Внутрисосудистые методы профилактики ишемического инсульта: ангиопластика со стентированием сонных артерий при атеросклеротическом стенозе
Внутрисосудистые методы профилактики ишемического инсульта: ангиопластика со стентированием сонных артерий при атеросклеротическом стенозе
Д.В.Свистов, Д.В.Кандыба, А.В.Савелло, С.А.Ландик, И.А.Вознюк. Внутрисосудистые методы профилактики ишемического инсульта: агиопластика со стентированием сонных артерий при атеросклеротическом стенозе. Consilium Medicum. Неврология (Прил.). 2008; 1: 41-46.
Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения. Авторизуйтесь или зарегистрируйтесь.
Список литературы
1. Инсульт. Принципы диагностики, лечения и профилактики. Под. ред. Н.В.Верещагина, М.А.Пирадова, З.А.Суслиной. М.: Интермедика, 2002.
2. Spencer MP. Hemodynamics of arterial stenosis. Ultrasonic diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. M.Spencer (ed.). 1987; p. 179–92.
3. Alexandrov AV, Norris JW. Quantitation and grading of carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovascular ultrasound: theory, practice, and future developments. M.G.Hennerici, S.P.Meairs (eds.). Cambridge University press, 2001; p. 223–36.
4. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ collaborative group (ECST). MRS European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70% to 99%) or with mild (0% to 29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337 (8752): 1235–43.
5. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Collaboratots. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. New Engl J Med 1991; 325 (7): 445–53.
6. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al.. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in highrisk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493–501.
7. Sundt TM, Sandok BA, Whisnant JP. Carotid endarterectomy: complications and preoperative assessment of risk. Mayo Clin Proc 1975; 50: 301–6.
8. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement. developed by a collaborative panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 1079–93.
9. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2003; 60: 259–66.
10. Das S, Bendok BR, Getch CC et al. Update on current registries and trials of carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18 (1): E2.
11. Ogasawara K, Sakai N, Kuroiwa T et al. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: retrospective review of 4494 patients. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (6): 1130–6.
12. GrЪschel K, Riecker A, Schulz JB et al. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 2005; 36 (2): 367–73.
13. Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P et al. Long-Term Results of Carotid Stenting versus Endarterectomy in High-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1572–9.
2. Spencer MP. Hemodynamics of arterial stenosis. Ultrasonic diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. M.Spencer (ed.). 1987; p. 179–92.
3. Alexandrov AV, Norris JW. Quantitation and grading of carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovascular ultrasound: theory, practice, and future developments. M.G.Hennerici, S.P.Meairs (eds.). Cambridge University press, 2001; p. 223–36.
4. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ collaborative group (ECST). MRS European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70% to 99%) or with mild (0% to 29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337 (8752): 1235–43.
5. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Collaboratots. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. New Engl J Med 1991; 325 (7): 445–53.
6. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al.. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in highrisk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493–501.
7. Sundt TM, Sandok BA, Whisnant JP. Carotid endarterectomy: complications and preoperative assessment of risk. Mayo Clin Proc 1975; 50: 301–6.
8. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement. developed by a collaborative panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 1079–93.
9. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2003; 60: 259–66.
10. Das S, Bendok BR, Getch CC et al. Update on current registries and trials of carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18 (1): E2.
11. Ogasawara K, Sakai N, Kuroiwa T et al. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: retrospective review of 4494 patients. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (6): 1130–6.
12. GrЪschel K, Riecker A, Schulz JB et al. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 2005; 36 (2): 367–73.
13. Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P et al. Long-Term Results of Carotid Stenting versus Endarterectomy in High-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1572–9.
Авторы
Д.В.Свистов1, Д.В.Кандыба1, А.В.Савелло1, С.А.Ландик1, И.А.Вознюк2
1. Кафедра и клиника нейрохирургии,
2. Кафедра нервных болезней Военно-медицинской академии им. С.М.Кирова,
Санкт-Петербург
1. Кафедра и клиника нейрохирургии,
2. Кафедра нервных болезней Военно-медицинской академии им. С.М.Кирова,
Санкт-Петербург
Цель портала OmniDoctor – предоставление профессиональной информации врачам, провизорам и фармацевтам.