Достижения современной гастроэнтерологии в оценке нарушений тонуса и моторики пищевода
Достижения современной гастроэнтерологии в оценке нарушений тонуса и моторики пищевода
Маев И.В., Баркалова Е.В., Овсепян М.А. и др. Достижения современной гастроэнтерологии в оценке нарушений тонуса и моторики пищевода. Consilium Medicum. 2018; 20 (8): 8–13. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2018.8.8-13
________________________________________________
Maev I.V., Barkalova E.V., Ovsepyan M.A. et al. Modern gastroenterology advances in esophageal tonus and motility disorders assessment. Consilium Medicum. 2018; 20 (8): 8–13. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2018.8.8-13
Достижения современной гастроэнтерологии в оценке нарушений тонуса и моторики пищевода
Маев И.В., Баркалова Е.В., Овсепян М.А. и др. Достижения современной гастроэнтерологии в оценке нарушений тонуса и моторики пищевода. Consilium Medicum. 2018; 20 (8): 8–13. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2018.8.8-13
________________________________________________
Maev I.V., Barkalova E.V., Ovsepyan M.A. et al. Modern gastroenterology advances in esophageal tonus and motility disorders assessment. Consilium Medicum. 2018; 20 (8): 8–13. DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2018.8.8-13
Обзор литературы посвящен современному методу диагностики – манометрии пищевода высокого разрешения как одному из достижений современной гастроэнтерологии в оценке нарушений тонуса и моторики пищевода. Манометрия пищевода позволяет детально оценить моторную функцию пищевода на всем его протяжении, включая верхний пищеводный сфинктер, грудной отдел пищевода и нижний пищеводный сфинктер благодаря использованию высокочувствительных многоканальных катетеров с оценкой результатов с помощью компьютерного полихромного изображения. Представлены параметры манометрического исследования, на основании которых строится заключение согласно Чикагской классификации 3-го пересмотра. Освещены вопросы этиологии, патогенеза, клинической картины, а также диагностические критерии и подходы к лечению нарушений функции нижнего пищеводного сфинктера, основных и незначительных нарушений перистальтики грудного отдела пищевода.
The literature review addresses a modern diagnostics method – high-resolution esophageal manometry as one of the advances in up-to-date gastroenterology for esophageal tonus and motility disorders assessment. Esophageal manometry allows to estimate the esophageal motor function in detail along its entire length, including the upper esophageal sphincter, thoracic esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter through the use of highly-sensitive multilumen catheters and evaluation of the results with the use of computerized polychrome image data. The parameters of manometry study on the basis of which clinical conclusion is made according to Chicago classification version 3.0 are presented. The issues of etiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, as well as diagnostic criteria and treatment approaches to lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction, main and minor thoracic esophagus motility disorders are covered.
1. El-Serag H, Sweet S, Winchester C, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2014; 63: 871–80.
2. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Трухманов А.С. и др. Клинические рекомендации Российской гастроэнтерологической ассоциации по диагностике и лечению гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни. Рос. журн. гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии и колопроктологии. 2017; 27 (4): 75–95. / Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. i dr. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Rossiiskoi gastroenterologicheskoi assotsiatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu gastroezofageal'noi reflyuksnoi bolezni. Ros. zhurn. gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2017; 27 (4): 75–95. [in Russian]
3. Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration JAMA. Oncol 2015; 1 (4): 505–27.
4. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Трухманов А.С. Пищевод Баррета. М.: Шико, 2011. / Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. Pishchevod Barreta. M.: Shiko, 2011. [in Russian]
5. Moawad F. Eosinophilic esophagitis: incidence and prevalence. Gastrointest Endosc Clin 2018; 28 (1): 15–25.
6. Gyawali C. High resolution manometry: the Ray Clouse legacy. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24 (Suppl. 1): 2–4.
