Современное состояние проблемы недержания мочи после радикальной простатэктомии

1. Magheli A, Jonas Busch J, Leva N et al. Comparison of surgical technique (Open vs. Laparoscopic) on pathological and long term functional outcomes following radical prostatectomy. BMC Urology 2014; 14: 18–24.
2. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 405–17.
3. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L et al. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 213–40.
4. Campodonico F, Manuputty EE, Campora S et al. Age is predictive of immediate postoperative urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int 2014; 92 (3): 276–81.
5. Becker A, Tennstedt P, Hansen J et al. Functional and oncological outcomes of patients aged <50 years treated with radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer in a European population. BJU Int 2014; 114 (1): 38–45.
6. Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Gallina A et al. Preoperative erectile function represents a significant predictor of postoperative urinary continence recovery in patients treated with bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2012; 187 (2): 569–74.
7. Xu T, Wang X, Xia L et al. Robot-assisted prostatectomy in obese patients: how influential is obesity on operative outcomes? J Endourol 2015; 29 (2): 198–208.
8. Bayoud Y, de la Taille A, Ouzzane A et al. International Prostate Symptom Score is a predictive factor of lower urinary tract symptoms after radicalprostatectomy. Int J Urol 2015; 22 (3): 283–7.
9. Wallerstedt A, Carlsson S, Steineck G et al. Patient and tumour-related factors for prediction of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol 2013; 47 (4): 272–81.
10. Ko YH, Coelho RF, Chauhan S et al. Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis from a large prospective data by a single surgeon. J Urol 2012; 187: 190–4.
11. Song C, Lee J, Hong JH et al. Urodynamic interpretation of changing bladder function and voiding pattern after radical prostatectomy: a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2010; 106: 681–6.
12. Claudon P, Spie R, Bats M et al. Male stress urinary incontinence: medium-term results of treatment by sub-urethral bone anchored sling InVanceTM. Prog Urol 2011; 21 (9): 625–30.
13. Spie R, Claudon P, Raynal G et al. Radiotherapy influence, about results of the InVance(R) male sling in men with stress urinary incontinence. Prog Urol 2011; 21 (8): 549–53.
14. Romano SV, Huebner W, Rocha FT et al. A transobturator adjustable system for male incontinence: 30-month follow-up of a multicenter study. Braz J Urol 2014; 40: 781–9.
15. Cerruto MA, D'Elia С, Artibani W. Continence and complications rates after male slings as primary surgery for post-prostatectomy incontinence: A systematic review. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2013; 85 (2): 92–5.
16. Rehder P, Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 52 (3): 860–7.
17. Serra AC, Folkersma LR, Dom JL et al. Narb on AdVance/AdVance XP Transobturator Male Slings: Preoperative Degree of Incontinence as Predictor of Surgical Outcome. Urology 2013; 81: 1034–9.
18. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Roosen A et al. Impact of the 'repositioning test' on postoperative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male slingimplantation. Urol Int 2013; 90 (3): 334–8.
19. Sturm RM, Guralnick ML, Stone AR et al. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between “Ideal” and “Nonideal” Transobturator Male Sling Patients for Treatment of Postprostatectomy Incontinence. Urology 2014; 83: 1186–9.
20. Pistolesi D, Zampa V, Gozzi С еt al. Could the Sling Position Influence the Clinical Outcome in Male Patients Treated for Urinary Incontinence? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study With a 3 Tesla System. Urology 2014; 83: 471–6.
21. Kowalik CG, DeLong JM, Mourtzinos AP. The advance transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: subjective and objective outcomes with 3 years follow up. Neurourol Urodyn 2015; 34 (3): 251–4.
22. Zuckerman JM, Edwards B, Henderson K et al. Extended Outcomes in the Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence With a Transobturator Sling. Urology 2014; 83: 939–45.
23. Hall M, Polland A, Weissbart S et al. Prognostic value of postoperative urinary retention after male sling insertion. Can J Urol 2014; 21 (4): 7344–9.
24. Bauer RM, Kretschmer A, Stief CG et al. AdVance and AdVance XP slings for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. World J Urol 2015; 33 (1): 145–50.
25. Martinez EJ, Zuckerman JM, Henderson K et al. Evaluation of Salvage Male Transobturator Sling Placement Following Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence After Failed Transobturator Sling. Urology 2015; 85: 478–82.
26. Holm HV, Fossa SD, Hedlund H et al. Severe postprostatectomy incontinence: Is there an association between preoperative urodynamic findings and outcome of incontinence surgery? Scand J Urol 2015; 49 (3): 250–9.
27. Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR et al. The Artificial Urinary Sphincter After a Quarter of a Century: A Critical Systematic Review of Its Use in Male Non-neurogenic Incontinence. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 681–9.
28. Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Ziegelmann MJ et al. Long-term Outcomes Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: An Analysis of 1082 Cases at Mayo Clinic. Urology 2015; 86: 602–7.
29. Lеon P, Chartier-Kastler E, Rouprкt M еt al. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2015; 115: 951–7.
30. Gulpinar O, Suer E, Gokce MI et al. Functional Outcomes and Long-term Durability of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Application: Review of 56 Patients With Long-term Follow-up Korean. J Urol 2013; 54: 373–6.
31. Singla N, Siegel JA, Simhan J et al. Does Pressure Regulating Balloon Location Make a Difference in Functional Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter? J Urol 2015; 194 (1): 202–6.
32. Chung PH, Morey AF, Tausch TJ et al. High Submuscular Placement of Urologic Prosthetic Balloons and Reservoirs: 2-Year Experience and Patient-reported Outcomes. Urology 2014; 84: 1540–5.
33. Simhan J, Morey AF, Zhao LC et al. Decreasing need for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery by precise cuff sizing in men with spongiosal atrophy. J Urol 2014; 192 (3): 798–803.
34. Lai HH, Boone TB. The surgical learning curve of artificial urinary sphincter implantation: implications for prosthetic training and referral. J Urol 2013; 189 (4): 1437–43.
35. Sandhu JS. Artificial Urinary Sphincter: The Workhorse for Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 690–2.
36. McGeady JB, McAninch JW, Truesdale MD et al. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Compromised Urethras and Survival: A Comparison of Virgin, Radiated and Reoperative Cases. J Urol 2014; 192 (6): 1756–61.
37. Sathianathen NJ, McGuigan SM, Moon DA. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient. BJU Int 2014; 113: 636–41.
38. Selph JP, Madden-Fuentes R, Peterson AC et al. LentzLong-term Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outcomes Following a Prior Rectourethral Fistula Repair. Urology 2015; 86: 608–12.
39. De Cogain MR, Elliott DS. The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate. J Urol 2013; 190 (1): 113–7.
40. Linder BJ, Piotrowski JT, Ziegelmann MJ et al. Perioperative Complications following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement. J Urol 2015; 194 (3): 716–20.
41. Brant WO, Erickson BA, Elliott SP et al. Risk Factors for Erosion of Artificial Urinary Sphincters: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Urology 2014; 84 (4): 934–8.

