В статье рассмотрены общность и различие патогенеза отечного синдрома при хронической сердечной недостаточности и циррозе печени, точки приложения разных подгрупп диуретиков. В реальной клинической практике недостаточно используются режим ограничения потребления соли и возможности применения спиронолактона, эплеренона и ацетазоламида. Торасемид является более востребованным диуретиком в сравнении с фуросемидом в связи с лучшим фармакодинамическим профилем и уровнем безопасности. Торасемид – это лекарственное средство с антиальдостероновым и антигипертензивным свойствами, обладающее дозозависимым диуретическим эффектом. В дозировках 2,5–5 мг оказывает преимущественно антигипертензивное и антиальдостеровое действие со слабым натрийуретическим эффектом, что позволяет использовать торасемид для ежедневной постоянной терапии артериальной гипертензии. В средних дозах 5–20 мг наиболее часто применяется для лечения отечного синдрома как в качестве монотерапии, так и в комбинации с другими диуретическими препаратами за исключением петлевых диуретиков. Антиальдостероновый механизм, в основе которого лежит способность торасемида блокировать альдостероновые рецепторы в почках, сердце и снижать секрецию альдостерона надпочечниками, обеспечивает замедление процессов ремоделирования сердца при хронической сердечной недостаточности и позитивные эффекты для лечения отеков разного генеза.
The article covers similarities and differences of edema syndrome pathogenesis in congestive heart failure and hepatic cirrhosis as well as sites of action of different diuretics types. The regimen of salt restriction and such medications as spironolactone, eplerenone and acetazolamide are not widely used in everyday clinical practice. Compared with furosemide, torasemide is a more popular diuretic because of better pharmacodynamics profile and safety. Torasemide is a pharmacologic agent with anti-aldosterone and antihypertensive effects. It also has dose-related diuretic effect. When used in dosage of 2.5–5 mg it predominantly has antihypertensive and anti-aldosterone effects with weak natriuretic action that allows its use in everyday hypertension therapy. In medium dosage of 5–20 mg it is more often used in edema syndrome treatment whether in monotherapy or in combination with other diuretics except for loop diuretics. The anti-aldosterone mechanism is based on torasemide ability to block aldosterone receptors in kidneys and heart and lower aldosteron secretion in adrenal glands. It allows to slow down remodeling processes of heart muscle in patients with congestive heart failure and explains positive effects in edema of different genesis management.
1. Moore КP, Aithal GР. Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis. Gut 2006; 55 (Suppl. 6): 1–12.
2. Méndez-Sánchez N, Villa AR, Zamora-Valdés D et al. World wide mortality from cirrhosis. Ann Hepatol 2007; 6 (3): 194–5.
3. Bosetti C, Levi F. World wide mortality from cirrhosis: an update to 2002, 2007. J Hepatol 2007; 46 (5): 827–39.
4. Schrier RW. Use of diuretics in heart failure and cirrhosis. Seminarsin Nephrol 2011; 31 (6): 503–12.
5. Pericoand N, Remuzzi G. Edema of the nephrotic syndrome: the role of the atrial peptide system. Am J Kid Dis 1993; 22 (3): 355–66.
6. Лечение асцита, осложняющего цирроз печени у взрослых. Практическое руководство Всемирного гастроэнтерологического общества (ВГО). Рос. журн. гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии и колопроктологии. 2007; 17 (4): 82–8. / Lechenie astsita, oslozhniaiushchego tsirroz pecheni u vzroslykh. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo Vsemirnogo gastroenterologicheskogo obshchestva (VGO). Ros. zhurn. gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2007; 17 (4): 82–8. [in Russian]
7. SHEP cooperative research group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertesive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA 1991; 265: 3255–64.
8. Gosse P, Sheridan DJ, Zannad F et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients treated with indapamide SR 1.5 mg versus enalapril 20 mg: the LIVE study. Hypertens 2000; 18: 1465–75.
9. Medical research counsil working party. MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. BMJ 1985; 291: 97–104.
10. The ALLHAT officers and coordinators for the ALLHAT collaborative research group. Major outcomes in high – risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin – converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97.
11. Neaton JD, Grimm RH, Prineas RJ et al. Treatment of mild hypertension study. JAMA 1993; 270: 713–24.
12. Dahlof B, Lindholm LH, Hansson L et al. Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with hypertension (STOP – Hypertension). Lancet 1991; 338: 1281–5.
