC 1998; 32 (5): 1486–588.
75. Schmitt J, Duray G, Gersh BJ, Hohnloser SH. Atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of the incidence, clinical features and prognostic implications. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1038–45.
76. Crystal E, Garfinkle MS, Connolly SS et al. Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 4: CD003611.
77. Nemati MH, Astaneh B. Amiodarone Versus Propafenone to Treat Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 49 (3): 177–84.
78. Prystowsky EN. Inpatient versus outpatient initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy for patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Clin Ciol Clin Cardiol 1994; 17 (9 Suppl. 2): 117–10.
________________________________________________
1. Ruksin V.V. Kratkoe rukovodstvo po neotlozhnoi kardiologii. SPb: InformMed, 2010. [in Russian]
2. Tatarskii B.A., Batalov R.E., Popov S.V. Fibrilliatsiia predserdii: patofiziologicheskie podkhody k vyboru antiaritmicheskoi terapii. Tomsk: STT, 2013. [in Russian]
3. Van Gelder IC, Brugemann J, Crijns HJ. Current treatment recommendations in antiarrhythmic therapy. Drugs 1998; 55 (3): 331–46.
4. Von Besser K, Mills AM. Is discharge to home after emergency department cardioversion safe for the treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation? Ann Emerg Med 2011; 58: 517–20.
5. Bjerkelund CJ, Orning OM. The efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in preventing embolism related to D.C. electrical conversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 208–16.
6. Arnold AZ, Mick MJ, Mazurek RP et al. Role of prophylactic anticoagulation for direct current cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 851–5.
7. Fatkin D, Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW et al. Transesophageal echocardiography before and during direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: evidence for 'atrial stunning' as a mechanism of thromboembolic complications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 307–16.
8. Falcone RA, Morady F, Armstrong WF. Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial appendage function and spontaneous contrast formation after chemical or electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 435–9.
9. Bellotti P, Spirito P, Lupi G et al. Left atrial appendage function assessed by transesophageal echocardiography before and on the day after elective cardioversion for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1998; 8: 1199–202.
10. Harjai K, Mobarek S, Abi-Samra F et al. Mechanical dysfunction of the left atrium and the left atrial appendage following cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and its relation to total electrical energy used for cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 1125–9.
11. Sparks PB, Jayaprakash S, Vohra JK et al. Left atrial 'stunning' following radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 468–75.
12. Mitusch R, Garbe M, Schmucker G et al. Relation of left atrial appendage function to the duration and reversibility of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 944–7.
13. Manning WJ, Silverman DI, Katz SE et al. Temporal dependence of the return of atrial mechanical function on the mode of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 624–6.
14. Grimm RA, Leung DY, Black IW et al. Left atrial appendage 'stunning' after spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation demonstrated by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J 1995; 1 (30): 174–6.
15. Black IW, Fatkin D, Sagar KB et al. Exclusion of atrial thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography does not preclude embolism aftercardioversion of atrial fibrillation. A multicenter study. Circulation 1994; 89: 2509–13.
16. Berger M, Schweitzer P. Timing of thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter: a retrospective analysis. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1545–7.
17. Collins LJ, Silverman DI, Douglas PS et al. Cardioversion of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Reduced thromboembolic complications with 4 weeks of precardioversion anticoagulation are related to atrial thrombus resolution. Circulation 1995; 92: 160–3.
18. Goette А, Honeycutt С, Langberg JJ. Electrical remodelling in atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1996; 94 (7): 2968–74.
19. Sra J, Zaidi ST, Krum D et al. Correlation of spontaneous and induced premature atrial complexes initiating atrial fibrillation in humans: electrophysiologic parameters for guiding therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001; 12 (12): 1347–52.
20. Van Gelder IC, Brugemann J, Crijns HJ. Current treatment recommendations in antiarrhythmic therapy. Drugs 1998; 55 (3): 331–46.
21. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/early/ 2014/04/10/CIR.
22. Sulimov V.V. Medikamentoznoe lechenie narushenii ritma serdtsa. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2011; s. 409–16. [in Russian]
23. Khan IA. Single oral loading dose of propafenonefor pharmacological cardioversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 542–7.
24. Boriani G, Martignani C, Biffi M et.al. Oral loading with propafenone for oral conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. A review of in-hospital treatment. Drugs 2002; 62: 415–23.
25. Naccarelli GV, Walbrette DL, Khan M et al. Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation. Comparative efficacy and results of trials. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91 (Suppl.): 15D–26D.
26. Rresco C, Proclemer A. Clinical challenge II. Management of recent onset atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 1996; 17 (Suppl. C): 41–7.
27. Conti A, Del Taglia B, Mariannini Y et al. Management of patients with acute atrial fibrillation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28: 903–10.
