Фибробласты дермы в фокусе современной косметологии: старение и ответ на косметологические процедуры

1. Штыркова Е.В. Фибробласты дермы. Источники дифференцировки, Пролиферативная активность и методы ее стимуляции. Вестник медицинского института «РЕАВИЗ». 2017;(6):43-50 [Shtyrkova EV. Fibroblasty dermy. Istochniki differentsirovki, Proliferativnaia aktivnost’ i metody ee stimuliatsii. Vestnik meditsinskogo instituta «REAVIZ». 2017;(6):43-50 (in Russian)]. 
2. Humphrey S, Brown SM, Cross SJ, Mehta R. Defining Skin Quality: Clinical Relevance, Terminology, and Assessment. Dermatol Surg. 2021;47(7):974-81. DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003079
3. Силина Е.В., Мантурова Н.Е., Моргулис Н.В., Ступин В.А. Физиология старения кожи. Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. 2020;(2):40‑5 [Silina EV, Manturova NE, Morgulis NV, Stupin VA. Physiology of skin aging. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2020;2:40-5 (in Russian)]. DOI:10.17116/plast.hirurgia202002140
4. Аравийская Е.Р. Изменения в перименопаузе: принципы современной комплексной коррекции. Клин дерм и вен. 2007;(2):97-100 [Araviiskaia ER. Izmeneniia v perimenopauze: printsipy sovremennoi kompleksnoi korrektsii. Klin derm i ven. 2007;(2):97-100 (in Russian)].
5. Аравийская Е.Р. Возрастные изменения в дерме: новые сведения и пути коррекции с помощью средств ежедневного ухода. Русский медицинский журнал. 2008;16(8):574-5 [Araviiskaia ER. Vozrastnye izmeneniia v derme: novye svedeniia i puti korrektsii s pomoshch’iu sredstv ezhednevnogo ukhoda. Russkii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2008;16(8):574-5 (in Russian)].
6. Альбертс Б., Джонсон А., Льюис Дж., и др. Фибробласты и их трансформации: семейство клеток соединительной ткани. Молекулярная биология клетки. 4-е изд. Нью-Йорк: Гарланд Наука, 2002 [Al’berts B, Dzhonson A, L’iuis Dzh, et al. Fibroblasty i ikh transformatsii: semeistvo kletok soedinitel’noi tkani. Molekuliarnaia biologiia kletki. 4-e izd. N’iu-Iork: Garland Nauka, 2002 (in Russian)].
7. Руководство по гистологии (в двух томах). Под ред. Р.К. Данилова. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. СПб.: СпецЛит, 2011 [Rukovodstvo po gistologii (v dvukh tomakh). Pod red. RK Danilova. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Saint Petersburg: SpetsLit, 2011 (in Russian)].
8. Dick MK, Miao JH, Limaiem F. Histology, Fibroblast. StatPearls [Internet]. 2023.
9. Афанасьев Ю.И., Юрина Н.А., Котовский Е.Ф., и др. Гистология, эмбриология, цитология. Учебник. Под ред. Ю.И. Афанасьева, Н.А. Юриной. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2020 [Afanas›ev IuI, Iurina NA, Kotovskii EF, et al. Gistologiia, embriologiia, tsitologiia. Uchebnik. Pod red. Iu.I. Afanas’eva, N.A. Iurinoi. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2020 (in Russian)].
10. Plikus MV, Wang X, Sinha S, at al. Fibroblasts: origins, definitions, and functions in health and disease. Cell. 2021;184(15):3852-82. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.024
11. Бозо И.Я., Деев Р.В., Пинаев Г.П. «Фибробласт» – специализированная клетка или функциональное состояние клеток мезенхимного происхождения. Цитология. 2010;52(2):99-109 [Bozo IIa, Deev RV, Pinaev GP. «Fibroblast» – spetsializirovannaia kletka ili funktsional’noe sostoianie kletok mezenkhimnogo proiskhozhdeniia. Tsitologiia. 2010;52(2):99-109 (in Russian)].
12. Kendall RT, Feghali-Bostwick CA. Fibroblasts in fibrosis: novel roles and mediators. Front Pharmacol. 2014;(5):123. DOI:10.3389/fphar.2014.00123
13. Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nate Rev Cancer. 2016;(16):582-98. DOI:10.1038/nrc.2016.73
14. Борзых О.Б., Шнайдер Н.А., Карпова Е.И., и др. Синтез коллагена в коже, его функциональные и структурные особенности. Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. 2021;16(4):443-50 [Borzykh OB, Shnaider NA, Karpova EI, et al. Sintez kollagena v kozhe, ego funktsional’nye i strukturnye osobennosti. Meditsinskii vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza. 2021;16(4):443-50 (in Russian)].