13. Marre M, Puig JG, Kokot F et al. Equivalence of indapamide SR and enalapril on microalbuminuria reduction in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the NESTOR study. Hypertens 2004; 22: 1613–22.
15. Пономарева А.И., Кетова Г.Г., Компаниец О.Г. Клинико-фармакологические приоритеты в выборе блокаторов ренин-ангиотензиновой системы и диуретиков у пациентов с неосложненной гипертонической болезнью. Системные гипертензии. 2017; 14 (2): 75–9. DOI: 10.26442/2075-082X_14.2.75-79 / Ponomareva A.I., Ketova G.G., Kompaniets O.G. Clinical-pharmacological priorities in the election of blockators of the renin-angiotenzine system and diuretics in patients with uncompleted hypertension. Systemic Hypertension. 2017; 14 (2): 75–9. DOI: 10.26442/2075-082X_14.2.75-79 [in Russian]
16. Линчак Р.М. Сравнительная эффективность фиксированной комбинации периндоприл/индапамид у больных артериальной гипертензией различного пола и возраста. Кардиология. 2010; 50 (6): 35–40. / Linchak R.M. Sravnitelnaia effektivnost fiksirovannoi kombinatsii perindopril/indapamid u bolnykh arterialnoi gipertenziei razlichnogo pola i vozrasta. Kardiologiia. 2010; 50 (6): 35–40. [in Russian]
17. Линчак Р.М., Шумилова К.М., Мартынюк А.Д. и др. Применение комбинированного препарата лозартана и гидрохлортиазида в антигипертензивной терапии. Рацион. фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2006; 2 (1): 18–26. / Linchak R.M., Shumilova K.M., Martyniuk A.D. i dr. Primenenie kombinirovannogo preparata lozartana i gidrokhlortiazida v antigipertenzivnoi terapii. Ratsion. farmakoterapiia v kardiologii. 2006; 2 (1): 18–26. [in Russian]
18. Uchida T, Yamanaga K, Nishikawa M et al. Anti-aldosteronergic effect of torasemide. Eur J Pharmacol 1991; 205: 145–50.
19. Goodfriend TL, Ball DL, Oelkers W et al. Torasemide inhibits aldosterone secretion in vitro. Life Sci 1998; 63: 45–50.
20. Domanski M, Norman J, Pitt B et al. Diuretic use, progressive heart failure, and death in patients in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 705–8.
22. Murray MD, Deer MM, Ferguson JA et al. Open-label randomized trial of torasemide compared with furosemide therapy for patients with heart failure. Am J Med 2001; 111: 513–20.
23. Cosín J, Díez J. TORIC investigators. Torasemide in chronic heart failure: results of the TORIC study. Eur J Heart Fail 2002; 4: 507–13.
24. Vargo DL, Kramer WG, Black PK et al. Bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of torsemide and furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 57: 601–9.
25. Harada K et al. Beneficial Effects of Torasemide on Systolic Wall Stress and Sympathetic Nervous Activity in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Patients With Heart Failure: Comparison With Azosemide. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2009; 53: 468–73.
26. Yamato M, Sasaki T, Honda K et al. Effects of torasemide in left ventricular function and neurohumoral factors in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ J 2003; 67 (5): 384–90.
27. Mуller K, Gamba G, Jaquet F, Hess B. Torasemide vs. furosemide in primary care patients with chronic heart failure NYHA II to IV – efficacy and quality of life. Eur J Heart Fail 2003; 5 (6): 793–801.
28. Пономарева А.И., Компаниец О.Г., Линчак Р.М. и др. Фармакоэпидемиологическое исследование диуретиков при лечении гипертонической болезни в амбулаторных условиях. Системные гипертензии. 2014; 3: 48–53. / Ponomareva A.I., Kompaniets O.G., Linchak R.M. et al. Pharmacoepidemiological study of recommendations of diuretics for the treatment of hypertension in the outpatient setting. Systemic Hypertension. 2014; 3: 48–53. [in Russian]
29. Lopez B, Gonzalez A, Hermida N et al. Myocardial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease: potential benefits of torasemide. Kidney Int 2008; 111: 19–23.
30. Coca A. Effect of torasemide in monotherapy or associated to other antihypertensive drugs on pulse pressure in essential hypertension. Amer J Hypertens 2002; 15: 113–4.
32. Wargo KA, Banta WM. A comprehensive review of the loop diuretics: should furosemide be first line? Ann Pharm 2009; 43 (11): 1836–47.
33. Dinicolantonio JJ. Should torsemide be the loop diuretic of choice in systolic heart failure? Future Cardiol 2012; 8 (5): 707–28.