________________________________________________

1. Magheli A, Jonas Busch J, Leva N et al. Comparison of surgical technique (Open vs. Laparoscopic) on pathological and long term functional outcomes following radical prostatectomy. BMC Urology 2014; 14: 18–24.
2. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 405–17.
3. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L et al. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 213–40.
4. Campodonico F, Manuputty EE, Campora S et al. Age is predictive of immediate postoperative urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int 2014; 92 (3): 276–81.
5. Becker A, Tennstedt P, Hansen J et al. Functional and oncological outcomes of patients aged <50 years treated with radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer in a European population. BJU Int 2014; 114 (1): 38–45.
6. Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Gallina A et al. Preoperative erectile function represents a significant predictor of postoperative urinary continence recovery in patients treated with bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2012; 187 (2): 569–74.
7. Xu T, Wang X, Xia L et al. Robot-assisted prostatectomy in obese patients: how influential is obesity on operative outcomes? J Endourol 2015; 29 (2): 198–208.
8. Bayoud Y, de la Taille A, Ouzzane A et al. International Prostate Symptom Score is a predictive factor of lower urinary tract symptoms after radicalprostatectomy. Int J Urol 2015; 22 (3): 283–7.
9. Wallerstedt A, Carlsson S, Steineck G et al. Patient and tumour-related factors for prediction of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol 2013; 47 (4): 272–81.
10. Ko YH, Coelho RF, Chauhan S et al. Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis from a large prospective data by a single surgeon. J Urol 2012; 187: 190–4.
11. Song C, Lee J, Hong JH et al. Urodynamic interpretation of changing bladder function and voiding pattern after radical prostatectomy: a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2010; 106: 681–6.
12. Claudon P, Spie R, Bats M et al. Male stress urinary incontinence: medium-term results of treatment by sub-urethral bone anchored sling InVanceTM. Prog Urol 2011; 21 (9): 625–30.
13. Spie R, Claudon P, Raynal G et al. Radiotherapy influence, about results of the InVance(R) male sling in men with stress urinary incontinence. Prog Urol 2011; 21 (8): 549–53.
14. Romano SV, Huebner W, Rocha FT et al. A transobturator adjustable system for male incontinence: 30-month follow-up of a multicenter study. Braz J Urol 2014; 40: 781–9.
15. Cerruto MA, D'Elia С, Artibani W. Continence and complications rates after male slings as primary surgery for post-prostatectomy incontinence: A systematic review. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2013; 85 (2): 92–5.
16. Rehder P, Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 52 (3): 860–7.
17. Serra AC, Folkersma LR, Dom JL et al. Narb on AdVance/AdVance XP Transobturator Male Slings: Preoperative Degree of Incontinence as Predictor of Surgical Outcome. Urology 2013; 81: 1034–9.
18. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Roosen A et al. Impact of the 'repositioning test' on postoperative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male slingimplantation. Urol Int 2013; 90 (3): 334–8.
19. Sturm RM, Guralnick ML, Stone AR et al. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between “Ideal” and “Nonideal” Transobturator Male Sling Patients for Treatment of Postprostatectomy Incontinence. Urology 2014; 83: 1186–9.
20. Pistolesi D, Zampa V, Gozzi С еt al. Could the Sling Position Influence the Clinical Outcome in Male Patients Treated for Urinary Incontinence? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study With a 3 Tesla System. Urology 2014; 83: 471–6.
21. Kowalik CG, DeLong JM, Mourtzinos AP. The advance transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: subjective and objective outcomes with 3 years follow up. Neurourol Urodyn 2015; 34 (3): 251–4.
22. Zuckerman JM, Edwards B, Henderson K et al. Extended Outcomes in the Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence With a Transobturator Sling. Urology 2014; 83: 939–45.