15. Zhu W, Dong C. Poly-L-Lactic acid increases collagen gene expression and synthesis in cultured dermal fibroblast (Hs68) through the TGF-β/Smad pathway. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(4):1213-9. DOI:10.1111/jocd.15571 
16. Stein P, Vitavska O, Kind P, et al. The biological basis for poly-l-lactic acid-induced augmentation. J Dermatol Sci. 2015;78(1):26-33. DOI:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2015.01.012
17. Омельяненко Н.П., Слуцкий Л.И. Соединительная ткань (гистофизиология и биохимия). М.: Известия, 2009. Т. 1 [Omel’ianenko NP, Slutskii LI. Soedinitel’naia tkan’ (gistofiziologiia i biokhimiia). Moscow: Izvestiia, 2009. T. 1 (in Russian)].
18. Chang HY, Chi JT, Dudoit S, et al. Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts. Pros Nat Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12877-82. DOI:10.1073/pnas.162488599
19. Fligiel SEG, Varani J, Datta SC, at al. Collagen degradation in aged/photodamaged skin in vivo and after exposure to matrix metalloproteinase-1 in vitro. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120(5):842-8. DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12148.x
20. Xue M, Jackson CJ. Extracellular Matrix Reorganization During Wound Healing and Its Impact on Abnormal Scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(3):119-36. DOI:10.1089/wound.2013.0485
21. Bucala R, Spiegel LA, Chesney J, at al. Circulating fibrocytes define a new leukocyte subpopulation that mediates tissue repair. Mol Med. 1994;1(1):71-81.
22. Chang Y, Li H, Guo Z. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Like Properties in Fibroblasts. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;34(3):703-14. DOI:10.1159/000363035
23. Woodley DT. Distinct fibroblasts in the papillary and reticular dermis: Implications for wound healing. Dermatol Clin. 2017;35(1):95-100. DOI:10.1016/j.det.2016.07.004
24. Gauthier V, Kyriazi M, Nefla M, et al. Fibroblast heterogeneity: Keystone oftissue homeostasis and pathology ininflammation and ageing. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1137659. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1137659
25. Rognoni Е, Pisco АО, Hiratsuka Т, et al. Fibroblast state switching orhestrates dermal maturation and wound healing. Mol Syst Biol. 2018;14(8):8174. DOI:10.15252/msb.20178174
26. Zorina A, Zorin V, Isaev A, et al. Dermal Fibroblasts as the Main Target for Skin Anti-Age Correction Using a Combination of Regenerative Medicine Methods. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023,45:3829-47. DOI:10.3390/cimb45050247
27. Parsonage G, Filer AD, Haworth O, et al. A stromal address code defined by fibroblasts. Trends Immunol. 2005;26(3):150-6. DOI:10.1016/j.it.2004.11.014
28. Toma J, Akhavan M, Fernandes K, et al. Isolation of multipotent adult stem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:778-84. DOI:10.1038/ncb0901-778
29. Клишов А.А. Гистогенез и регенерация тканей. Л.: Медицина, 1984 [Klishov AA. Gistogenez i regeneratsiia tkanei. Leningrad: Meditsina, 1984 (in Russian)].
30. Данилов Р.К. Гистология, эмбриология, цитология. Атлас-справочник: учебное пособие. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2021 [Danilov RK. Gistologiia, embriologiia, tsitologiia. Atlas-spravochnik: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2021 (in Russian)].
31. Zorina A, Zorin V, Isaev A, et al. Age-Related Changes in the Fibroblastic Differon of the Dermis: Role in Skin Aging. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11):6135. DOI:10.3390/ijms23116135
32. Зорина А.И., Зорин В.Л., Черкасов В.Р. Старение кожи и SPRS-терапия. Медицинская косметология. Косметика & медицина. 2011;(4):60-8 [Zorina AI, Zorin VL, Cherkasov VR. Starenie kozhi i SPRS-terapiia. Meditsinskaia kosmetologiia. Kosmetika & meditsina. 2011;(4):60-8 (in Russian)]. 
33. Zhong J, Hua N, Xiong X, et al. A novel promising therapy for skin aging: Dermal multipotent stem cells against photoaged skin by activation of TGF-b/Smad and p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Med Hypotheses. 2011;76(3):343-6. DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2010.10.035
34. Nolte SV, Xu W, Rennekampff HO. Diversity of fibroblasts – a review on implications for skin tissue engineering cells tissues organs. Cells Tissues Organs. 2008;187:165-76. DOI:10.1159/000111805
35. Зорина А.И., Бозо И.Я., Зорин В.Л., и др. Фибробласты дермы: особенности цитогенеза, цитофизиологии и возможности клинического применения. Клеточная трансплантология и тканевая инженерия. 2011;6(2):16-26 [Zorina AI, Bozo IIa, Zorin VL, et al. Fibroblasty dermy: osobennosti tsitogeneza, tsitofiziologii i vozmozhnosti klinicheskogo primeneniia. Kletochnaia transplantologiia i tkanevaia inzheneriia. 2011;6(2):16-26 (in Russian)].
36. Хертель Б. Молекулярные и клеточные механизмы естественного старения и фотостарения (стрессорные факторы, защитный механизм). Косметика и медицина. 2000;4:5-17 [Khertel’ B. Molekuliarnye i kletochnye mekhanizmy estestvennogo stareniia i fotostareniia (stressornye faktory, zashchitnyi mekhanizm). Kosmetika i meditsina. 2000;4:5-17 (in Russian)].
