Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения. Авторизуйтесь или зарегистрируйтесь.
Актуальное консервативное лечение миомы матки. Улипристала ацетат и повреждение печени: надуманная трагедия?
________________________________________________
Tikhomirov A.L. Current conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. Ulipristal acetate and liver damage: contrived tragedy? Gynecology. 2018; 20 (6): 4–7.
DOI: 10.26442/20795696.2018.6.000053
Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения. Авторизуйтесь или зарегистрируйтесь.
Ключевые слова: лейомиома матки, гистерэктомия, регрессионные методы лечения, острая печеночная недостаточность, улипристала ацетат.
________________________________________________
Uterine fibroids are the most common pelvic tumor formation in women and the most common indication for hysterectomy. The effectiveness of long-term intermittent use of ulipristal acetate (UA) in patients with uterine myoma has been proven earlier. In May 2018, the ability of UA to cause a drug-induced liver injury (drug-induced liver injury, DILI) was disproved, and the European Commission approved a positive decision. According to the conclusion Expertise of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee – PRAC) the benefit/risk ratio remains favorable. Published recommendations are aimed at reducing the risk of liver damage. UA remains the 1st line of treatment for most myomas.
Key words: uterine leiomyoma, hysterectomy, regression treatment methods, acute liver failure, ulipristal acetate.
2. Cramer SF, Patel A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 94 (4): 435–8.
3. Stewart EA, Nicholson WK, Bradley L et al. The burden of uterine fibroids for African-American women: results of a national survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013; 22 (10): 807–16.
4. Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate? Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1424–30.
5. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Myomas and reproductive function. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (5 Suppl.): S125–S130.
6. Тихомиров А.Л. Миома, патогенетическое обоснование органосохраняющего лечения. М., 2013. / Tikhomirov A.L. Mioma, patogeneticheskoe obosnovanie organosokhraniaiushchego lecheniia. M., 2013. [in Russian]
7. Тихомиров А.Л., Манухина Е.И., Вученович Ю.Д. и др. Миома матки. Дифференцированный лечебный подход. Учебное пособие для врачей акушеров-гинекологов. М., 2015. / Tikhomirov A.L., Manukhina E.I., Vuchenovich Iu.D. i dr. Mioma matki. Differentsirovannyi lechebnyi podkhod. Uchebnoe posobie dlia vrachei akusherov-ginekologov. M., 2015. [in Russian]
8. Borah BJ, Nicholson WK, Bradley L et al. The impact of uterine leiomyomas: a national survey of affected women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (4): 319.e1–20.
9. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (2 Pt 1): 233–41.
10. Kim JJ, Sefton EC. The role of progesterone signaling in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 358: 223–31.
11. PEARL I Study Group. Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 409–20.
12. PEARL II Study Group. Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F et al. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 421–32.
13. PEARL III and PEARL III Extension Study Group. Donnez J, Vazquez F, Tomaszewski J et al. Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 1565–73.
14. Donnez J, Hudecek R, Donnez O et al. Efficacy and safety of repeated use of ulipristal acetate in uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 519–27.
15. Tsigkou A, Reis FM, Lee MH et al. Increased progesterone receptor expression in uterine leiomyoma: correlation with age, number of leiomyomas, and clinical symptoms. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 170–5.
16. Xu Q, Takekida S, Ohara N et al. Progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 down-regulates proliferative cell nuclear antigen and Bcl-2 protein expression and up-regulates caspase-3 and poly (adenosine 5′-diphosphateribose)polymerase expression in cultured human uterine leiomyoma cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 953–61.
17. Horne FM, Blithe DL. Progesterone receptor modulators and the endometrium: changes and consequences. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13: 567–80.
18. Koji T, Chedid M, Rubin JS et al. Progesterone-dependent expression of keratinocyte growth factor mRNA in stromal cells of the primate endometrium: keratinocyte growth factor as a progestomedin. J Cell Biol 1994; 125: 393–401.
19. Xu Q, Ohara N, Wei C et al. Progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 down-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor, adrenomedullin and their receptors and modulates progesterone receptor content in cultured human uterine leiomyoma cells. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2408–16.
20. Reinsch RC, Murphy AA, Morales AJ, Yen SS. The effects of RU 486 and leuprolide acetate on uterine artery blood flow in the fibroid uterus: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1623–27.
21. Courtoy G, Donnez J, Marbaix E, Dolmans MM. In vivo mechanisms of uterine myoma volume reduction with ulipristal acetate treatment. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 426–34.
22. Chwalisz K, Larsen L, Mattia-Goldberg C et al. A randomized, controlled trial of asoprisnil, a novel selective progesterone receptor modulator, in women with uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1399–412.
23. Chabbert-Buffet N, Pintiaux-Kairis A, Bouchard P. Effects of the progesterone receptor modulator VA2914 in a continuous low-dose on the hypothalamicpituitary-ovarian axis and endometrium in normal women: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 3582–9.
24. Williams AR, Bergeron C, Barlow DH, Ferenczy A. Endometrial morphology after treatment of uterine fibroids with the selective progesterone receptor modulator, ulipristal acetate. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2012; 31: 556–69.