23. Hall M, Polland A, Weissbart S et al. Prognostic value of postoperative urinary retention after male sling insertion. Can J Urol 2014; 21 (4): 7344–9.
24. Bauer RM, Kretschmer A, Stief CG et al. AdVance and AdVance XP slings for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. World J Urol 2015; 33 (1): 145–50.
25. Martinez EJ, Zuckerman JM, Henderson K et al. Evaluation of Salvage Male Transobturator Sling Placement Following Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence After Failed Transobturator Sling. Urology 2015; 85: 478–82.
26. Holm HV, Fossa SD, Hedlund H et al. Severe postprostatectomy incontinence: Is there an association between preoperative urodynamic findings and outcome of incontinence surgery? Scand J Urol 2015; 49 (3): 250–9.
27. Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR et al. The Artificial Urinary Sphincter After a Quarter of a Century: A Critical Systematic Review of Its Use in Male Non-neurogenic Incontinence. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 681–9.
28. Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Ziegelmann MJ et al. Long-term Outcomes Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: An Analysis of 1082 Cases at Mayo Clinic. Urology 2015; 86: 602–7.
29. Lеon P, Chartier-Kastler E, Rouprкt M еt al. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2015; 115: 951–7.
30. Gulpinar O, Suer E, Gokce MI et al. Functional Outcomes and Long-term Durability of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Application: Review of 56 Patients With Long-term Follow-up Korean. J Urol 2013; 54: 373–6.
31. Singla N, Siegel JA, Simhan J et al. Does Pressure Regulating Balloon Location Make a Difference in Functional Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter? J Urol 2015; 194 (1): 202–6.
32. Chung PH, Morey AF, Tausch TJ et al. High Submuscular Placement of Urologic Prosthetic Balloons and Reservoirs: 2-Year Experience and Patient-reported Outcomes. Urology 2014; 84: 1540–5.
33. Simhan J, Morey AF, Zhao LC et al. Decreasing need for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery by precise cuff sizing in men with spongiosal atrophy. J Urol 2014; 192 (3): 798–803.
34. Lai HH, Boone TB. The surgical learning curve of artificial urinary sphincter implantation: implications for prosthetic training and referral. J Urol 2013; 189 (4): 1437–43.
35. Sandhu JS. Artificial Urinary Sphincter: The Workhorse for Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 690–2.
36. McGeady JB, McAninch JW, Truesdale MD et al. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Compromised Urethras and Survival: A Comparison of Virgin, Radiated and Reoperative Cases. J Urol 2014; 192 (6): 1756–61.
37. Sathianathen NJ, McGuigan SM, Moon DA. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient. BJU Int 2014; 113: 636–41.
38. Selph JP, Madden-Fuentes R, Peterson AC et al. LentzLong-term Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outcomes Following a Prior Rectourethral Fistula Repair. Urology 2015; 86: 608–12.
39. De Cogain MR, Elliott DS. The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate. J Urol 2013; 190 (1): 113–7.
40. Linder BJ, Piotrowski JT, Ziegelmann MJ et al. Perioperative Complications following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement. J Urol 2015; 194 (3): 716–20.
41. Brant WO, Erickson BA, Elliott SP et al. Risk Factors for Erosion of Artificial Urinary Sphincters: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Urology 2014; 84 (4): 934–8.

Е.Н.Голубцова*1,2, А.А.Томилов2, Е.И.Велиев1,2

1 ФГБОУ ДПО «Российская медицинская академия непрерывного профессионального образования» Минздрава России. 125993, Россия, Москва, ул. Баррикадная, д. 2/1;
2 ГБУЗ «ГКБ им. С.П.Боткина» Департамента здравоохранения г. Москвы. 125284, Россия, Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, д. 5
*engolubtsova@yandex.ru

________________________________________________

E.N.Golubtsova*1,2, A.A.Tomilov2, E.I.Veliev1,2

1 Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 125993, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Barrikadnaia, d. 2/1;
2 S.P.Botkin City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow. 125284, Russian Federation, Moscow, 2-i Botkinskii proezd, d. 5
*engolubtsova@yandex.ru