37. Salzer MC, Lafzi A, Berenguer-Llergo A, et al. Identity Noise and Adipogenic Traits – Characterize Dermal Fibroblast Aging. Cell. 2018;175:1575-90. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.012 
38. Петрович Ю.А., Яремя И.В., Киченко С.М., Гурин А.Н. Значение клеток крови фиброцитов при травме, развитии рубца и келоида. Патологическая физиология и экспериментальная терапия. 2008;4:31-3 [Petrovich IuA, Iaremia IV, Kichenko SM, Gurin AN. Znachenie kletok krovi fibrotsitov pri travme, razvitii rubtsa i keloida. Patologicheskaia fiziologiia i eksperimental’naia terapiia. 2008;4:31-3 (in Russian)].
39. Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majne G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia. 1971;27:549-50. DOI:10.1007/BF02147594
40. Desmouliere A, Darby IA, Gabbiani G. Normal and pathologic soft tissue remodeling: role of the myofibroblast, with special emphasis on liver and kidney fibrosis. Lab Invest. 2003;83:1689-707. DOI:10.1097/01.lab.0000101911.53973.90
41. Darby IA, Laverdet B, Bonte F, Desmouliere A. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in wound healing. Clin Cosmet Investigat Dermatol. 2014;7:301-11. DOI:10.2147/CCID.S50046
42. Kuppe C, Ibrahim MM, Kranz J, at al. Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis. Nature. 2021;589:281-6. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2941-1
43. Guerrero-Juarez CF, Astrowski AA, Murad R, et al. Wound Regeneration Deficit in Rats Correlates with Low Morphogenetic Potential and Distinct Transcriptome Profile of Epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(6):1409-19. DOI:10.1016/j.jid.2017.12.030
44. Горбулич А.В. Сравнительная характеристика репаративного гистогенеза кожи при различных повреждающих факторах. Инновационные технологии изучения гистогенеза, реактивности и регенерации тканей. Труды Военно-медицинской академии. 2024;263:111-5 [Gorbulich AV. Sravnitel’naia kharakteristika reparativnogo gistogeneza kozhi pri razlichnykh povrezhdaiushchikh faktorakh. Innovatsionnye tekhnologii izucheniia gistogeneza, reaktivnosti i regeneratsii tkanei. Trudy Voenno-meditsinskoi akademii. 2024;263:111-5 (in Russian)].
45. Bos J. Skin immune system: Cutaneous immunology and clinical immunodermatology. 2nd ed. CRC Press. 2004.
46. Bird JA, Sánchez-Borges M, Ansotegui IJ, et al. Skin as an immune organ and clinical applications of skin-based immunotherapy. World Allergy Organ J. 2018;11(1):38. DOI:10.1186/s40413-018-0215-2
47. Chambers ES, Vukmanovic-Stejic М. Skin barrier immunity and ageing. Immunology. 2020;160(2):116-25. DOI:10.1111/imm.13152
48. Зорина А., Зорин В., Черкасов В. Дермальные фибробласты: разнообразие фенотипов и физиологических функций, роль в старении кожи. Эстетическая медицина.
2012;(1):15-31 [Zorina A, Zorin V, Cherkasov V. Dermal’nye fibroblasty: raznoobrazie fenotipov i fiziologicheskikh funktsii, rol’ v starenii kozhi. Esteticheskaia meditsina. 2012;(1):15-31 (in Russian)].
49. Mok KW, Saxena N, Heitman N, at al. Dermal Condensate Niche Fate Specification Occurs Prior to Formation and Is Placode Progenitor Dependent. Dev Cell. 2019;48(1):32-48. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.034
50. Shin W, Rosin NL, Sparks H, at al. Dysfunction of Hair Follicle Mesenchymal Progenitors Contributes to Age-Associated Hair Loss. Dev Cell. 2020;53(2):185-98. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.03.019
51. Van Haasterecht L, Dsouza C, Ma Y, et al. In vitro responses of human dermal fibroblasts to mechanical strain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Mech Eng. 2023;9. DOI:10.3389/fmech.2023.1049659
52. Sennett R, Rendl M. Mesenchymal–epithelial interactions during hair follicle morphogenesis and cycling. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012;23(8):917-27. DOI:10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.08.011
53. Paus R, Ito N, Takigawa M, Ito T. The Hair Follicle and Immune Privilege. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2003;8(2):188-94. DOI:10.1046/j.1087-0024.2003.00807.x
54. Zwick RK, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Horsley V, Plikus MV. Anatomical, Physiological, and Functional Diversity of Adipose Tissue. Cell Metab. 2018;27(1):68-83. DOI:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.12.002
55. Zhang L-J, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Hata T, at al. Dermal adipocytes protect against invasive Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. Science. 2015;347(6217):67-71. DOI:10.1126/science.1260972
56. Zhang Z, Kruglikov I, Zhao S, at al. Dermal adipocytes contribute to the metabolic regulation of dermal fibroblasts. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30(1):102-11. DOI:10.1111/exd.14181