34. Murray MD, Deer MM, Ferguson JA et al. Openlabel randomized trial of torsemide compared with furosemide therapy for patients with heart failure. Am J Med 2011; 111 (7): 513–20.
35. Barbanoj MJ, Ballester MR, Antonijoan RM et al. A bioavailability/bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic study of two oral doses of torasemide (5 and 10 mg): prolonged release versus the conventional formulation. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2009; 36: 469–77.
36. Müller K, Gamba G, Jaquet F, Hess B. Torasemide vs furosemide in primary care patients with chronic heart failure NYHA II to IV – efficacy and quality of life. Eur J Heart Fail 2003; 5: 793–801.
37. Brater DC. Benefits and risks of torasemide in congestive heart failure and essential hypertension. Drug Saf 1996; 14: 104–20.
38. Mentz RJ, Stevens SR, DeVore AD et al. Decongestion strategies and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation in acute heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2015; 3: 97–107.
39. Lantis AC, Ames MK, Werre S, Atkins CE. The effect of enalapril on furosemide-activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2015; 38: 513–7.
40. Francis GS. The relationship of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin–angiotensin system in congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 642–8.
41. Wang W. Chronic administration of aldosterone depresses baroreceptor reflex function in the dog. Hypertens 1994; 24: 571–5.
42. MacFadyen RJ, Barr CS, Struthers AD. Aldosterone blockade reduces vascular collagen turnover, improves heart rate variability and reduces early morning rise in heart rate in heart failure patients. Cardiovasc Res 1997; 35: 30–4.
43. Борцова М.А., Ситникова М.Ю., Дорофейков В.В., Федотов П.А. Возможности коррекции суточного профиля артериального давления у больных с тяжелой сердечной недостаточностью: исследование ФУТОР (фуросемид/торасемид). Артериальная гипертензия. 2009; 15 (2): 126–31. / Bortsova M.A., Sitnikova M.Yu., Dorofeikov V.V., Fedotov P.A. Vozmozhnosti korrektsii sutochnogo profilia arterial'nogo davleniia u bol'nykh s tiazheloi serdechnoi nedostatochnost'iu: issledovanie FUTOR (furosemid/torasemid). Arterial'naia gipertenziia. 2009; 15 (2): 126–31. [in Russian]
44. Perez-Ayuso RM, Arroyo V, Planas R et al. Randomized comparative study of efficacy of furosemide versus spironolactone in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites. Relationship between the diuretic response and the activity of the reninaldosterone system. Gastroenterology 1983; 84 (5): 961–8.
45. Perri GA. Ascites in patients with cirrhosis. Can Family Physician 2013; 59 (12): 1297–9.
46. Qavi AH, Kamal R, Schrier RW. Clinical Use of Diuretics in Heart Failure, Cirrhosis, and Nephrotic Syndrome. Int J Nephrol 2015; 2015: 975934. DOI: 10.1155/2015/975934
47. Fiaccadori F, Pasetti GC, Pedretti G et al. Comparative analysis of torasemide and furosemide in liver cirrhosis. Cardiology 1994; 84 (2): 80–6.
48. Fiaccadori F, Pasetti GC, Pedretti G et al. Torasemide versus furosemide in cirrhosis: a long-term, double-blind, randomized clinical study. Clin Investig 1993; 71 (7): 579–84.
49. Kalambokis G, Economou M, Kosta P et al. The effects of treatment with octreotide, diuretics, or both on portal hemodynamics in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40 (4): 342–6.
50. Компаниец О.Г., Аверин Е.Е. Приоритеты выбора диуретиков при лечении гипертонической болезни: доказательная медицина, рекомендательные документы и реальная клиническая практика. Системные гипертензии. 2013; 10 (1): 62–5. / Kompaniets O.G., Averin E.E. Priorities for choosing diuretics in the treatment of hypertensive disease: Evidence-based medicine, recommendation documents, and real clinical practice. Systemic Hypertension. 2013; 10 (1): 62–5. [in Russian]
51. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 709–17.
52. Bоlke T, Achhammer I. Torasemide: review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use. Drugs Today 1994; 8: 1–28.
