Эффективность и приемлемость влагалищной комбинированной гормональной системы, содержащей этинилэстрадиол и этоногестрел. Обзор литературы
Эффективность и приемлемость влагалищной комбинированной гормональной системы, содержащей этинилэстрадиол и этоногестрел. Обзор литературы
Межевитинова Е.А., Прилепская В.Н. Эффективность и приемлемость влагалищной комбинированной гормональной системы, содержащей этинилэстрадиол и этоногестрел. Обзор литературы. Гинекология. 2019; 21 (2): 6–11.
DOI: 10.26442/20795696.2019.2.190359
________________________________________________
Mezhevitinova E.A., Prilepskaya V.N. Efficacy and acceptability of the vaginal combination hormone system containing ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel.
Literature rewiev. Gynecology. 2019; 21 (2): 6–11.
DOI: 10.26442/20795696.2019.2.190359
Эффективность и приемлемость влагалищной комбинированной гормональной системы, содержащей этинилэстрадиол и этоногестрел. Обзор литературы
Межевитинова Е.А., Прилепская В.Н. Эффективность и приемлемость влагалищной комбинированной гормональной системы, содержащей этинилэстрадиол и этоногестрел. Обзор литературы. Гинекология. 2019; 21 (2): 6–11.
DOI: 10.26442/20795696.2019.2.190359
________________________________________________
Mezhevitinova E.A., Prilepskaya V.N. Efficacy and acceptability of the vaginal combination hormone system containing ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel.
Literature rewiev. Gynecology. 2019; 21 (2): 6–11.
DOI: 10.26442/20795696.2019.2.190359
Обзор посвящен оценке эффективности и приемлемости влагалищного кольца и комбинированных оральных контрацептивов (КОК) в сравнительном аспекте. Показано, что влагалищное кольцо обладает высокой эффективностью, сравнимой с КОК, лучшим контролем цикла, меньшим количеством побочных эффектов, удобно в применении, нет необходимости в ежедневном контроле за приемом таблеток.
The review focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of a vaginal ring and combined oral contraceptives (COC) in a comparative aspect. It is shown that the vaginal ring has high efficiency, comparable to COC, has better cycle control, fewer side effects, is convenient to use, there is no need for daily monitoring of the pill. Key words: vaginal ring, combined oral contraceptives, efficacy, acceptability, tolerance, compliance, microbiocenosis.
1. Руководство по контрацепции. Под ред. В.Н.Прилепской. Изд. 5-е, доп. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2018.
[Rukovodstvo po kontratseptsii. Pod red. V.N.Prilepskoi. Izd. 5-e, dop. Moscow: MEDpress-inform, 2018 (in Russian).]
2. Сакевич В.И. От аборта к контрацепции. Демоскоп Weekle. 2016; 687–88.
[Sakevich V.I. Ot aborta k kontratseptsii. Demoskop Weekle. 2016; 687–88 (in Russian).]
3. Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Медицинские критерии приемлемости методов контрацепции. ВОЗ, Европейское региональное бюро, 2015. ISBN 978-92-8-9052689
[Vsemirnaia organizatsiia zdravookhraneniia. Meditsinskie kriterii priemlemosti metodov kontratseptsii. VOZ, Evropeiskoe regional'noe biuro, 2015. ISBN 978-92-8-9052689 (in Russian).]
4. Canadian Contraception Consensus. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline J Obs Gynecol Can 2004; 143: 219–54.
5. Тарасова М.А. Программа CHOICE – «Здоровая контрацепция» – в России. Оржин. 2009; 1: 12–4.
[Tarasova M.A. Programma CHOICE – "Zdorovaia kontratseptsiia" – v Rossii. Orzhin. 2009; 1: 12–4 (in Russian).]
6. Доброхотова Ю.Э., Затикян Н.Г. Сексуальная жизнь и влагалищная контрацептивная рилизинг-система. РМЖ. 2007; 15 (17): 1286–8.