25. Musallam KM, Tamim HM, Richards T et al. Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2011; 378: 1396–407.
26. Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM. With the advent of selective progesterone receptor modulators, what is the place of myoma surgery in current practice? Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 640–8.
27. Islam MS, Protic O, Giannubilo SR et al. Uterine leiomyoma: available medical treatments and new possible therapeutic options. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 921–34.
28. Chen M, Susuki A, Thakkar S et al. The largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans. Drug Discov Today 2016; 21: 648–53.
29. Lammert C, Einarsson S, Saha C et al. Relationship between daily dose of oral medications and idiosyncratic druginduced liver injury: search for signals. Hepatology 2008; 47: 2003–9.
________________________________________________
1. Day Baird D, Dunson DB, Hill MC et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (1): 100–7.
2. Cramer SF, Patel A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 94 (4): 435–8.
3. Stewart EA, Nicholson WK, Bradley L et al. The burden of uterine fibroids for African-American women: results of a national survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013; 22 (10): 807–16.
4. Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate? Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1424–30.
5. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Myomas and reproductive function. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (5 Suppl.): S125–S130.
6. Tikhomirov A.L. Mioma, patogeneticheskoe obosnovanie organosokhraniaiushchego lecheniia. M., 2013. [in Russian]
7. Tikhomirov A.L., Manukhina E.I., Vuchenovich Iu.D. i dr. Mioma matki. Differentsirovannyi lechebnyi podkhod. Uchebnoe posobie dlia vrachei akusherov-ginekologov. M., 2015. [in Russian]
8. Borah BJ, Nicholson WK, Bradley L et al. The impact of uterine leiomyomas: a national survey of affected women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (4): 319.e1–20.
9. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (2 Pt 1): 233–41.
10. Kim JJ, Sefton EC. The role of progesterone signaling in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 358: 223–31.
11. PEARL I Study Group. Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 409–20.
12. PEARL II Study Group. Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F et al. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 421–32.
13. PEARL III and PEARL III Extension Study Group. Donnez J, Vazquez F, Tomaszewski J et al. Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 1565–73.
14. Donnez J, Hudecek R, Donnez O et al. Efficacy and safety of repeated use of ulipristal acetate in uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 519–27.
15. Tsigkou A, Reis FM, Lee MH et al. Increased progesterone receptor expression in uterine leiomyoma: correlation with age, number of leiomyomas, and clinical symptoms. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 170–5.
16. Xu Q, Takekida S, Ohara N et al. Progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 down-regulates proliferative cell nuclear antigen and Bcl-2 protein expression and up-regulates caspase-3 and poly (adenosine 5′-diphosphateribose)polymerase expression in cultured human uterine leiomyoma cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 953–61.
17. Horne FM, Blithe DL. Progesterone receptor modulators and the endometrium: changes and consequences. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13: 567–80.
18. Koji T, Chedid M, Rubin JS et al. Progesterone-dependent expression of keratinocyte growth factor mRNA in stromal cells of the primate endometrium: keratinocyte growth factor as a progestomedin. J Cell Biol 1994; 125: 393–401.
19. Xu Q, Ohara N, Wei C et al. Progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 down-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor, adrenomedullin and their receptors and modulates progesterone receptor content in cultured human uterine leiomyoma cells. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2408–16.
20. Reinsch RC, Murphy AA, Morales AJ, Yen SS. The effects of RU 486 and leuprolide acetate on uterine artery blood flow in the fibroid uterus: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1623–27.
21. Courtoy G, Donnez J, Marbaix E, Dolmans MM. In vivo mechanisms of uterine myoma volume reduction with ulipristal acetate treatment. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 426–34.
22. Chwalisz K, Larsen L, Mattia-Goldberg C et al. A randomized, controlled trial of asoprisnil, a novel selective progesterone receptor modulator, in women with uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1399–412.
23. Chabbert-Buffet N, Pintiaux-Kairis A, Bouchard P. Effects of the progesterone receptor modulator VA2914 in a continuous low-dose on the hypothalamicpituitary-ovarian axis and endometrium in normal women: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 3582–9.
24. Williams AR, Bergeron C, Barlow DH, Ferenczy A. Endometrial morphology after treatment of uterine fibroids with the selective progesterone receptor modulator, ulipristal acetate. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2012; 31: 556–69.
25. Musallam KM, Tamim HM, Richards T et al. Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2011; 378: 1396–407.
26. Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM. With the advent of selective progesterone receptor modulators, what is the place of myoma surgery in current practice? Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 640–8.
27. Islam MS, Protic O, Giannubilo SR et al. Uterine leiomyoma: available medical treatments and new possible therapeutic options. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 921–34.
28. Chen M, Susuki A, Thakkar S et al. The largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans. Drug Discov Today 2016; 21: 648–53.
29. Lammert C, Einarsson S, Saha C et al. Relationship between daily dose of oral medications and idiosyncratic druginduced liver injury: search for signals. Hepatology 2008; 47: 2003–9.
ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет им. А.И.Евдокимова» Минздрава России. 127473, Россия, Москва, ул. Делегатская, д. 20, стр. 1
pacificoff@mail.ru
________________________________________________
A.L.Tikhomirov
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
pacificoff@mail.ru