53. Фомин В.В. Антиальдостероновое действие торасемида: случайность или необходимость? РМЖ. Кардиология. 2012; 14: 693–7. / Fomin V.V. Antial'dosteronovoe deistvie torasemida: sluchainost' ili neobkhodimost'? RMZh. Kardiologiia. 2012; 14: 693–7. [in Russian]
54. 2017 ACC Expert Consensus decision pathway for optimization of heart failure treatment: answers to 10 pivotal issues about heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.025
55. Рекомендации ESC по диагностике и лечению острой и хронической сердечной недостаточности 2016. Рос. кардиол. журн. 2017; 1 (141): 81. / Rekomendatsii ESC po diagnostike i lecheniiu ostroi i khronicheskoi serdechnoi nedostatochnosti 2016. Ros. kardiol. zhurn. 2017; 1 (141): 81. [in Russian]
56. Сычев Д.А., Умарова А.Р., Богдан З.А. Клинико-фармакологические аспекты применения торасемида при артериальной гипертензии. Кардиология. 2012; 4: 170. / Sychev D.A., Umarova A.R., Bogdan Z.A. Kliniko-farmakologicheskie aspekty primeneniia torasemida pri arterial'noi gipertenzii. Kardiologiia. 2012; 4: 170. [in Russian]
57. Balsam P, Ozieranski K, Tyminska A et al. The impact of torasemide on haemodynamic and neurohormonal stress, and cardiac remodelling in heart failure – TORNADO: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18: 36. DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1760
58. Stroupe KT, Forthofer MM, Brater DC, Murray MD. Healthcare costs of patients with heart failure treated with torasemide or furosemide. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 17: 429–40.
59. Buggey J, Mentz RJ, Pitt B et al. A reappraisal of loop diuretic choice in heart failure patients. Am Heart J 2015; 169: 323–34.
60. Mamcarz A, Filipiak KJ, Drożdż J et al. Loop diuretics: old and new ones – which one to choose in clinical practice? Experts’ Group Consensus endorsed by the Polish Cardiac Society Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy and Working Group on Heart Failure. Kardiol Pol 2015; 73: 225–32.
61. Young M, Plosker GL. Torasemide: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19: 679–703.
62. Spannheimer A, Goertz A, Dreckmann-Behrendt B. Comparison of therapies with torasemide or furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure from a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint. Int J Clin Pract 1998; 52: 467–71.
63. Пономарева А.И., Компаниец О.Г., Линчак Р.М. и др. Фармакоэпидемиологическое исследование диуретиков при лечении гипертонической болезни в амбулаторных условиях. Системные гипертензии. 2014; 11 (3): 48–52. / Ponomareva A.I., Kompaniets O.G., Linchak R.M. et al. Pharmacoepidemiological study of recommendations of diuretics for the treatment of hypertension in the outpatient setting. Systemic Hypertension. 2014; 11 (3): 48–52. [in Russian]
________________________________________________
1. Moore КP, Aithal GР. Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis. Gut 2006; 55 (Suppl. 6): 1–12.
2. Méndez-Sánchez N, Villa AR, Zamora-Valdés D et al. World wide mortality from cirrhosis. Ann Hepatol 2007; 6 (3): 194–5.
3. Bosetti C, Levi F. World wide mortality from cirrhosis: an update to 2002, 2007. J Hepatol 2007; 46 (5): 827–39.
4. Schrier RW. Use of diuretics in heart failure and cirrhosis. Seminarsin Nephrol 2011; 31 (6): 503–12.
5. Pericoand N, Remuzzi G. Edema of the nephrotic syndrome: the role of the atrial peptide system. Am J Kid Dis 1993; 22 (3): 355–66.
6. Lechenie astsita, oslozhniaiushchego tsirroz pecheni u vzroslykh. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo Vsemirnogo gastroenterologicheskogo obshchestva (VGO). Ros. zhurn. gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2007; 17 (4): 82–8. [in Russian]
7. SHEP cooperative research group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertesive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA 1991; 265: 3255–64.
8. Gosse P, Sheridan DJ, Zannad F et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients treated with indapamide SR 1.5 mg versus enalapril 20 mg: the LIVE study. Hypertens 2000; 18: 1465–75.
9. Medical research counsil working party. MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. BMJ 1985; 291: 97–104.
10. The ALLHAT officers and coordinators for the ALLHAT collaborative research group. Major outcomes in high – risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin – converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97.
11. Neaton JD, Grimm RH, Prineas RJ et al. Treatment of mild hypertension study. JAMA 1993; 270: 713–24.
12. Dahlof B, Lindholm LH, Hansson L et al. Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with hypertension (STOP – Hypertension). Lancet 1991; 338: 1281–5.
