Современное состояние проблемы транскатетерного репротезирования клапанов сердца по методике «клапан-в-клапан»
Современное состояние проблемы транскатетерного репротезирования клапанов сердца по методике «клапан-в-клапан»
Имаев Т.Э., Комлев А.Е., Колегаев А.С. и др. Современное состояние проблемы транскатетерного репротезирования клапанов сердца по методике «клапан-в-клапан». Consilium Medicum. 2016; 18 (5): 89–92. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2016.5.89-92
________________________________________________
Imaev T.E., Komlev A.E., Kolegaev A.S. et al. The current status of transcatheter heart valve replacement, using the valve-in-valve technique. Consilium Medicum. 2016; 18 (5): 89–92. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2016.5.89-92
Современное состояние проблемы транскатетерного репротезирования клапанов сердца по методике «клапан-в-клапан»
Имаев Т.Э., Комлев А.Е., Колегаев А.С. и др. Современное состояние проблемы транскатетерного репротезирования клапанов сердца по методике «клапан-в-клапан». Consilium Medicum. 2016; 18 (5): 89–92. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2016.5.89-92
________________________________________________
Imaev T.E., Komlev A.E., Kolegaev A.S. et al. The current status of transcatheter heart valve replacement, using the valve-in-valve technique. Consilium Medicum. 2016; 18 (5): 89–92. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2016.5.89-92
Методика транскатетерного протезирования клапанов сердца, широко используемая в клинической практике в настоящее время, нашла свое применение и в проблеме повторного протезирования. Транскатетерное репротезирование клапанов сердца подразумевает имплантацию биопротеза «клапан-в-клапан» и на сегодняшний день является единственным методом, который позволяет существенно снизить риски оперативного лечения. Ниже описаны основные принципы планирования процедуры имплантации «клапан-в-клапан», а также современное состояние проблемы и перспективы развития данного направления.
Ключевые слова: аортальный клапан, митральный клапан, репротезирование клапана, техника «клапан-в- клапан», пациенты высокого хирургического риска, транскатетерное протезирование аортального клапана,транскатетерная имплантация аортального клапана, биологические протезы клапанов сердца, повторная операция на сердце, структурные заболевания сердца, транскатетерное протезирование митрального клапана.
________________________________________________
Transcatheter heart valve replacement is widely used in clinical practice, and this technic founds the application in repeated valve replacements nowadays. Transcatheter heart valve re-replacement is a procedure of valve-in-valve implantation into a deteriorated bioprosthesis and is the only method which can significantly reduce the risk of surgical treatment, nowadays. The article describes the basic principles in the planning of valve-in-valve implantation, as well as the current status of the problem and the prospects for the development of this direction.
1. Raval J, Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Denniss AR. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review of Literature. Heart, Lung and Circulation 2014; 23: 1020–8.
2. Gurvitch R, Cheung A, Wood DA et al. Transcatheter. Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58 (21).
3. Bapat V, Mydin I, Chadalavada S et al. A Guide to Fluoroscopic Identification and Design of Bioprosthetic Valves: A Reference for Valve-in-Valve Procedure. Cathet Cardiovasc Int DOI 10.1002/ccd.
4. Piazza N, Bleiziffer S, Brockmann G et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Failing Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2011; 4 (7): 721–32.
5. Piazza N, Bleiziffer S, Brockmann G et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Failing Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve: From Concept to Clinical Application and Evaluation (Part 2). JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011; 4 (7): 733–42.
6. Descoutures F, Himbert D, Maisano F et al. Transcatheter valve-in-ring implantation after failure of surgical mitral repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 44 (1): e8–15.
7. Silberman S, Oren A, Dotan M. Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses. J Card Surg 2008; 23: 299–306.
8. Brown JM, O'Brien SM, Wu C et al. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 82–90.
9. Vogt PR, Brunner-LaRocca H, Sidler P. Reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses: predictors for emergency surgery and reoperative mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 17: 134–9.
10. Jones JM, O'Kane H, Gladstone DJ. Repeat heart valve surgery: risk factors for operative mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122: 913–8.
11. Ruel M, Kulik A, Rubens FD. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 364–70.
12. Jaussaud N, Gariboldi V, Giorgi R. Risk of reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis dysfunction. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18: 256–61.
13. Wenaweser P, Buellesfeld L, Gerckens U, Grube E. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: the first valve in valve procedure using the CoreValve revalving system. Cathet Cardiovasc Int 2007; 70: 760–4.
14. Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Dreysse S et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation after previous aortic valve replacement: clinical proof of the ‘‘valve-in-valve’’ concept. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 270–7.
15. Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Linke A et al. Transapical off-pump valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic xenografts. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 1934–41.
16. Dvir D, Webb J, Brecker S et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: results from the global valve-in-valve registry. Circulation 2012; 126: 2335–44.
17. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guide-lines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the manage-ment of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Soci-ety of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: e1–e148.
18. Bruschi G, Barosi A, Colombo P et al. Direct transatrial transcatheter SAPIEN valve implantation through right minithoracotomy in a degenerated mitral bioprosthetic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1708–10.
19. Montorfano M, Latib A, Chieffo A et al. Successful Percutaneous Anterograde Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation in the Mitral Position. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011; 4: 1246–7.
20. Webb JG, Wood DA, Ye J et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic heart valves. Circulation 2010; 121: 1848–57.
21. Cheung AW, Gurvitch R, Ye J et al. Transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantations for a failed bioprosthesis: a case series. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141: 711–5.
________________________________________________
1. Raval J, Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Denniss AR. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review of Literature. Heart, Lung and Circulation 2014; 23: 1020–8.
2. Gurvitch R, Cheung A, Wood DA et al. Transcatheter. Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58 (21).
3. Bapat V, Mydin I, Chadalavada S et al. A Guide to Fluoroscopic Identification and Design of Bioprosthetic Valves: A Reference for Valve-in-Valve Procedure. Cathet Cardiovasc Int DOI 10.1002/ccd.
4. Piazza N, Bleiziffer S, Brockmann G et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Failing Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2011; 4 (7): 721–32.
5. Piazza N, Bleiziffer S, Brockmann G et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Failing Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve: From Concept to Clinical Application and Evaluation (Part 2). JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011; 4 (7): 733–42.
6. Descoutures F, Himbert D, Maisano F et al. Transcatheter valve-in-ring implantation after failure of surgical mitral repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 44 (1): e8–15.
7. Silberman S, Oren A, Dotan M. Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses. J Card Surg 2008; 23: 299–306.
8. Brown JM, O'Brien SM, Wu C et al. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 82–90.
9. Vogt PR, Brunner-LaRocca H, Sidler P. Reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses: predictors for emergency surgery and reoperative mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 17: 134–9.
10. Jones JM, O'Kane H, Gladstone DJ. Repeat heart valve surgery: risk factors for operative mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122: 913–8.
11. Ruel M, Kulik A, Rubens FD. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 364–70.
12. Jaussaud N, Gariboldi V, Giorgi R. Risk of reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis dysfunction. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18: 256–61.
13. Wenaweser P, Buellesfeld L, Gerckens U, Grube E. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: the first valve in valve procedure using the CoreValve revalving system. Cathet Cardiovasc Int 2007; 70: 760–4.
14. Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Dreysse S et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation after previous aortic valve replacement: clinical proof of the ‘‘valve-in-valve’’ concept. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 270–7.
15. Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Linke A et al. Transapical off-pump valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic xenografts. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 1934–41.
16. Dvir D, Webb J, Brecker S et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: results from the global valve-in-valve registry. Circulation 2012; 126: 2335–44.
17. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guide-lines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the manage-ment of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Soci-ety of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: e1–e148.
18. Bruschi G, Barosi A, Colombo P et al. Direct transatrial transcatheter SAPIEN valve implantation through right minithoracotomy in a degenerated mitral bioprosthetic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1708–10.
19. Montorfano M, Latib A, Chieffo A et al. Successful Percutaneous Anterograde Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation in the Mitral Position. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011; 4: 1246–7.
20. Webb JG, Wood DA, Ye J et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic heart valves. Circulation 2010; 121: 1848–57.
21. Cheung AW, Gurvitch R, Ye J et al. Transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantations for a failed bioprosthesis: a case series. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141: 711–5.
Институт клинической кардиологии им. А.Л.Мясникова ФГБУ Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава России. 121552, Россия, Москва, ул. 3-я Черепковская, д. 15а
*imaev.timur@mail.ru
A.L.Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiological Scientific-Industrial Complex of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 121552, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. 3-ia Cherepkovskaia, d. 15a
*imaev.timur@mail.ru