Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения.
Чтобы посмотреть материал полностью
Авторизуйтесь
или зарегистрируйтесь.
Современная респираторная терапия у недошенных новорожденных в критическом состоянии
Современная респираторная терапия у недошенных новорожденных в критическом состоянии
Материалы доступны только для специалистов сферы здравоохранения.
Чтобы посмотреть материал полностью
Авторизуйтесь
или зарегистрируйтесь.
Полный текст
Список литературы
1. Антонов А.Г., Байбарина Е.Н., Ионов О.В., Рындин А.Ю. Новый метод респираторной поддержки недоношенных детей. Рос. вестн. перинатологии и педиатрии. 2006; 4: 12–5.
2. Борисевич О.А. Оптимизация терапии респираторных нарушений у недоношенных детей. Дис. ... канд. мед. наук, 2010.
3. Володин Н.Н. Принципы ведения новорожденных с респираторным дистресс синдромом. Методические рекомендации. М., 2009.
4. Володин Н.Н., Сухих Г.Т., Байбарина Е.Н. Первичная и реанимационная помощь новорожденным детям. Методическое письмо. 2010.
5. Froese AB, Kinsella JP. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: Lessons from the neonatal/pediatric experience. Crit Care Med 2005; 33 (3).
6. Aschner JL. Prevention and treatment of BPD: common but questionable therapies. Ipokrates, Neonatal respiratory critical care 2005; p. 7–17.
7. Beatrice M, Stefanescu W, Murphy P et al. Two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants a randomized, controlled trial comparing. Pediatrics 2003; 112; 1031–8.
8. Booth С, Premkumar MH, Yannoulis A et al. Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure during the first week after delivery in extremely preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: 398–402.
9. Carlo WA, Ambalavanan N. Ventilatory strategies in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30 (4): 192–9.
10. Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 643–52.
11. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants – 2010 Update. Neonatology 2010; 97: 402–17.
12. Finer N. To intubate or not – that is the question: continuous positive airway pressure versus surfactant and extremely low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91; 392–4.
13. Halliday HL and for the CURPAP Study Group. Prophylactic or Early Selective Surfactant Combined With nCPAP in Very Preterm Infants. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1402–e9; originally published online May 3, 2010.
14. Fabrizio Sandri, Richard Plavka, Umberto Simeoni on behalf of the CURPAP Advisory Board. The CURPAP Study: An International Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Combining Prophylactic Surfactant and Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Very Preterm Infants. Neonatology 2008; 94: 60–2.
15. Kendig J, Ryan R, Sinkin R et al. Comparison of two strategies for surfactant prophylactics in very premature infants. Multicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics 1998; 101 (6).
16. Morley C. Continuous distending pressure. Arch Dis Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999; 81; 152–6.
17. Northway W, Rosan R, Porter D. Pulmonary disease following respirator therapy of hyaline-membrane disease. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. N Engl J Med 1967; 276: 357.
18. Ancora GS, Lanzoni A, Tagliabue P et al. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28–31
weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89; 394–8.
19. Schulzke SM, Pillow J, Ewald B, Patole SK. Flow-cycled versus time-cycled synchronized ventilation for neonates (Review). Cochrane Collaboration, 2010.
20. Soll RF, Merley CJ. Prophylactic versus selective administration of surfactant. Cocrane Database sys rev-2001.
2. Борисевич О.А. Оптимизация терапии респираторных нарушений у недоношенных детей. Дис. ... канд. мед. наук, 2010.
3. Володин Н.Н. Принципы ведения новорожденных с респираторным дистресс синдромом. Методические рекомендации. М., 2009.
4. Володин Н.Н., Сухих Г.Т., Байбарина Е.Н. Первичная и реанимационная помощь новорожденным детям. Методическое письмо. 2010.
5. Froese AB, Kinsella JP. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: Lessons from the neonatal/pediatric experience. Crit Care Med 2005; 33 (3).
6. Aschner JL. Prevention and treatment of BPD: common but questionable therapies. Ipokrates, Neonatal respiratory critical care 2005; p. 7–17.
7. Beatrice M, Stefanescu W, Murphy P et al. Two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants a randomized, controlled trial comparing. Pediatrics 2003; 112; 1031–8.
8. Booth С, Premkumar MH, Yannoulis A et al. Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure during the first week after delivery in extremely preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: 398–402.
9. Carlo WA, Ambalavanan N. Ventilatory strategies in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30 (4): 192–9.
10. Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 643–52.
11. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants – 2010 Update. Neonatology 2010; 97: 402–17.
12. Finer N. To intubate or not – that is the question: continuous positive airway pressure versus surfactant and extremely low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91; 392–4.
13. Halliday HL and for the CURPAP Study Group. Prophylactic or Early Selective Surfactant Combined With nCPAP in Very Preterm Infants. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1402–e9; originally published online May 3, 2010.
14. Fabrizio Sandri, Richard Plavka, Umberto Simeoni on behalf of the CURPAP Advisory Board. The CURPAP Study: An International Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Combining Prophylactic Surfactant and Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Very Preterm Infants. Neonatology 2008; 94: 60–2.
15. Kendig J, Ryan R, Sinkin R et al. Comparison of two strategies for surfactant prophylactics in very premature infants. Multicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics 1998; 101 (6).
16. Morley C. Continuous distending pressure. Arch Dis Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999; 81; 152–6.
17. Northway W, Rosan R, Porter D. Pulmonary disease following respirator therapy of hyaline-membrane disease. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. N Engl J Med 1967; 276: 357.
18. Ancora GS, Lanzoni A, Tagliabue P et al. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28–31
weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89; 394–8.
19. Schulzke SM, Pillow J, Ewald B, Patole SK. Flow-cycled versus time-cycled synchronized ventilation for neonates (Review). Cochrane Collaboration, 2010.
20. Soll RF, Merley CJ. Prophylactic versus selective administration of surfactant. Cocrane Database sys rev-2001.
Авторы
О.В.Ионов, А.Г.Антонов, О.А.Борисевич, Д.С.Крючко, А.А.Ленюшкина
ФГУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. В.И.Кулакова Минздравсоцразвития РФ
ФГУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. В.И.Кулакова Минздравсоцразвития РФ
Цель портала OmniDoctor – предоставление профессиональной информации врачам, провизорам и фармацевтам.