Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения. Авторизуйтесь или зарегистрируйтесь.
Пиовар при беременности. Клинический случай
© ООО «КОНСИЛИУМ МЕДИКУМ», 2023 г.
________________________________________________
Andreeva MV, Shevtsova EP, Gatsenko VI, Dvuzhilov VV. Pyo-ovarium during pregnancy. Case report. Gynecology. 2023;25(4):424–427. DOI: 10.26442/20795696.2023.4.202517
Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения. Авторизуйтесь или зарегистрируйтесь.
Ключевые слова: пиовар, беременность, диагностика, тактика ведения
________________________________________________
The issue of postpartum inflammatory diseases of the uterus and appendages remains relevant for modern obstetrics due to their high percentage (5–26%) in the structure of morbidity and mortality among postpartum women. A rare clinical case of purulent oophoritis that occurred in a woman at the end of pregnancy and was detected on day 22 after childbirth, which was due to diagnostic difficulties, is presented, and the management approach in this clinical situation is shown.
Keywords: pyo-ovarium, pregnancy, diagnosis, management approach
2. Bonet M, Souza JP, Abalos E, et al. The global maternal sepsis study and awareness campaign (GLOSS): Study protocol. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):16.
DOI:10.1186/s12978-017-0437-8
3. Адамян Л.В., Артымук Н.В., Белокриницкая Т.Е., и др. Септические осложнения в акушерстве. Клинические рекомендации (протокол лечения). М., 2017 [Adamian LV, Artymuk NV, Belokrinitskaia TE, et al. Septicheskie oslozhneniia v akusherstve. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii (protokol lecheniia). Moscow, 2017 (in Russian)].
4. Материнская смертность в Российской Федерации в 2018 году. Методическое письмо. М., 2018 [Materinskaia smertnost' v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2018 godu. Metodicheskoe pis'mo. Moscow, 2018 (in Russian)].
5. Turner MJ. Maternal sepsis is an evolving challenge. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(1):39-42. DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12833
6. World Health Organization, 2011. Evaluating the quality of care for severe pregnancy complications The WHO near-miss approach for maternal health. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44692/9789241502221_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed: 15.03.2020.
7. Witteveen T, Bezstarosti H, de Koning I, et al. Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: Comparing high- and low-resource settings. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):194. DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1370-0
8. Einav S, Leone M. Epidemiology of obstetric critical illness. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;40:128-39. DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.010
9. Mu Y, Wang X, Li X, et al. The national maternal near miss surveillance in China: A facility-based surveillance system covered 30 provinces. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(44):e17679. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000017679
10. de Lima THB, Amorim MM, Buainain Kassar S, Katz L. Maternal near miss determinants at a maternity hospital for high-risk pregnancy in northeastern Brazil: A prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):271. DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2381-9
11. Аудит критических акушерских состояний в Российской Федерации в 2016 году. Методическое письмо Минздрава России. М., 2017 [Audit kriticheskikh akusherskikh sostoianii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2016 godu. Metodicheskoe pis'mo Minzdrava Rossii. Moscow, 2017 (in Russian)].
12. Россия в цифрах. 2019. Краткий статистический сборник. M.: Росстат, 2019 [Rossiia v tsifrakh. 2019. Kratkii statisticheskii sbornik. Moscow: Rosstat, 2019 (in Russian)].
13. Куценко И.И., Боровиков И.О., Галустян М.В., и др. Возможности прогнозирования гнойно-воспалительных осложнений после операции кесарева сечения. Медицинский вестник Юга России. 2022;13(4):73-87 [Kutsenko II, Borovikov IO, Galustyan MV, et al. Possibilities of predicting purulent-inflammatory complications after cesarean section. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2022;13(4):73-87 (in Russian)]. DOI:10.21886/2219-8075-2022-13-4-73-87
14. Оленев А.С., Коноплянников А.Г., Вученович Ю.Д., и др. Септические осложнения в акушерстве: Точка невозврата. Оценка и прогноз. Доктор.Ру. 2020;19(6):7-14 [Olenev AS, Konoplyannikov AG, Vuchenovich YuD, et al. Septic complications in obstetrics: The point of no return. Evaluation and Prognosis. Doctor.Ru. 2020;19(6):7-14 (in Russian)]. DOI:10.31550/1727-2378-2020-19-6-7-14
15. Axelsson D, Brynhildsen J, Blomberg M. Postpartum infection in relation to maternal characteristics, obstetric interventions and complications. J Perinat Med. 2018;46(3):271-8. DOI:10.1515/jpm-2016-0389
16. Sweet RL. Treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:561909. DOI:10.1155/2011/561909
17. Бицадзе В., Макацария А., Стрижаков А., и др. Жизнеугрожающие состояния в акушерстве и перинатологии. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство, 2019 [Bitsadze V, Makatsariia A, Strizhakov A, et al. Zhizneugrozhaiushchie sostoianiia v akusherstve i perinatologii. Moscow: Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo, 2019 (in Russian)].