57. Hayflick L, Moorhead PS. The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. 1961;25(3):585-621. DOI:10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6
58. He S, Wang LH, Liu Y, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of an adult human cell atlas of 15 major organs. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):294. DOI:10.1186/s13059-020-02210-0
59. Sharpless NE, DePinho RA. How stem cells age and why this makes us grow old. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;703-13. DOI:10.1038/nrm2241
60. Fisher GJ, Varani J, Voorhees JJ. Looking older: Fibroblast Collapse and Therapeutic Implications. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(5):666-72. DOI:10.1001/archderm.144.5.666
61. Rolin G, Binda D, Tissot M, et al. In vitro study of the impact of mechanical tension on the dermal fibroblast phenotype in the context of skin wound healing. J Biomech. 2014;47(14):3555-61. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.07.015
62. Varani J, Schuger L, Dame M, et al. Reduced fibroblast interaction with intact collagen as a mechanism for depressed collagen synthesis in photodamaged skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:1471-9. DOI:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22614.x
63. Varani J, Dame M, Rittie L, et al. Decreased collagen production in chronologically aged skin. Roles of age-dependent alteration in fibroblast function and defective mechanical stimulation. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(6):1861-8. DOI:10.2353/ajpath.2006.051302
64. Aguilera SB, McCarthy A, Khalifian S, et al. The Role of Calcium Hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) as a Regenerative Aesthetic Treatment: A Narrative Review. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43(10):1063-90. DOI:10.1093/asj/sjad173
65. Зорин В.Л., Зорина А.И., Копнин П.Б., и др. Качественная и количественная оценка состояния кожи лица после применения аутологичных дермальных фибробластов. Вестник эстетической медицины. 2011;10(2):16-26 [Zorin VL, Zorina AI, Kopnin PB, et al. Kachestvennaia i kolichestvennaia otsenka sostoianiia kozhi litsa posle primeneniia autologichnykh dermal’nykh fibroblastov. Vestnik esteticheskoi meditsiny. 2011;10(2):16-26 (in Russian)].
66. Зорина А.И., Зорин В.Л. Регенераторный потенциал кожи. Определение и применение в косметологической практике. Облик Esthetic Guide. 2015;4:46-9 [Zorina AI, Zorin VL. Regeneratornyi potentsial kozhi. Opredelenie i primenenie v kosmetologicheskoi praktike. Oblik Esthetic Guide. 2015;4:46-9 (in Russian)].
67. Nowag B, Casabona G, Kippenberger S, at al. Calcium hydroxylapatite microspheres activate fibroblasts through direct contact to stimulate neocollagenesis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(2):426-32. DOI:10.1111/jocd.15521 
68. Nowag B, Schäfer D, Hengl T, et al. Biostimulating fillers and induction of inflammatory pathways: A preclinical investigation of macrophage response to calcium hydroxylapatite and poly-L lactic acid. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;23(1):99-10618. DOI:10.1111/jocd.15928
69. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86-100. DOI:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004
70. Неробеев А.И., Аликова А.В., Близнюков О.П., и др. Экспериментальное обоснование применения радиочастотных токов (RF) в коррекции инволюционных изменений мягких тканей лица и шеи. Российский стоматологический журнал. 2012;2:12-6 [Nerobeev AI, Alikova AV, Blizniukov OP, et al. Eksperimental’noe obosnovanie primeneniia radiochastotnykh tokov (RF) v korrektsii involiutsionnykh izmenenii miagkikh tkanei litsa i shei. Rossiiskii stomatologicheskii zhurnal. 2012;2:12-6 (in Russian)].
71. Spandau DF, LewisAlly-Khan DA, Ally-Khan S, et al. Fractionated Laser Resurfacing Corrects the Inappropriate UVB Response in Geriatric Skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(6):1591-6. DOI:10.1038/jid.2012.29
72. Nakano S. Histological investigation of picosecond laser-toning and fractional laser therapy. J-STAGE. Laser Ther. 2020;29(1):53-60. DOI:10.5978/islsm.20-OR-05
73. Kirsanova LV, Araviyskaya ER, Rybakova MG, et al. Histological characterization of age-related skin changes following the use of picosecond laser: low versus high energy. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(4):e13635. DOI:10.1111/dth.13635
74. Borges J, Araújo L, Cuzzi T, et al. Fractional Laser Resurfacing Treats Photoaging by Promoting Neocollegenesis and Cutaneous Edema. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020;13(1):22-7.
