Роботизированные технологии в урологии

1. Arnold M, Karim-Kos HE, Coebergh JW et al. Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: Analysis of the European Cancer Observatory. Eur J Cancer 2013. pii: S0959-8049(13)00842-3. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.002. [Epub ahead of print].
2. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Mehta SS et al. Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE). J Urol 2003; 170: 21–5; discussion 26–7.
3. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128: 492–7.
4. Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy: a new extravesical technique report on 20 cases. 1945. J Urol 2002; 167: 976–9; discussion 980.
5. Mottet N (chair), Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. 2014; p. 57–67.
6. Menon M, Tewari  A, Peabody JO. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 701–17.
7. Intuitive Surgical®, Inc., intuitivesurgical.com. 2010. Annual Report.
8. Gainsburg DM, Wax D, Reich DL et al. Intraoperative management of robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy. J Soc Laparoend 2010; 14: 1–5.
9. Kordan Y, Barocas DA, Altamar HO et al. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol Int 2010; 106: 1036–40.
10. Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. 
Br J Urol Int 2009; 104: 991–5.
11. Truesdale MD, Lee DJ, Cheetham PJ et al. Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era. J Endourol 2010; 24: 1055–60.
12. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 453–8.
13. Lo KL, Ng CF, Lam CN et al. Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for localised carcinoma of prostate. Hong Kong Med J 2010; 16: 31–5.
14. Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. 
J Urol 2010; 75: 1092–7.
15. Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM et al. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J Urol 2010; 183: 1366–72.
16. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. Br J Urol Int 2009; 104: 534–9.
17. Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P et al. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2011; 59 (1): 1–6.
18. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. J Am Med Assoc 2009; 302: 1557–64.
19. Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T et al. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? Br J Urol Int 2008; 102: 1413–8.
20. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 1037–63.
21. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ et al. Radical prostatec- tomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. Br J Urol Int 2009; 103: 448–53.
22. Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol 2010; 183: 990–6.
23. Choi WW, Gu X, Lipsitz SR et al. The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume. Urol Oncol 2012; 30 (5): 569–76.
24. Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010; 24: 2003–15.
25. Malcolm JB, Fabrizio MD, Barone BB et al. Quality of life after open or robotic prostatectomy, cryoablation or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2010; 183: 1822–8.
26. Thorsteinsdottir T et al. LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011; 
45 (2): 102–12. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
27. Wilson T, Torrey R. Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr Opin Urol 2011; 21 (3): 200–5.
28. Kim SC et al. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Eur Urol 2011; 60 (3): 413–9.
29. Meyer EK, Winkler MH, Aggarwal R et al. Robotic prostatectomy: the first UK experience. Int J Med Robot 2006; 2 (4): 321–8.

А.В.Говоров, А.О.Васильев, К.Б.Колонтарев, Д.Ю.Пушкарь

Кафедра урологии ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им. А.И.Евдокимова Минздрава России