[Dobrokhotova Iu.E., Zatikian N.G. Seksual'naia zhizn' i vlagalishchnaia kontratseptivnaia rilizing-sistema. RMZh. 2007; 15 (17): 1286–8 (in Russian).]
7. Кумыкова З.Х. Консультирование как ключевой фактор при выборе гормональной контрацепции. Акушерство и гинекология. Новости, мнения, обучение. 2016; 2: 52–3.
[Kumykova Z.Kh. Konsul'tirovanie kak kliuchevoi faktor pri vybore gormonal'noi kontratseptsii. Akusherstvo i ginekologiia. Novosti, mneniia, obuchenie. 2016; 2: 52–3 (in Russian).]
8. Lete I, Cuesta MC, Marín JM, Guerra S. Vaginal health in contraceptive vaginal ring users – A review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2013; 18: 234–41.
9. López-Picado A, Lapuente O, Lete I. Efficacy and side-effects profile of the ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel contraceptive vaginal ring: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2017; 22 (2): 131–46.
10. Frost JJ, Lindberg LD. Reasons for using contraception: perspectives of US women seeking care at specialized family planning clinics. Contraception 2013; 87: 465–472.
11. Ahrendt HJ, Nisand I, Bastianelli C et al. Efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of the combined contraceptive ring, NuvaRing, compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 mkg of ethinyl estradiol and 3mg of drospirenone. Contraception 2006; 74: 451–7.
12. Duijkers I, Killick S, Bigrigg A et al. A comparative study on the effects of a contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRingV® and an oral contraceptive on carbohydrate metabolism and adrenal and thyroid function. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2004; 9: 131–40.
13. Sabatini R, Cagiano R. Comparison profiles of cycle control, side effects and sexual satisfaction of three hormonal contraceptives. Contraception 2006; 74: 220–3.
14. Egarter C, Frey Tirri B, Bitzer J et al. Women's perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling. BMC Womens Health 2013; 13: 9. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-9
15. Lete I, Doval JL, Perez-Campos E et al. Self-described impact of noncompliance among users of a combined hormonal contraceptive method. Contraception. 2008; 77: 276–82.
16. Roumen FJ, Dieben TO. Comparison of uterine concentrations of ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel – after use of a contraceptive vaginal ring and an oral contraceptive. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 57–62.
17. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Meehan TE. Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation. Contraception 1995; 51: 283–288.
18. Oddsson K, Leifels-Fischer B, Wiel-Masson D et al. Superior cycle control with f cjntraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contracetive containing 30 mkg ethynylestradiol and 150 mkg levonorgestrel a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 557–62.
19. Jain S, Vaid NB, Narang Y et al. A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Side-Effects of Intravaginal Ring (Nuvaring(®)) With Combined Oral Hormonal Preparation in Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10 (3): QC21-4.
20. Veres S, Miller L, Burington B. A comparison between the vaginal ring and oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 555–63.
21. Weisberg E, Merki-Feld GS, McGeechan K et al. Randomized comparison of bleeding patterns in women using a combined contraceptive vaginal ring or a low-dose combined oral contraceptive on a menstrually signaled regimen. Contraception 2015; 91: 121–6.
22. Agarwal N, Gupta M, Kriplani A et al. Comparison of combined hormonal vaginal ring with ultralow-dose combined oral contraceptive pills in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 36: 71–5.
23. Mohamed AM, El-Sherbiny WS, Mostafa WA. Combined contraceptive ring versus combined oral contraceptive (30-lg ethinylestradiol and 3-mg drospirenone). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 114: 145–8.
24. Bustillos-Alamilla E, Zepeda-Zaragoza J, Hernandez-Ruiz MA, et al. Anticoncepcion con hormonales combinados en ciclos extendidos artificialmente. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2010; 78: 37–45.
25. Dieben TO, Roumen FJ, Apter D. Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 585–93.
26. Прилепская В.Н., Назарова Н.М., Бестаева Н.В. Микробиоценоз влагалища и контрацептивное кольцо. Вопр. гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2012; 11 (1): 75–8.