28. Kosior DA, Kochanowski V, Scislo P et al. Efficacy and tolerability of oral propafenone versus quinidine in the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation. A randomized, prospective study. Cardiol J 2009; 16: 521–7.
29. Balla I, Petrela E, Kondili A. Pharmacological conversion of recent atrial fibrillation: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of three antiarrhythmic drugs. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2011; 11 (7): 600–6.
30. Sestito A, Molina E. Atrial fibrillation and the pharmacological treatment: the role of propafenone. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012; 16 (2): 242–53.
31. Boriani G, Biffi M, Capucci A et al. Oral propafenone to convert recent-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with and without underlying heart disease. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 621–4.
32. Capucci A, Villiani G, Aschieri D. Safety of oral propafenone in the convertion of recept-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a prospective parallel placebo – controlled multicentred study. Int J Cardiol 1999; 68: 187–96.
33. Antonelli D, Darawsha A, Rimbrot S et al. Propafenone dose for emergency room conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Harefuah 1999; 136 (11): 857–915.
34. Khan IA. Single oral loading dose of propafenone for pharmacological cardioversionofrecent-onsetatrial fibrillation. JACC 2001; 37: 542–7.
35. Alboni P, Botto GL, Baldi N et al. Outpatient treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with the “pill-in-the-pocket” approach. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2384–91.
36. Deneer VH, Borgh MB, Kingma JH et al. Oral antiarrhythmic drugs in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation. Pharm World Sci 2004; 26 (2): 66–78.
37. Bunin YА, Anfalova L. Efficacy of propafenone as single oral loading dose in pharmacology converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Europace 2005; 7 (Suppl. 1): 121–2.
38. Fomina I.G., Tarizmanova A.I., Vetluzhskii A.V. i dr. Propafenon pri vosstanovlenii sinusovogo ritma u bol'nykh s persistiruiushchei formoi fibrilliatsii predserdii. “PROMETEI” – otkrytoe, mul'titsentrovoe, pilotnoe issledovanie v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Kardiovaskuliarnaia terapiia i profilaktika. 2005; 4: 65–9. [in Russian]
39. Boriani G, Capucci A, Lenzi T et al. Propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. A controlled comparison between oral loading dose and intravenous administration. Chest 1995; 108: 355–8.
40. Botto G, Bonini W, Broffoni T et al. Randomized, crossover, controlled comparison of oral loading versus intravenous infusion of propafenone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 2480–84.
41. Bianconi L, Mennuni M. Comparison between propafenone and digoxin administered intravenously to patients with acute atrial fibrillation. PAFIT-3 Investigators. The Propafenone in Atrial Fibrillation Italian Trial. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82 (5): 584–8.
42. Tieleman RG, Gosselink AT, Crijns HJ et al. Efficacy, safety, and determinants of conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with oral amiodarone. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 53–7.
43. Alboni P, Botto GL, Baldi N et al. Outpatient treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with the “pill-in-the-pocket” approach. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2384–91.
44. Zipes DP. Management of cardiac arrhytmias: Parmacological, electrical and surgical techniques. In: E Braunwald (ed) Heart disease-5th edition. Philadelphia, 1997; p. 593–639.
45. Feld GK. Atrial fibrillation. Is there a safe and highly effective pharmacological treatment? Circulation 1990; 82: 2248–50.
46. Leitch JW, Klein GJ, Yee R et al. Prognostic value of electrophysiology testing in asymptomatic patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern. Circulation 1990; 82: 1718–23.
47. Vardas PE, Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE et al. Amiodarone as a first-choice drug for restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled study. Chest 2000; 1 (17): 1538–45.
48. Martinez-Marcos FJ, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Ortega-Carpio A et al. Comparison of intravenous flecainide, propafenone, and amiodarone for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 950–3.
49. Chevalier P, Durand-Dubief A, Burri H et al. Amiodarone versus placebo and class IС drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41 (2): 255–62.
50. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Solomou MC et al. Efficacy of amiodarone for the termination of persistent atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 58–61.
51. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Parthenakis F et al. Amiodarone versus propafenone for conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: results of a randomized, controlled study. J Am Colt Cardiol 1999; 33: 966–71.
52. Singh BN, Singh SN, Reda DJ et al. Amiodarone versus Sotalol for Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1861–72.
53. Galperin J, Elizari MV, Chiale PA et al. Efficacy of amiodarone for the termination of chronic atrial fibrillation and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double blind trial. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2001; 6: 341–50.
54. Bertini G, Conti A, Fradella G et al. Propafenone versus amiodarone in field treatment of primary atrial tachydysrhythmias. J Emerg Med 1990; 8: 15–20.