13. Marre M, Puig JG, Kokot F et al. Equivalence of indapamide SR and enalapril on microalbuminuria reduction in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the NESTOR study. Hypertens 2004; 22: 1613–22.
15. Ponomareva A.I., Ketova G.G., Kompaniets O.G. Clinical-pharmacological priorities in the election of blockators of the renin-angiotenzine system and diuretics in patients with uncompleted hypertension. Systemic Hypertension. 2017; 14 (2): 75–9. DOI: 10.26442/2075-082X_14.2.75-79 [in Russian]
16. Linchak R.M. Sravnitelnaia effektivnost fiksirovannoi kombinatsii perindopril/indapamid u bolnykh arterialnoi gipertenziei razlichnogo pola i vozrasta. Kardiologiia. 2010; 50 (6): 35–40. [in Russian]
17. Linchak R.M., Shumilova K.M., Martyniuk A.D. i dr. Primenenie kombinirovannogo preparata lozartana i gidrokhlortiazida v antigipertenzivnoi terapii. Ratsion. farmakoterapiia v kardiologii. 2006; 2 (1): 18–26. [in Russian]
18. Uchida T, Yamanaga K, Nishikawa M et al. Anti-aldosteronergic effect of torasemide. Eur J Pharmacol 1991; 205: 145–50.
19. Goodfriend TL, Ball DL, Oelkers W et al. Torasemide inhibits aldosterone secretion in vitro. Life Sci 1998; 63: 45–50.
20. Domanski M, Norman J, Pitt B et al. Diuretic use, progressive heart failure, and death in patients in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 705–8.
22. Murray MD, Deer MM, Ferguson JA et al. Open-label randomized trial of torasemide compared with furosemide therapy for patients with heart failure. Am J Med 2001; 111: 513–20.
23. Cosín J, Díez J. TORIC investigators. Torasemide in chronic heart failure: results of the TORIC study. Eur J Heart Fail 2002; 4: 507–13.
24. Vargo DL, Kramer WG, Black PK et al. Bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of torsemide and furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 57: 601–9.
25. Harada K et al. Beneficial Effects of Torasemide on Systolic Wall Stress and Sympathetic Nervous Activity in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Patients With Heart Failure: Comparison With Azosemide. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2009; 53: 468–73.
26. Yamato M, Sasaki T, Honda K et al. Effects of torasemide in left ventricular function and neurohumoral factors in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ J 2003; 67 (5): 384–90.
27. Mуller K, Gamba G, Jaquet F, Hess B. Torasemide vs. furosemide in primary care patients with chronic heart failure NYHA II to IV – efficacy and quality of life. Eur J Heart Fail 2003; 5 (6): 793–801.
28. Ponomareva A.I., Kompaniets O.G., Linchak R.M. et al. Pharmacoepidemiological study of recommendations of diuretics for the treatment of hypertension in the outpatient setting. Systemic Hypertension. 2014; 3: 48–53. [in Russian]
29. Lopez B, Gonzalez A, Hermida N et al. Myocardial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease: potential benefits of torasemide. Kidney Int 2008; 111: 19–23.
30. Coca A. Effect of torasemide in monotherapy or associated to other antihypertensive drugs on pulse pressure in essential hypertension. Amer J Hypertens 2002; 15: 113–4.
32. Wargo KA, Banta WM. A comprehensive review of the loop diuretics: should furosemide be first line? Ann Pharm 2009; 43 (11): 1836–47.
33. Dinicolantonio JJ. Should torsemide be the loop diuretic of choice in systolic heart failure? Future Cardiol 2012; 8 (5): 707–28.
34. Murray MD, Deer MM, Ferguson JA et al. Openlabel randomized trial of torsemide compared with furosemide therapy for patients with heart failure. Am J Med 2011; 111 (7): 513–20.
35. Barbanoj MJ, Ballester MR, Antonijoan RM et al. A bioavailability/bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic study of two oral doses of torasemide (5 and 10 mg): prolonged release versus the conventional formulation. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2009; 36: 469–77.
36. Müller K, Gamba G, Jaquet F, Hess B. Torasemide vs furosemide in primary care patients with chronic heart failure NYHA II to IV – efficacy and quality of life. Eur J Heart Fail 2003; 5: 793–801.
37. Brater DC. Benefits and risks of torasemide in congestive heart failure and essential hypertension. Drug Saf 1996; 14: 104–20.
38. Mentz RJ, Stevens SR, DeVore AD et al. Decongestion strategies and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation in acute heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2015; 3: 97–107.