7. Маев И.В., Баркалова Е.В, Овсепян М.А. и др. Применение манометрии пищевода высокого разрешения в клинической практике: серия наблюдений. Клин. медицина. 2017; 95 (12). / Maev I.V., Barkalova E.V, Ovsepyan M.A. i dr. Primenenie manometrii pishchevoda vysokogo razresheniya v klinicheskoi praktike: seriya nablyudenii. Klin. meditsina. 2017; 95 (12). [in Russian]
8. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Трухманов А.С. и др. Манометрия высокого разрешения и новая классификация нарушений моторики пищевода. Терапевтический архив. 2018; 5: 93–100. / Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. i dr. Manometriya vysokogo razresheniya i novaya klassifikatsiya narushenii motoriki pishchevoda. Therapeutic Archive. 2018; 5: 93–100. [in Russian]
9. Kahrilas P, Bredenoord A, Fox M et al. The Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27 (2): 160–74.
10. Fox M, Kahrilas P, Roman S et al. International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function. Clinical measurement of gastrointestinal motility and function: who, when and which test? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 15 (5): 323.
11. Gyawali C, Kahrilas P, Savarino E et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus Gut 2018; 2. PII: gutjnl-2017-314722.
12. Fornari F, Bravi I, Penagini R et al. Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21 (7): 718-e41.
13. Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J et al. Multiple Rapid Swallow Responses During Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Reflect Esophageal Body Peristaltic Reserve. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108 (11): 1706–12.
14. Marin I, Serra J. Patterns of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28: 543–53.
15. Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B et al. Rapid Drink Challenge in high-resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29: e12902.
16. Elvevi A, Mauro A, Pugliese D et al. Usefulness of low- and high-volume multiple rapid swallowing during high-resolution manometry. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47: 103–7.
17. Ивашкин В.Т., Трухманов А.С., Годжелло Э.А. и др. Рекомендации Российской гастроэнтерологической ассоциации по диагностике и лечению ахалазии кардии и кардиоспазма. Рос. журн. гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии и колопроктологии. 2016; 26 (4): 36–54. / Ivashkin V.T., Trukhmanov A.S., Godzhello E.A. i dr. Rekomendatsii Rossiiskoi gastroenterologicheskoi assotsiatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu akhalazii kardii i kardiospazma. Ros. zhurn. gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2016; 26 (4): 36–54. [in Russian]
18. Баркалова Е.В., Кучерявый Ю.А., Маев И.В. Манометрия высокого разрешения в диагностике нарушений двигательной функции пищевода. Мед. совет. 2018; 3: 104–10. / Barkalova E.V., Kucheryavyi Yu.A., Maev I.V. Manometriya vysokogo razresheniya v diagnostike narushenii dvigatel'noi funktsii pishchevoda. Med. sovet. 2018; 3: 104–10. [in Russian]
19. Rohof W, Salvador R, Annese V et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 2013; 144, 718–25.
20. Khan M, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S et al. Is POEM the answer for management of spastic esophageal disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62, 35–44.
21. Ponds FA et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) versus pneumatic dilation in therapy-naïve patients with achalasia: results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: S139.
22. Kahrilas P, Bredenoord A, Fox M et al. Expert consensus document: Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 14 (11): 677–88.
23. Pérez-Fernández M, Santander C, Marinero A et al. Characterization and follow-up of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28: 116–126.
24. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T et al. Assessment of esophageal dysfunction and symptoms during and after a standardized test meal: development and clinical validation of a new methodology utilizing high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 215–228.
25. Sabine R, Kahrilas P. Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013; 42 (1): 27–43.
26. Herregods T, Smout A, Ooi J et al. Jackhammer esophagus: observations on a European cohort. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29.
27. Gullo R, Inviati A, Almasio P et al. A functional study of the esophagus in patients with non-cardiac chest pain and dysphagia. Turk J Gastroenterol 2015; 26: 99–103.
28. Huang L, Pimentel M, Rezaie A. Do Jackhammer contractions lead to achalasia? A longitudinal study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29.