55. Kerin NZ, Faitel K, Naini M. The efficacy of intravenous amiodarone for the conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone vs. quinidine for conversion of atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 49–53.
56. Iuricheva Iu.A., Sokolov S.F., Golitsyn S.P. i dr. Novyi antiaritmicheskii preparat III klassa niferidil kak effektivnoe sredstvo vosstanovleniia sinusovogo ritma pri persistiruiushchei forme mertsatel'noi aritmii. Vestn. aritmologii. 2012; 70: 32–43. [in Russian]
57. Stoschitzky K, Stoschitzky G, Lercher P et al. Propafenone shows class Ic and class II antiarrhythmic effects. Europace 2016; 18 (4): 568–71.
58. Halpern SW, Ellroot G, Singh BN, Mandel WJ. Efficacy of intravenous procainamid infusion in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Relation to left atrium size. Brit Heart J 1980; 44: 589–95.
59. Fenster PE, Comess KA, Marsh A et al. Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm by acute intravenous procainamide infusion. Am Heart J 1983; 106: 501–4.
60. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Solomou MC et al. Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using acute intravenous procainamide infusion. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1998; 12: 75–81.
61. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Hamilos ME et al. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of procainamide versus propafenone versus amiodarone for the conversion of recent-onsetatrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 1721–25.
62. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Symington C et al. Emergency department use of intravenous procainamide for patients with acute atrial fibrillation or flutter. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14: 1158–64.
63. Singh S, Saini RK, DiMarco J et al. Efficacy and safety of sotalol in digitalized patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. The Sotalol Study Group. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1227–30.
64. Vos MA, Golitsyn SR, Stangl K et al. Superiority of ibutilide (a new class III agent) over DL-sotalol in converting atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. The Ibutilide/Sotalol Comparator Study Group. Heart 1998; 79: 568–75.
65. Hohnloser SH, Van De Loo A, Baedeker F. Efficacy and proarrhythmic hazards of pharmacologic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: prospective comparison of sotalol versus quinidine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 852–8.
66. Halinen MO, Huttunen M, Paakkinen S et al. Comparison of sotalol with digoxin-quinidine for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm (the Sotalol-Digoxin-Quinidine Trial). Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 495–8.
67. Noc M, Stajer D, Horvat M. Intravenous amiodarone versus verapamil for acute conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 679–80.
68. Intravenous digoxin in acute atrial fibrillation. Results of a randomized, placebocontrolled multicentre trial in 239 patients. The Digitalis in Acute Atrial Fibrillation (DAAF) Trial Group. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 649–54.
69. Barroffio R, Tisi G, Guzzini F et al. A randomised study comparing digoxin and propafenone in the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation. Clin Drug Invest 1995; 9: 277–83.
70. Hou ZY, Chang MS, Chen CY et al. Acute treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter with a tailored dosing regimen of intravenous amiodarone. A randomized, digoxin-controlled study. Eur Heart J 1995; 16: 521–8.
71. Jordaens L. Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and rate control by digoxin in comparison to placebo. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 643–8.
72. ESC guidelines 2011 on management of cardiovascular disease during pregnancy. Doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr 218.
73. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 230–68.
74. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management о patients with valvular heart disease JACC 1998; 32 (5): 1486–588.
75. Schmitt J, Duray G, Gersh BJ, Hohnloser SH. Atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of the incidence, clinical features and prognostic implications. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1038–45.
76. Crystal E, Garfinkle MS, Connolly SS et al. Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 4: CD003611.
77. Nemati MH, Astaneh B. Amiodarone Versus Propafenone to Treat Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 49 (3): 177–84.
78. Prystowsky EN. Inpatient versus outpatient initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy for patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Clin Ciol Clin Cardiol 1994; 17 (9 Suppl. 2): 117–10.
1 ГБОУ ВПО Новосибирский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России. 630091, Россия, Новосибирск, Красный пр-т, д. 52;
2 ФГБУ Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины Минздрава России. 101990, Россия, Москва, Петроверигский пер., д. 10, стр. 3;
3 ЗАО Медицинский центр «Авиценна» группы компаний «Мать и дитя». 630004, Россия, Новосибирск, пр-т Димитрова, д. 7;
4 ГБУЗ НСО Городская клиническая больница №34. 630054, Россия, Новосибирск, ул. Титова, д. 18
*miller.olga@list.ru
________________________________________________
1 Novosibirsk State Medical University. 630091, Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, Krasnyi pr-t, d. 52;
2 State Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 101990, Russian Federation, Moscow, Petroverigskii per., d. 10, str. 3;
3 Medical center "Avicenna" group of companies "Mother and child". 630004, Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, pr-t Dimitrova, d. 7;
4 City Clinical Hospital №34. 630054, Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, ul. Titova, d. 18
*miller.olga@list.ru