18. Краснопольский В.И., Буянова С.Н., Щукина Н.А. Гнойно-септические осложнения в акушерстве и гинекологии: особенности течения на современном этапе. Тактика ведения. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2013;13(4):82-5 [Krasnopol'skii VI, Buianova SN, Shchukina NA. Pyoseptic complications in obstetrics and gynecology: The specific features of their course at the present stage. Management tactics. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2013;13(4):82-5 (in Russian)].
19. Жилинкова Н.Г. Современные представления о пуэрперальных инфекциях в связи с антибактериальной резистентностью и завершением эры антибиотиков. Акушерство и гинекология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2019;7(3):70-5 [Zhilinkova NG. Modern ideas about puerperal infections due to antibacterial resi the stent and the end of the antibiotic era. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie = Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2019;7(3):70-5 (in Russian)].
DOI:10.24411/2303-9698-2019-13010
________________________________________________
1. Radzinskii VE, Fuks AM. Akusherstvo. Uchebnik. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2016 (in Russian).
2. Bonet M, Souza JP, Abalos E, et al. The global maternal sepsis study and awareness campaign (GLOSS): Study protocol. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):16.
DOI:10.1186/s12978-017-0437-8
3. Adamian LV, Artymuk NV, Belokrinitskaia TE, et al. Septicheskie oslozhneniia v akusherstve. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii (protokol lecheniia). Moscow, 2017 (in Russian).
4. Materinskaia smertnost' v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2018 godu. Metodicheskoe pis'mo. Moscow, 2018 (in Russian).
5. Turner MJ. Maternal sepsis is an evolving challenge. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(1):39-42. DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12833
6. World Health Organization, 2011. Evaluating the quality of care for severe pregnancy complications The WHO near-miss approach for maternal health. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44692/9789241502221_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed: 15.03.2020.
7. Witteveen T, Bezstarosti H, de Koning I, et al. Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: Comparing high- and low-resource settings. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):194. DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1370-0
8. Einav S, Leone M. Epidemiology of obstetric critical illness. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;40:128-39. DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.010
9. Mu Y, Wang X, Li X, et al. The national maternal near miss surveillance in China: A facility-based surveillance system covered 30 provinces. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(44):e17679. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000017679
10. de Lima THB, Amorim MM, Buainain Kassar S, Katz L. Maternal near miss determinants at a maternity hospital for high-risk pregnancy in northeastern Brazil: A prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):271. DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2381-9
11. Audit kriticheskikh akusherskikh sostoianii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2016 godu. Metodicheskoe pis'mo Minzdrava Rossii. Moscow, 2017 (in Russian).
12. Rossiia v tsifrakh. 2019. Kratkii statisticheskii sbornik. Moscow: Rosstat, 2019 (in Russian).
13. Kutsenko II, Borovikov IO, Galustyan MV, et al. Possibilities of predicting purulent-inflammatory complications after cesarean section. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2022;13(4):73-87 (in Russian). DOI:10.21886/2219-8075-2022-13-4-73-87
14. Olenev AS, Konoplyannikov AG, Vuchenovich YuD, et al. Septic complications in obstetrics: The point of no return. Evaluation and Prognosis. Doctor.Ru. 2020;19(6):7-14 (in Russian). DOI:10.31550/1727-2378-2020-19-6-7-14
15. Axelsson D, Brynhildsen J, Blomberg M. Postpartum infection in relation to maternal characteristics, obstetric interventions and complications. J Perinat Med. 2018;46(3):271-8. DOI:10.1515/jpm-2016-0389
16. Sweet RL. Treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:561909. DOI:10.1155/2011/561909
17. Bitsadze V, Makatsariia A, Strizhakov A, et al. Zhizneugrozhaiushchie sostoianiia v akusherstve i perinatologii. Moscow: Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo, 2019 (in Russian).
18. Krasnopol'skii VI, Buianova SN, Shchukina NA. Pyoseptic complications in obstetrics and gynecology: The specific features of their course at the present stage. Management tactics. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2013;13(4):82-5 (in Russian).
19. Zhilinkova NG. Modern ideas about puerperal infections due to antibacterial resi the stent and the end of the antibiotic era. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie = Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2019;7(3):70-5 (in Russian). DOI:10.24411/2303-9698-2019-13010
1ФГБОУ ВО «Волгоградский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России, Волгоград, Россия;
2ГУЗ «Городская клиническая больница скорой медицинской помощи №25», Волгоград, Россия;
3ГУЗ «Клинический родильный дом №2», Волгоград, Россия
*vaa1947@yandex.ru
________________________________________________
Margarita V. Andreeva*1, Elena P. Shevtsova1, Vitaly I. Gatsenko2, Vitaly V. Dvuzhilov3
1Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia;
2City Clinical Emergency Hospital №25, Volgograd, Russia;
3Clinical Maternity Hospital №2, Volgograd, Russia
*vaa1947@yandex.ru