75. Contini M, Hollander Marijke HJ, Vissink A, et al. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound for Facial Skin Tightening. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1522. DOI:10.3390/ijerph20021522
76. Gutowski KA. Microfocused Ultrasound for Skin Tightening. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43(3):577-82. DOI:10.1016/j.cps.2016.03.012
77. Wang F, Garza LA, Kang S, et al. In Vivo Stimulation of De Novo Collagen Production Caused by Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Injections in Photodamaged Human Skin. Arch Dermatol. 2007:143(2). DOI:10.1001/archderm.143.2.155
78. Schierle CF, Casas LA. Nonsurgical rejuvenation of the aging face with injectable poly-L-lactic acid for restoration of soft tissue volume. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31(1):95-109. DOI:10.1177/1090820X10391213
79. Bartus C, Hanke WC, Daro-Kaftan E. A Decade of Experience with Injectable Poly-L-Lactic Acid: A Focus on Safety. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(5):698-705. DOI:10.1111/dsu.12128
80. Wang H, Guo B, Hui Q, et al. CO2 lattice laser reverses skin aging caused by UVB. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(8):7056-65. DOI:10.18632/aging.103063 
81. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective phototermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;22:524-7. DOI:10.1126/science.6836297
82. Habbema L, Rieko Verhagen R, Hal RV, et al. Efficacy of minimally invasive non-thermal laser-induced optical breakdown technology for skin rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(3):935-40. DOI:10.1007/s10103-012-1179-z
83. Tanghetti EA. The histology of skin treated with a picosecond alexandrite laser and a fractional lens array. Lasers Surg Med. 2016;48(7):646-52. DOI:10.1002/lsm.22540
84. Zhong J, Hua N, Xiong X, et al. A novel promising therapy for skin aging: Dermal multipotent stem cells against photoaged skin by activation of TGF-b/Smad and p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Med Hypotheses. 2011;76(3):343-6. DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2010.10.035
85. Фриденштейн А.Я., Чайлахджан Р.К., Лалыкина К.С. Развитие колоний фибробластов в монослойных культурах клеток костного мозга и селезенки морских свинок. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970;3(4):393-403 [Fridenshtein AIa, Chailakhdzhan RK, Lalykina KS. Razvitie kolonii fibroblastov v monosloinykh kul’turakh kletok kostnogo mozga i selezenki morskikh svinok. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970;3(4):393-403 (in Russian)].

________________________________________________

1. Shtyrkova EV. Fibroblasty dermy. Istochniki differentsirovki, Proliferativnaia aktivnost’ i metody ee stimuliatsii. Vestnik meditsinskogo instituta «REAVIZ». 2017;(6):43-50 (in Russian). 
2. Humphrey S, Brown SM, Cross SJ, Mehta R. Defining Skin Quality: Clinical Relevance, Terminology, and Assessment. Dermatol Surg. 2021;47(7):974-81. DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003079
3. Silina EV, Manturova NE, Morgulis NV, Stupin VA. Physiology of skin aging. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2020;2:40-5 (in Russian). DOI:10.17116/plast.hirurgia202002140
4. Araviiskaia ER. Izmeneniia v perimenopauze: printsipy sovremennoi kompleksnoi korrektsii. Klin derm i ven. 2007;(2):97-100 (in Russian).
5. Araviiskaia ER. Vozrastnye izmeneniia v derme: novye svedeniia i puti korrektsii s pomoshch’iu sredstv ezhednevnogo ukhoda. Russkii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2008;16(8):574-5 (in Russian).
6. Al’berts B, Dzhonson A, L’iuis Dzh, et al. Fibroblasty i ikh transformatsii: semeistvo kletok soedinitel’noi tkani. Molekuliarnaia biologiia kletki. 4-e izd. N’iu-Iork: Garland Nauka, 2002 (in Russian).
7. Rukovodstvo po gistologii (v dvukh tomakh). Pod red. RK Danilova. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Saint Petersburg: SpetsLit, 2011 (in Russian).
8. Dick MK, Miao JH, Limaiem F. Histology, Fibroblast. StatPearls [Internet]. 2023.
9. Afanas›ev IuI, Iurina NA, Kotovskii EF, et al. Gistologiia, embriologiia, tsitologiia. Uchebnik. Pod red. Iu.I. Afanas’eva, N.A. Iurinoi. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2020 (in Russian).
10. Plikus MV, Wang X, Sinha S, at al. Fibroblasts: origins, definitions, and functions in health and disease. Cell. 2021;184(15):3852-82. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.024
11. Bozo IIa, Deev RV, Pinaev GP. «Fibroblast» – spetsializirovannaia kletka ili funktsional’noe sostoianie kletok mezenkhimnogo proiskhozhdeniia. Tsitologiia. 2010;52(2):99-109 (in Russian).
12. Kendall RT, Feghali-Bostwick CA. Fibroblasts in fibrosis: novel roles and mediators. Front Pharmacol. 2014;(5):123. DOI:10.3389/fphar.2014.00123
13. Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nate Rev Cancer. 2016;(16):582-98. DOI:10.1038/nrc.2016.73
14. Borzykh OB, Shnaider NA, Karpova EI, et al. Sintez kollagena v kozhe, ego funktsional’nye i strukturnye osobennosti. Meditsinskii vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza. 2021;16(4):443-50 (in Russian).
15. Zhu W, Dong C. Poly-L-Lactic acid increases collagen gene expression and synthesis in cultured dermal fibroblast (Hs68) through the TGF-β/Smad pathway. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(4):1213-9. DOI:10.1111/jocd.15571 
16. Stein P, Vitavska O, Kind P, et al. The biological basis for poly-l-lactic acid-induced augmentation. J Dermatol Sci. 2015;78(1):26-33. DOI:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2015.01.012
17. Omel’ianenko NP, Slutskii LI. Soedinitel’naia tkan’ (gistofiziologiia i biokhimiia). Moscow: Izvestiia, 2009. T. 1 (in Russian).