[Prilepskaia V.N., Nazarova N.M., Bestaeva N.V. Mikrobiotsenoz vlagalishcha i kontratseptivnoe kol'tso. Vopr. ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2012; 11 (1): 75–8 (in Russian).]
27. Минкина Г.Н. Гормональные контрацептивы и риск цервикальной неоплазии. Вопр. гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2013; 12 (1): 56–63.
[Minkina G.N. Gormonal'nye kontratseptivy i risk tservikal'noi neoplazii. Vopr. ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2013; 12 (1): 56–63. (in Russian).]
28. WHO study, 2013.
29. Verhoeven CH, van den Heuvel MW et al. The contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing, and antimycotic co-medication. Contraception 2004; 69 (2): 129–32.
30. Dogterom P, van den Heuvel MW, Thomsen T. Absence of Pharmacokinetic Interactions of the Combined Contraceptive Vaginal Ring NuvaRing with Oral Amoxicillin or Doxycycline in Two Randomised Trials. Clin Pharmacokinetics 2005; 44 (4): 429–38.
31. Haring T, Mulders TM. The combined contraceptive ring NuvaRing and spermicide co-medication. Contraception 2003; 67 (4): 271–2.
32. Прилепская В.Н. НоваРинг – контрацепция, анатомия, сексология. Гинекология. 2004; 6 (6).
[Prilepskaia V.N. NovaRing – kontratseptsiia, anatomiia, seksologiia. Ginekologiia. 2004; 6 (6). (in Russian).]
33. Sabatini R. NuvaRing and sexual comfort. Giornale Italiano di Ostetrica e Ginecologia 2004; 26 (7): 321–3.
________________________________________________
1. Rukovodstvo po kontratseptsii. Pod red. V.N.Prilepskoi. Izd. 5-e, dop. Moscow: MEDpress-inform, 2018 (in Russian).
2. Sakevich V.I. Ot aborta k kontratseptsii. Demoskop Weekle. 2016; 687–88 (in Russian).
3. Vsemirnaia organizatsiia zdravookhraneniia. Meditsinskie kriterii priemlemosti metodov kontratseptsii. VOZ, Evropeiskoe regional'noe biuro, 2015. ISBN 978-92-8-9052689 (in Russian).
4. Canadian Contraception Consensus. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline J Obs Gynecol Can 2004; 143: 219–54.
5. Tarasova M.A. Programma CHOICE – "Zdorovaia kontratseptsiia" – v Rossii. Orzhin. 2009; 1: 12–4 (in Russian).
6. Dobrokhotova Iu.E., Zatikian N.G. Seksual'naia zhizn' i vlagalishchnaia kontratseptivnaia rilizing-sistema. RMZh. 2007; 15 (17): 1286–8 (in Russian).
7. Kumykova Z.Kh. Konsul'tirovanie kak kliuchevoi faktor pri vybore gormonal'noi kontratseptsii. Akusherstvo i ginekologiia. Novosti, mneniia, obuchenie. 2016; 2: 52–3 (in Russian).
8. Lete I, Cuesta MC, Marín JM, Guerra S. Vaginal health in contraceptive vaginal ring users – A review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2013; 18: 234–41.
9. López-Picado A, Lapuente O, Lete I. Efficacy and side-effects profile of the ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel contraceptive vaginal ring: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2017; 22 (2): 131–46.
10. Frost JJ, Lindberg LD. Reasons for using contraception: perspectives of US women seeking care at specialized family planning clinics. Contraception 2013; 87: 465–472.
11. Ahrendt HJ, Nisand I, Bastianelli C et al. Efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of the combined contraceptive ring, NuvaRing, compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 mkg of ethinyl estradiol and 3mg of drospirenone. Contraception 2006; 74: 451–7.
12. Duijkers I, Killick S, Bigrigg A et al. A comparative study on the effects of a contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRingV® and an oral contraceptive on carbohydrate metabolism and adrenal and thyroid function. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2004; 9: 131–40.
