Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения.
Чтобы посмотреть материал полностью
Авторизуйтесь
или зарегистрируйтесь.
Новый дерматоскопический алгоритм «Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm»: вопросы применения в клинической практике
Новый дерматоскопический алгоритм «Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm»: вопросы применения в клинической практике
Жучков М.В., Жильцова Е.Е., Шилин Р.Р., Родионова С.А. Новый дерматоскопический алгоритм «Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm»: вопросы применения в клинической практике. Дерматология (Прил. к журн. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 3: 26–30.
issues of clinical applications. Dermatology (Suppl. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 3: 26–30.
________________________________________________
issues of clinical applications. Dermatology (Suppl. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 3: 26–30.
Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения.
Чтобы посмотреть материал полностью
Авторизуйтесь
или зарегистрируйтесь.
Аннотация
В статье приводится подробное описание нового дерматоскопического алгоритма «Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm», разработанного специально для применения врачами общей практики в целях раннего выявления потенциально злокачественных новообразований кожи и направления таких пациентов для референтной консультации врача-дерматолога или проведения эксцизионной биопсии.
________________________________________________
Полный текст
Список литературы
1. Apalla Z et al. Epidemiological trends in skin cancer. Dermatol Pract Concept 2017; 7 (2): 1–6.
2. Kittler H et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3: 159–65.
3. Vestergaard ME et al. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 669–76.
4. Engasser HC, Warshaw EM. Dermatoscopy use by US dermatologists: a cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 412–19.
5. Kimball AB, Resneck JS. The US dermatology workforce: A specialty remains in shortage. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 741–5.
6. Moore MM et al. Skin cancer examination teaching in US medical education. Arch Derm 2006; 142: 439–44.
7. Vestergaard ME et al. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: A meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 669–76.
8. Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1877–82.
9. Soyer HP et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy. A new screening method for early detection of melanoma. Dermatology 2004; 208: 27–31.
10. Koelink CJ et al. Examination of skin lesions for cancer: Which clinical decision aids and tools are available in general practice? Eur J Dermatol 2014; 24: 297–304.
11. Rogers T et al. A Clinical Aid for Detecting Skin Cancer: The Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA). J Am Board Fam Med 2016; 29 (6): 694–701.
12. Rogers T et al. Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) for skin cancer screening. Dermatol Pract Concept 2017; 30; 7 (2): 39–46.
13. Жучков М.В., Булиньска А.К., Киттлер Г. Применение алгоритма «Хаос и признаки» в оценке дерматоскопических изображений пигментных новообразований кожи. Дерматология (Прил. к журн. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 2: 5–13. / Zhuchkov M.V., Bulinska A.K., Kittler H. Application of the algorithm “Chaos and Clues” in assessing dermatoscopy images of pigmented skin lesions. Dermatology (Suppl. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 2: 5–13.
14. Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: Results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 679–93.
2. Kittler H et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3: 159–65.
3. Vestergaard ME et al. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 669–76.
4. Engasser HC, Warshaw EM. Dermatoscopy use by US dermatologists: a cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 412–19.
5. Kimball AB, Resneck JS. The US dermatology workforce: A specialty remains in shortage. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 741–5.
6. Moore MM et al. Skin cancer examination teaching in US medical education. Arch Derm 2006; 142: 439–44.
7. Vestergaard ME et al. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: A meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 669–76.
8. Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1877–82.
9. Soyer HP et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy. A new screening method for early detection of melanoma. Dermatology 2004; 208: 27–31.
10. Koelink CJ et al. Examination of skin lesions for cancer: Which clinical decision aids and tools are available in general practice? Eur J Dermatol 2014; 24: 297–304.
11. Rogers T et al. A Clinical Aid for Detecting Skin Cancer: The Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA). J Am Board Fam Med 2016; 29 (6): 694–701.
12. Rogers T et al. Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) for skin cancer screening. Dermatol Pract Concept 2017; 30; 7 (2): 39–46.
13. Zhuchkov M.V., Bulinska A.K., Kittler H. Application of the algorithm “Chaos and Clues” in assessing dermatoscopy images of pigmented skin lesions. Dermatology (Suppl. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 2: 5–13.
14. Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: Results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 679–93.
2. Kittler H et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3: 159–65.
3. Vestergaard ME et al. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 669–76.
4. Engasser HC, Warshaw EM. Dermatoscopy use by US dermatologists: a cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 412–19.