18. Chang HY, Chi JT, Dudoit S, et al. Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts. Pros Nat Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12877-82. DOI:10.1073/pnas.162488599
19. Fligiel SEG, Varani J, Datta SC, at al. Collagen degradation in aged/photodamaged skin in vivo and after exposure to matrix metalloproteinase-1 in vitro. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120(5):842-8. DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12148.x
20. Xue M, Jackson CJ. Extracellular Matrix Reorganization During Wound Healing and Its Impact on Abnormal Scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(3):119-36. DOI:10.1089/wound.2013.0485
21. Bucala R, Spiegel LA, Chesney J, at al. Circulating fibrocytes define a new leukocyte subpopulation that mediates tissue repair. Mol Med. 1994;1(1):71-81.
22. Chang Y, Li H, Guo Z. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Like Properties in Fibroblasts. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;34(3):703-14. DOI:10.1159/000363035
23. Woodley DT. Distinct fibroblasts in the papillary and reticular dermis: Implications for wound healing. Dermatol Clin. 2017;35(1):95-100. DOI:10.1016/j.det.2016.07.004
24. Gauthier V, Kyriazi M, Nefla M, et al. Fibroblast heterogeneity: Keystone oftissue homeostasis and pathology ininflammation and ageing. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1137659. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1137659
25. Rognoni Е, Pisco АО, Hiratsuka Т, et al. Fibroblast state switching orhestrates dermal maturation and wound healing. Mol Syst Biol. 2018;14(8):8174. DOI:10.15252/msb.20178174
26. Zorina A, Zorin V, Isaev A, et al. Dermal Fibroblasts as the Main Target for Skin Anti-Age Correction Using a Combination of Regenerative Medicine Methods. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023,45:3829-47. DOI:10.3390/cimb45050247
27. Parsonage G, Filer AD, Haworth O, et al. A stromal address code defined by fibroblasts. Trends Immunol. 2005;26(3):150-6. DOI:10.1016/j.it.2004.11.014
28. Toma J, Akhavan M, Fernandes K, et al. Isolation of multipotent adult stem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:778-84. DOI:10.1038/ncb0901-778
29. Klishov AA. Gistogenez i regeneratsiia tkanei. Leningrad: Meditsina, 1984 (in Russian).
30. Danilov RK. Gistologiia, embriologiia, tsitologiia. Atlas-spravochnik: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2021 (in Russian).
31. Zorina A, Zorin V, Isaev A, et al. Age-Related Changes in the Fibroblastic Differon of the Dermis: Role in Skin Aging. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11):6135. DOI:10.3390/ijms23116135
32. Zorina AI, Zorin VL, Cherkasov VR. Starenie kozhi i SPRS-terapiia. Meditsinskaia kosmetologiia. Kosmetika & meditsina. 2011;(4):60-8 (in Russian). 
33. Zhong J, Hua N, Xiong X, et al. A novel promising therapy for skin aging: Dermal multipotent stem cells against photoaged skin by activation of TGF-b/Smad and p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Med Hypotheses. 2011;76(3):343-6. DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2010.10.035
34. Nolte SV, Xu W, Rennekampff HO. Diversity of fibroblasts – a review on implications for skin tissue engineering cells tissues organs. Cells Tissues Organs. 2008;187:165-76. DOI:10.1159/000111805
35. Zorina AI, Bozo IIa, Zorin VL, et al. Fibroblasty dermy: osobennosti tsitogeneza, tsitofiziologii i vozmozhnosti klinicheskogo primeneniia. Kletochnaia transplantologiia i tkanevaia inzheneriia. 2011;6(2):16-26 (in Russian).
36. Khertel’ B. Molekuliarnye i kletochnye mekhanizmy estestvennogo stareniia i fotostareniia (stressornye faktory, zashchitnyi mekhanizm). Kosmetika i meditsina. 2000;4:5-17 (in Russian).
37. Salzer MC, Lafzi A, Berenguer-Llergo A, et al. Identity Noise and Adipogenic Traits – Characterize Dermal Fibroblast Aging. Cell. 2018;175:1575-90. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.012 
38. Petrovich IuA, Iaremia IV, Kichenko SM, Gurin AN. Znachenie kletok krovi fibrotsitov pri travme, razvitii rubtsa i keloida. Patologicheskaia fiziologiia i eksperimental’naia terapiia. 2008;4:31-3 (in Russian).
39. Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majne G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia. 1971;27:549-50. DOI:10.1007/BF02147594
40. Desmouliere A, Darby IA, Gabbiani G. Normal and pathologic soft tissue remodeling: role of the myofibroblast, with special emphasis on liver and kidney fibrosis. Lab Invest. 2003;83:1689-707. DOI:10.1097/01.lab.0000101911.53973.90
41. Darby IA, Laverdet B, Bonte F, Desmouliere A. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in wound healing. Clin Cosmet Investigat Dermatol. 2014;7:301-11. DOI:10.2147/CCID.S50046
42. Kuppe C, Ibrahim MM, Kranz J, at al. Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis. Nature. 2021;589:281-6. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2941-1
43. Guerrero-Juarez CF, Astrowski AA, Murad R, et al. Wound Regeneration Deficit in Rats Correlates with Low Morphogenetic Potential and Distinct Transcriptome Profile of Epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(6):1409-19. DOI:10.1016/j.jid.2017.12.030
44. Gorbulich AV. Sravnitel’naia kharakteristika reparativnogo gistogeneza kozhi pri razlichnykh povrezhdaiushchikh faktorakh. Innovatsionnye tekhnologii izucheniia gistogeneza, reaktivnosti i regeneratsii tkanei. Trudy Voenno-meditsinskoi akademii. 2024;263:111-5 (in Russian).
45. Bos J. Skin immune system: Cutaneous immunology and clinical immunodermatology. 2nd ed. CRC Press. 2004.
46. Bird JA, Sánchez-Borges M, Ansotegui IJ, et al. Skin as an immune organ and clinical applications of skin-based immunotherapy. World Allergy Organ J. 2018;11(1):38. DOI:10.1186/s40413-018-0215-2
47. Chambers ES, Vukmanovic-Stejic М. Skin barrier immunity and ageing. Immunology. 2020;160(2):116-25. DOI:10.1111/imm.13152
48. Zorina A, Zorin V, Cherkasov V. Dermal’nye fibroblasty: raznoobrazie fenotipov i fiziologicheskikh funktsii, rol’ v starenii kozhi. Esteticheskaia meditsina. 2012;(1):15-31 (in Russian).
49. Mok KW, Saxena N, Heitman N, at al. Dermal Condensate Niche Fate Specification Occurs Prior to Formation and Is Placode Progenitor Dependent. Dev Cell. 2019;48(1):32-48. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.034
50. Shin W, Rosin NL, Sparks H, at al. Dysfunction of Hair Follicle Mesenchymal Progenitors Contributes to Age-Associated Hair Loss. Dev Cell. 2020;53(2):185-98. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.03.019
51. Van Haasterecht L, Dsouza C, Ma Y, et al. In vitro responses of human dermal fibroblasts to mechanical strain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Mech Eng. 2023;9. DOI:10.3389/fmech.2023.1049659
52. Sennett R, Rendl M. Mesenchymal–epithelial interactions during hair follicle morphogenesis and cycling. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012;23(8):917-27. DOI:10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.08.011
53. Paus R, Ito N, Takigawa M, Ito T. The Hair Follicle and Immune Privilege. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2003;8(2):188-94. DOI:10.1046/j.1087-0024.2003.00807.x
54. Zwick RK, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Horsley V, Plikus MV. Anatomical, Physiological, and Functional Diversity of Adipose Tissue. Cell Metab. 2018;27(1):68-83. DOI:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.12.002
55. Zhang L-J, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Hata T, at al. Dermal adipocytes protect against invasive Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. Science. 2015;347(6217):67-71. DOI:10.1126/science.1260972
56. Zhang Z, Kruglikov I, Zhao S, at al. Dermal adipocytes contribute to the metabolic regulation of dermal fibroblasts. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30(1):102-11. DOI:10.1111/exd.14181
57. Hayflick L, Moorhead PS. The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. 1961;25(3):585-621. DOI:10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6
58. He S, Wang LH, Liu Y, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of an adult human cell atlas of 15 major organs. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):294. DOI:10.1186/s13059-020-02210-0
59. Sharpless NE, DePinho RA. How stem cells age and why this makes us grow old. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;703-13. DOI:10.1038/nrm2241
60. Fisher GJ, Varani J, Voorhees JJ. Looking older: Fibroblast Collapse and Therapeutic Implications. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(5):666-72. DOI:10.1001/archderm.144.5.666
61. Rolin G, Binda D, Tissot M, et al. In vitro study of the impact of mechanical tension on the dermal fibroblast phenotype in the context of skin wound healing. J Biomech. 2014;47(14):3555-61. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.07.015
62. Varani J, Schuger L, Dame M, et al. Reduced fibroblast interaction with intact collagen as a mechanism for depressed collagen synthesis in photodamaged skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:1471-9. DOI:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22614.x
63. Varani J, Dame M, Rittie L, et al. Decreased collagen production in chronologically aged skin. Roles of age-dependent alteration in fibroblast function and defective mechanical stimulation. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(6):1861-8. DOI:10.2353/ajpath.2006.051302
64. Aguilera SB, McCarthy A, Khalifian S, et al. The Role of Calcium Hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) as a Regenerative Aesthetic Treatment: A Narrative Review. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43(10):1063-90. DOI:10.1093/asj/sjad173
65. Zorin VL, Zorina AI, Kopnin PB, et al. Kachestvennaia i kolichestvennaia otsenka sostoianiia kozhi litsa posle primeneniia autologichnykh dermal’nykh fibroblastov. Vestnik esteticheskoi meditsiny. 2011;10(2):16-26 (in Russian).