13. Sabatini R, Cagiano R. Comparison profiles of cycle control, side effects and sexual satisfaction of three hormonal contraceptives. Contraception 2006; 74: 220–3.
14. Egarter C, Frey Tirri B, Bitzer J et al. Women's perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling. BMC Womens Health 2013; 13: 9. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-9
15. Lete I, Doval JL, Perez-Campos E et al. Self-described impact of noncompliance among users of a combined hormonal contraceptive method. Contraception. 2008; 77: 276–82.
16. Roumen FJ, Dieben TO. Comparison of uterine concentrations of ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel – after use of a contraceptive vaginal ring and an oral contraceptive. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 57–62.
17. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Meehan TE. Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation. Contraception 1995; 51: 283–288.
18. Oddsson K, Leifels-Fischer B, Wiel-Masson D et al. Superior cycle control with f cjntraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contracetive containing 30 mkg ethynylestradiol and 150 mkg levonorgestrel a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 557–62.
19. Jain S, Vaid NB, Narang Y et al. A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Side-Effects of Intravaginal Ring (Nuvaring(®)) With Combined Oral Hormonal Preparation in Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10 (3): QC21-4.
20. Veres S, Miller L, Burington B. A comparison between the vaginal ring and oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 555–63.
21. Weisberg E, Merki-Feld GS, McGeechan K et al. Randomized comparison of bleeding patterns in women using a combined contraceptive vaginal ring or a low-dose combined oral contraceptive on a menstrually signaled regimen. Contraception 2015; 91: 121–6.
22. Agarwal N, Gupta M, Kriplani A et al. Comparison of combined hormonal vaginal ring with ultralow-dose combined oral contraceptive pills in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 36: 71–5.
23. Mohamed AM, El-Sherbiny WS, Mostafa WA. Combined contraceptive ring versus combined oral contraceptive (30-lg ethinylestradiol and 3-mg drospirenone). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 114: 145–8.
24. Bustillos-Alamilla E, Zepeda-Zaragoza J, Hernandez-Ruiz MA, et al. Anticoncepcion con hormonales combinados en ciclos extendidos artificialmente. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2010; 78: 37–45.
25. Dieben TO, Roumen FJ, Apter D. Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 585–93.
26. Prilepskaia V.N., Nazarova N.M., Bestaeva N.V. Mikrobiotsenoz vlagalishcha i kontratseptivnoe kol'tso. Vopr. ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2012; 11 (1): 75–8 (in Russian).
27. Minkina G.N. Gormonal'nye kontratseptivy i risk tservikal'noi neoplazii. Vopr. ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2013; 12 (1): 56–63. (in Russian).
28. WHO study, 2013.
29. Verhoeven CH, van den Heuvel MW et al. The contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing, and antimycotic co-medication. Contraception 2004; 69 (2): 129–32.
30. Dogterom P, van den Heuvel MW, Thomsen T. Absence of Pharmacokinetic Interactions of the Combined Contraceptive Vaginal Ring NuvaRing with Oral Amoxicillin or Doxycycline in Two Randomised Trials. Clin Pharmacokinetics 2005; 44 (4): 429–38.
31. Haring T, Mulders TM. The combined contraceptive ring NuvaRing and spermicide co-medication. Contraception 2003; 67 (4): 271–2.
32. Prilepskaia V.N. NovaRing – kontratseptsiia, anatomiia, seksologiia. Ginekologiia. 2004; 6 (6). (in Russian).
33. Sabatini R. NuvaRing and sexual comfort. Giornale Italiano di Ostetrica e Ginecologia 2004; 26 (7): 321–3.
Авторы
Е.А. Межевитинова, В.Н. Прилепская*
ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. Кулакова» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия
*VPrilepskaya@mail.ru
________________________________________________
Elena A. Mezhevitinova, Vera N. Prilepskaya**
V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Moscow, Russia
*VPrilepskaya@mail.ru