29. Bechara R, Ikeda H, Inoue H. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Jackhammer esophagus: to cut or not to cut the lower esophageal sphincter. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4 (5): E585–8.
30. Goel R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Wilkinson M. A Jackhammer in the gullet: high amplitude oesophageal contractions as a cause of atypical chest pain. BMJ Case Rep 2015. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2015-210631
31. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Трухманов А.С. и др. Клинические рекомендации Российской гастроэнтерологической ассоциации по диагностике и лечению дисфагии. Рос. журн. гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии и колопроктологии. 2015; 5: 84–93. / Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. i dr. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Rossiiskoi gastroenterologicheskoi assotsiatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu disfagii. Ros. zhurn. gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2015; 5: 84–93. [in Russian]
32. Creamer B, Donoghue E, Code C. Pattern of esophageal motility in diffuse spasm. Gastroenterology 1958; 34: 782–96.
33. Roman S, Kahrilas P. Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus. Gastroenterol clin North Am 2013; 42: 27–43.
34. Tutuian R, Mainie I, Agrawal A et al. Symptom and Function Heterogenicity Among Patients with Distal Esophageal Spasm: Studies Using Combined Impedance-Manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 464–9.
35. Khalaf M, Chowdhary S, Elias P, Castell D. Distal Esophageal Spasm: A Review. Am J Med 2018. PII: S0002-9343(18)30284-5
36. Rerych K, Kurek J, Klimacka-Nawrot E. High-resolution manometry in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after fundoplication. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 23: 55–63.
37. Rohof W, Bredenoord A. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2017, 19 (8): 37.
38. Laique S, Singh T, Dornblaser D et al. Clinical Characteristics and Associated Systemic Diseases in Patients With Esophageal "Absent Contractility": A Clinical Algorithm. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000989
39. Tutuian R, Castell D. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1011–9.
40. Porter R, Kumar N, Drapekin J, Gyawali C. Fragmented esophageal smooth muscle contraction segments on high resolution manometry: a marker of esophageal hypomotility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: 763–8.
________________________________________________
1. El-Serag H, Sweet S, Winchester C, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2014; 63: 871–80.
2. Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. i dr. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Rossiiskoi gastroenterologicheskoi assotsiatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu gastroezofageal'noi reflyuksnoi bolezni. Ros. zhurn. gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2017; 27 (4): 75–95. [in Russian]
3. Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration JAMA. Oncol 2015; 1 (4): 505–27.
4. Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. Pishchevod Barreta. M.: Shiko, 2011. [in Russian]
5. Moawad F. Eosinophilic esophagitis: incidence and prevalence. Gastrointest Endosc Clin 2018; 28 (1): 15–25.
6. Gyawali C. High resolution manometry: the Ray Clouse legacy. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24 (Suppl. 1): 2–4.
7. Maev I.V., Barkalova E.V, Ovsepyan M.A. i dr. Primenenie manometrii pishchevoda vysokogo razresheniya v klinicheskoi praktike: seriya nablyudenii. Klin. meditsina. 2017; 95 (12). [in Russian]
8. Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. i dr. Manometriya vysokogo razresheniya i novaya klassifikatsiya narushenii motoriki pishchevoda. Therapeutic Archive. 2018; 5: 93–100. [in Russian]
9. Kahrilas P, Bredenoord A, Fox M et al. The Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27 (2): 160–74.
10. Fox M, Kahrilas P, Roman S et al. International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function. Clinical measurement of gastrointestinal motility and function: who, when and which test? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 15 (5): 323.
11. Gyawali C, Kahrilas P, Savarino E et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus Gut 2018; 2. PII: gutjnl-2017-314722.
12. Fornari F, Bravi I, Penagini R et al. Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21 (7): 718-e41.
13. Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J et al. Multiple Rapid Swallow Responses During Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Reflect Esophageal Body Peristaltic Reserve. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108 (11): 1706–12.
14. Marin I, Serra J. Patterns of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28: 543–53.
15. Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B et al. Rapid Drink Challenge in high-resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29: e12902.
