В работе представлены результаты российского исследования, посвященного клинико-экономической оценке применения препарата зофеноприл у пациентов с артериальной гипертензией и инфарктом миокарда. Выявлено, что применение зофеноприла клинически и экономически обосновано значительно меньшими значениями коэффициентов затраты–эффективность, чем в группах сравнения.
The paper gives the results of a Russian study dealing with the clinico-economic evaluation of zofenopril used in patients with arterial hypertension and myocardial infarction. The use of the drug was found to be clinically and economically substantiated by much lower cost-effectiveness ratios than in the comparison groups.
1. Белоусов Ю.Б., Белоусов Д.Ю., Леонова М.В. и др. Первые результаты фармакоэпидемиологического исследования артериальной гипертонии ПИФАГОР III. Качественная клиническая практика. 2010; 1: 54–60.
2. Преображенский Д.В., Сидоренко Б.А., Бугримова М.А. и др. Зофеноприл (Зокардис) – кардиоселективный ингибитор ангиотензинпревращающего фермента: особенности клинической фармакологии и перспективы применения при лечении сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. РМЖ.
3. Сидоренко Б.А., Преображенский Д.В., Батыралиев Т.А. Ингибиторы АПФ и АТ1-блокаторы в клинической практике. М.: Пресид-Альянс, 2002.
4. Сидоренко Б.А., Преображенский Д.В., Батыралиев Т.А. Ингибиторы АПФ и АТ1-ангиотензиновые блокаторы в клинической практике превращающего фермента. М.: Пресид-Альянс, 2004.
5. Cushman DW, Wang FL, Fung WC et al. Comparisons in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo of the the actions of seven structurally diverse inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). – Brit J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 28 (Suppl. 2): 115S–131S.
6. Cushman DW, Wang FL, Fung WC et al. Differentiation of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors by selective inhibition of ACE in physiologically important target organs. – Amer J Hypertension 1989; 2 (4): 294–306.
7. Borghi C, Ambrosioni E. Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long–term Evaluation–2 Working Party. Double–blind comparison between zofenopril and lisinopril in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long–term Evaluation–2 (SMILE–2) study. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 80–7.
8. Borghi C, Ambrosioni E. Effects of zofenopril on myocardial ischemia in post–myocardial infarction patients with preserved left ventricular function: The Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long–term Evaluation (SMILE)–ISCHEMIA study. Am Heart J 2007 153, Issue 3, Pages 445.e7–445.e14.
9. Farsang C. Blood pressure control and response rates with zofenopril compared with amlodipine in hypertensive patients. Blood Press Suppl 2007; 2: 19–24.
10. Lacourciere Y, Provencher P. Comparative effects of zofenopril and hydrochlorothiazide on office and ambulatory blood pressures in mild to moderate essential hypertension Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 27 (3): 371–6.
11. Mallion JM. An evaluation of the initial and long-term antihypertensive efficacy of zofenopril compared with enalapril in mild to moderate hypertension. Blood Press Suppl 2007; 2: 13–8.
12. Nilsson P. Antihypertensive efficacy of zofenopril compared with atenolol in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Blood Press Suppl 2007; 2: 25–30.
13. Sun Y, Mendelsohn FA. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in heart, kidney, and serum studied ex vivo after administration of zofenopril, captopril, and lisinopril. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991; 18 (4): 478–86.
14. Ambrosioni E, Borghi C, Magnani B. Early treatment of acute myocardial infarction with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: safety considerations. SMILE pilot study working party. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68 (14): 101D–110D.
15. Ambrosioni E, Borghi C, Magnani B. The effect of the angiotensin– converting–enzyme inhibitor zofenopril on mortality and morbidity after anterior myocardial infarction. The Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long–term Evaluation (SMILE) Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 80–5.
16. Borghi C, Cicero AF, Ambrosioni E. Effects of early treatment with zofenopril in patients with myocardial infarction and metabolic syndrome: the SMILE Study. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008; 4 (3): 665–71.
17. Narkiewicz K. Comparison of home and office blood pressure in hypertensive patients treated with zofenopril or losartan Blood Pressure 2007; 16 (Suppl. 2): 7–12.
18. Ряженов В.В., Горохова С.Г., Бунятян Н.Д. Анализ влияния на бюджет: особенности применения метода. Фармация: Науч.-практ. журн. 2011; 1: 41–4.
19. Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L et al. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices–budget impact analysis Value Health 2007; 10 (5): 336–47.
Авторы
В.В.Ряженов
ГБОУ ВПО Первый МГМУ им. И.М.Сеченова Минздрава РФ ryazhenov@mail.ru
________________________________________________
V.V.Ryazhenov
I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation ryazhenov@mail.ru