39. Lantis AC, Ames MK, Werre S, Atkins CE. The effect of enalapril on furosemide-activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2015; 38: 513–7.
40. Francis GS. The relationship of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin–angiotensin system in congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 642–8.
41. Wang W. Chronic administration of aldosterone depresses baroreceptor reflex function in the dog. Hypertens 1994; 24: 571–5.
42. MacFadyen RJ, Barr CS, Struthers AD. Aldosterone blockade reduces vascular collagen turnover, improves heart rate variability and reduces early morning rise in heart rate in heart failure patients. Cardiovasc Res 1997; 35: 30–4.
44. Perez-Ayuso RM, Arroyo V, Planas R et al. Randomized comparative study of efficacy of furosemide versus spironolactone in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites. Relationship between the diuretic response and the activity of the reninaldosterone system. Gastroenterology 1983; 84 (5): 961–8.
45. Perri GA. Ascites in patients with cirrhosis. Can Family Physician 2013; 59 (12): 1297–9.
46. Qavi AH, Kamal R, Schrier RW. Clinical Use of Diuretics in Heart Failure, Cirrhosis, and Nephrotic Syndrome. Int J Nephrol 2015; 2015: 975934. DOI: 10.1155/2015/975934
47. Fiaccadori F, Pasetti GC, Pedretti G et al. Comparative analysis of torasemide and furosemide in liver cirrhosis. Cardiology 1994; 84 (2): 80–6.
48. Fiaccadori F, Pasetti GC, Pedretti G et al. Torasemide versus furosemide in cirrhosis: a long-term, double-blind, randomized clinical study. Clin Investig 1993; 71 (7): 579–84.
49. Kalambokis G, Economou M, Kosta P et al. The effects of treatment with octreotide, diuretics, or both on portal hemodynamics in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40 (4): 342–6.
50. Kompaniets O.G., Averin E.E. Priorities for choosing diuretics in the treatment of hypertensive disease: Evidence-based medicine, recommendation documents, and real clinical practice. Systemic Hypertension. 2013; 10 (1): 62–5. [in Russian]
51. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 709–17.
52. Bоlke T, Achhammer I. Torasemide: review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use. Drugs Today 1994; 8: 1–28.
57. Balsam P, Ozieranski K, Tyminska A et al. The impact of torasemide on haemodynamic and neurohormonal stress, and cardiac remodelling in heart failure – TORNADO: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18: 36. DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1760
58. Stroupe KT, Forthofer MM, Brater DC, Murray MD. Healthcare costs of patients with heart failure treated with torasemide or furosemide. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 17: 429–40.
59. Buggey J, Mentz RJ, Pitt B et al. A reappraisal of loop diuretic choice in heart failure patients. Am Heart J 2015; 169: 323–34.
60. Mamcarz A, Filipiak KJ, Drożdż J et al. Loop diuretics: old and new ones – which one to choose in clinical practice? Experts’ Group Consensus endorsed by the Polish Cardiac Society Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy and Working Group on Heart Failure. Kardiol Pol 2015; 73: 225–32.
61. Young M, Plosker GL. Torasemide: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19: 679–703.
62. Spannheimer A, Goertz A, Dreckmann-Behrendt B. Comparison of therapies with torasemide or furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure from a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint. Int J Clin Pract 1998; 52: 467–71.
63. Ponomareva A.I., Kompaniets O.G., Linchak R.M. et al. Pharmacoepidemiological study of recommendations of diuretics for the treatment of hypertension in the outpatient setting. Systemic Hypertension. 2014; 11 (3): 48–52. [in Russian]
1 ФГБОУ ВО «Южно-Уральский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России. 454092, Россия, Челябинск, ул. Воровского, д. 64;
2 ГБУЗ «Научно-исследовательский институт – Краевая клиническая больница №1 им. проф. С.В.Очаповского» Минздрава Краснодарского края. 350029, Россия, Краснодар, ул. 1 Мая, д. 16;
3 ФГБОУ ВО «Саратовский государственный медицинский университет им. В.И.Разумовского» Минздрава России. 410012, Россия, Саратов, ул. Большая Казачья, д. 112
1South Ural State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 454092, Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk, ul. Vorovskogo, d. 64;
2S.V.Ochapovsky Clinical Hospital №1 of the Ministry of Health of the Krasnodar Region. 350029, Russian Federation, Krasnodar, ul. 1 Maia, d. 16;
3V.I.Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 410012, Russian Federation, Saratov, ul. Bol'shaia Kazach'ia, d. 112