5. Kimball AB, Resneck JS. The US dermatology workforce: A specialty remains in shortage. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 741–5.
6. Moore MM et al. Skin cancer examination teaching in US medical education. Arch Derm 2006; 142: 439–44.
7. Vestergaard ME et al. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: A meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 669–76.
8. Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1877–82.
9. Soyer HP et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy. A new screening method for early detection of melanoma. Dermatology 2004; 208: 27–31.
10. Koelink CJ et al. Examination of skin lesions for cancer: Which clinical decision aids and tools are available in general practice? Eur J Dermatol 2014; 24: 297–304.
11. Rogers T et al. A Clinical Aid for Detecting Skin Cancer: The Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA). J Am Board Fam Med 2016; 29 (6): 694–701.
12. Rogers T et al. Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) for skin cancer screening. Dermatol Pract Concept 2017; 30; 7 (2): 39–46.
13. Жучков М.В., Булиньска А.К., Киттлер Г. Применение алгоритма «Хаос и признаки» в оценке дерматоскопических изображений пигментных новообразований кожи. Дерматология (Прил. к журн. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 2: 5–13. / Zhuchkov M.V., Bulinska A.K., Kittler H. Application of the algorithm “Chaos and Clues” in assessing dermatoscopy images of pigmented skin lesions. Dermatology (Suppl. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 2: 5–13.
14. Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: Results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 679–93.
________________________________________________
2. Kittler H et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3: 159–65.
3. Vestergaard ME et al. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 669–76.
4. Engasser HC, Warshaw EM. Dermatoscopy use by US dermatologists: a cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 412–19.
5. Kimball AB, Resneck JS. The US dermatology workforce: A specialty remains in shortage. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 741–5.
6. Moore MM et al. Skin cancer examination teaching in US medical education. Arch Derm 2006; 142: 439–44.
7. Vestergaard ME et al. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: A meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 669–76.
8. Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1877–82.
9. Soyer HP et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy. A new screening method for early detection of melanoma. Dermatology 2004; 208: 27–31.
10. Koelink CJ et al. Examination of skin lesions for cancer: Which clinical decision aids and tools are available in general practice? Eur J Dermatol 2014; 24: 297–304.
11. Rogers T et al. A Clinical Aid for Detecting Skin Cancer: The Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA). J Am Board Fam Med 2016; 29 (6): 694–701.
12. Rogers T et al. Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) for skin cancer screening. Dermatol Pract Concept 2017; 30; 7 (2): 39–46.
13. Zhuchkov M.V., Bulinska A.K., Kittler H. Application of the algorithm “Chaos and Clues” in assessing dermatoscopy images of pigmented skin lesions. Dermatology (Suppl. Consilium Medicum). 2017; 2: 5–13.
14. Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: Results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 679–93.
Авторы
М.В.Жучков*1,2, Е.Е.Жильцова1, Р.Р.Шилин1,2, С.А.Родионова2
1. ФГБОУ ВО «Рязанский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П.Павлова» Минздрава России.
390026, Россия, Рязань, ул. Высоковольтная, д. 9;
2. ГБУ РО «Областной клинический кожно-венерологический диспансер». 390046, Россия, Рязань, ул. Спортивная, д. 9
*misha.juchkov@gmail.com
1. I.P.Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 390026, Russian Federation, Ryazan, ul. Vysokovol'tnaia, d. 9;
2. Ryazan State Regional Dermato-Venerological Clinic.
390046, Russian Federation, Ryazan, ul. Sportivnaia, d. 9
*misha.juchkov@gmail.com
1. ФГБОУ ВО «Рязанский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П.Павлова» Минздрава России.
390026, Россия, Рязань, ул. Высоковольтная, д. 9;
2. ГБУ РО «Областной клинический кожно-венерологический диспансер». 390046, Россия, Рязань, ул. Спортивная, д. 9
*misha.juchkov@gmail.com
________________________________________________
1. I.P.Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 390026, Russian Federation, Ryazan, ul. Vysokovol'tnaia, d. 9;
2. Ryazan State Regional Dermato-Venerological Clinic.
390046, Russian Federation, Ryazan, ul. Sportivnaia, d. 9
*misha.juchkov@gmail.com
Цель портала OmniDoctor – предоставление профессиональной информации врачам, провизорам и фармацевтам.