16. Elvevi A, Mauro A, Pugliese D et al. Usefulness of low- and high-volume multiple rapid swallowing during high-resolution manometry. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47: 103–7.
17. Ivashkin V.T., Trukhmanov A.S., Godzhello E.A. i dr. Rekomendatsii Rossiiskoi gastroenterologicheskoi assotsiatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu akhalazii kardii i kardiospazma. Ros. zhurn. gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2016; 26 (4): 36–54. [in Russian]
18. Barkalova E.V., Kucheryavyi Yu.A., Maev I.V. Manometriya vysokogo razresheniya v diagnostike narushenii dvigatel'noi funktsii pishchevoda. Med. sovet. 2018; 3: 104–10. [in Russian]
19. Rohof W, Salvador R, Annese V et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 2013; 144, 718–25.
20. Khan M, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S et al. Is POEM the answer for management of spastic esophageal disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62, 35–44.
21. Ponds FA et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) versus pneumatic dilation in therapy-naïve patients with achalasia: results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: S139.
22. Kahrilas P, Bredenoord A, Fox M et al. Expert consensus document: Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 14 (11): 677–88.
23. Pérez-Fernández M, Santander C, Marinero A et al. Characterization and follow-up of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28: 116–126.
24. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T et al. Assessment of esophageal dysfunction and symptoms during and after a standardized test meal: development and clinical validation of a new methodology utilizing high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 215–228.
25. Sabine R, Kahrilas P. Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013; 42 (1): 27–43.
26. Herregods T, Smout A, Ooi J et al. Jackhammer esophagus: observations on a European cohort. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29.
27. Gullo R, Inviati A, Almasio P et al. A functional study of the esophagus in patients with non-cardiac chest pain and dysphagia. Turk J Gastroenterol 2015; 26: 99–103.
28. Huang L, Pimentel M, Rezaie A. Do Jackhammer contractions lead to achalasia? A longitudinal study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29.
29. Bechara R, Ikeda H, Inoue H. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Jackhammer esophagus: to cut or not to cut the lower esophageal sphincter. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4 (5): E585–8.
30. Goel R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Wilkinson M. A Jackhammer in the gullet: high amplitude oesophageal contractions as a cause of atypical chest pain. BMJ Case Rep 2015. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2015-210631
31. Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. i dr. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Rossiiskoi gastroenterologicheskoi assotsiatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu disfagii. Ros. zhurn. gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2015; 5: 84–93. [in Russian]
32. Creamer B, Donoghue E, Code C. Pattern of esophageal motility in diffuse spasm. Gastroenterology 1958; 34: 782–96.
33. Roman S, Kahrilas P. Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus. Gastroenterol clin North Am 2013; 42: 27–43.
34. Tutuian R, Mainie I, Agrawal A et al. Symptom and Function Heterogenicity Among Patients with Distal Esophageal Spasm: Studies Using Combined Impedance-Manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 464–9.
35. Khalaf M, Chowdhary S, Elias P, Castell D. Distal Esophageal Spasm: A Review. Am J Med 2018. PII: S0002-9343(18)30284-5
36. Rerych K, Kurek J, Klimacka-Nawrot E. High-resolution manometry in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after fundoplication. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 23: 55–63.
37. Rohof W, Bredenoord A. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2017, 19 (8): 37.
38. Laique S, Singh T, Dornblaser D et al. Clinical Characteristics and Associated Systemic Diseases in Patients With Esophageal "Absent Contractility": A Clinical Algorithm. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000989
39. Tutuian R, Castell D. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1011–9.
40. Porter R, Kumar N, Drapekin J, Gyawali C. Fragmented esophageal smooth muscle contraction segments on high resolution manometry: a marker of esophageal hypomotility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: 763–8.
ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет им. А.И.Евдокимова» Минздрава России. 127473, Россия, Москва, ул. Делегатская, д. 20, стр. 1
*maslovaalena@mail.ru
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
*maslovaalena@mail.ru