66. Zorina AI, Zorin VL. Regeneratornyi potentsial kozhi. Opredelenie i primenenie v kosmetologicheskoi praktike. Oblik Esthetic Guide. 2015;4:46-9 (in Russian).
67. Nowag B, Casabona G, Kippenberger S, at al. Calcium hydroxylapatite microspheres activate fibroblasts through direct contact to stimulate neocollagenesis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(2):426-32. DOI:10.1111/jocd.15521 
68. Nowag B, Schäfer D, Hengl T, et al. Biostimulating fillers and induction of inflammatory pathways: A preclinical investigation of macrophage response to calcium hydroxylapatite and poly-L lactic acid. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;23(1):99-10618. DOI:10.1111/jocd.15928
69. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86-100. DOI:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004
70. Nerobeev AI, Alikova AV, Blizniukov OP, et al. Eksperimental’noe obosnovanie primeneniia radiochastotnykh tokov (RF) v korrektsii involiutsionnykh izmenenii miagkikh tkanei litsa i shei. Rossiiskii stomatologicheskii zhurnal. 2012;2:12-6 (in Russian).
71. Spandau DF, LewisAlly-Khan DA, Ally-Khan S, et al. Fractionated Laser Resurfacing Corrects the Inappropriate UVB Response in Geriatric Skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(6):1591-6. DOI:10.1038/jid.2012.29
72. Nakano S. Histological investigation of picosecond laser-toning and fractional laser therapy. J-STAGE. Laser Ther. 2020;29(1):53-60. DOI:10.5978/islsm.20-OR-05
73. Kirsanova LV, Araviyskaya ER, Rybakova MG, et al. Histological characterization of age-related skin changes following the use of picosecond laser: low versus high energy. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(4):e13635. DOI:10.1111/dth.13635
74. Borges J, Araújo L, Cuzzi T, et al. Fractional Laser Resurfacing Treats Photoaging by Promoting Neocollegenesis and Cutaneous Edema. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020;13(1):22-7.
75. Contini M, Hollander Marijke HJ, Vissink A, et al. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound for Facial Skin Tightening. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1522. DOI:10.3390/ijerph20021522
76. Gutowski KA. Microfocused Ultrasound for Skin Tightening. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43(3):577-82. DOI:10.1016/j.cps.2016.03.012
77. Wang F, Garza LA, Kang S, et al. In Vivo Stimulation of De Novo Collagen Production Caused by Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Injections in Photodamaged Human Skin. Arch Dermatol. 2007:143(2). DOI:10.1001/archderm.143.2.155
78. Schierle CF, Casas LA. Nonsurgical rejuvenation of the aging face with injectable poly-L-lactic acid for restoration of soft tissue volume. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31(1):95-109. DOI:10.1177/1090820X10391213
79. Bartus C, Hanke WC, Daro-Kaftan E. A Decade of Experience with Injectable Poly-L-Lactic Acid: A Focus on Safety. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(5):698-705. DOI:10.1111/dsu.12128
80. Wang H, Guo B, Hui Q, et al. CO2 lattice laser reverses skin aging caused by UVB. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(8):7056-65. DOI:10.18632/aging.103063 
81. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective phototermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;22:524-7. DOI:10.1126/science.6836297
82. Habbema L, Rieko Verhagen R, Hal RV, et al. Efficacy of minimally invasive non-thermal laser-induced optical breakdown technology for skin rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(3):935-40. DOI:10.1007/s10103-012-1179-z
83. Tanghetti EA. The histology of skin treated with a picosecond alexandrite laser and a fractional lens array. Lasers Surg Med. 2016;48(7):646-52. DOI:10.1002/lsm.22540
84. Zhong J, Hua N, Xiong X, et al. A novel promising therapy for skin aging: Dermal multipotent stem cells against photoaged skin by activation of TGF-b/Smad and p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Med Hypotheses. 2011;76(3):343-6. DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2010.10.035
85. Fridenshtein AIa, Chailakhdzhan RK, Lalykina KS. Razvitie kolonii fibroblastov v monosloinykh kul’turakh kletok kostnogo mozga i selezenki morskikh svinok. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970;3(4):393-403 (in Russian).

Л.В. Кирсанова*^1,2, Е.Р. Аравийская^1,2, М.Г. Рыбакова¹, Е.В. Соколовский¹, А.И. Богатенков<sup>2

1</sup>ФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П. Павлова» Минздрава России, Санкт-Петербург, Россия;
²Институт красоты «Галактика», Санкт-Петербург, Россия
*lvkirsanova@yandex.ru

________________________________________________

Lesia V. Kirsanova*^1,2, Elena R. Araviiskaia^1,2, Margarita G. Rybakova¹, Evgeny V. Sokolovskiy¹, Alexey I. Bogatenkov<sup>2

1</sup>Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia;
²Medical Clinic Galaxy, Saint Petersburg, Russia
*lvkirsanova@yandex.ru