1. Антонов А.Г., Байбарина Е.Н., Ионов О.В., Рындин А.Ю. Новый метод респираторной поддержки недоношенных детей. Рос. вестн. перинатологии и педиатрии. 2006; 4: 12–5.
2. Борисевич О.А. Оптимизация терапии респираторных нарушений у недоношенных детей. Дис. ... канд. мед. наук, 2010.
3. Володин Н.Н. Принципы ведения новорожденных с респираторным дистресс синдромом. Методические рекомендации. М., 2009.
4. Володин Н.Н., Сухих Г.Т., Байбарина Е.Н. Первичная и реанимационная помощь новорожденным детям. Методическое письмо. 2010.
5. Froese AB, Kinsella JP. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: Lessons from the neonatal/pediatric experience. Crit Care Med 2005; 33 (3).
6. Aschner JL. Prevention and treatment of BPD: common but questionable therapies. Ipokrates, Neonatal respiratory critical care 2005; p. 7–17.
7. Beatrice M, Stefanescu W, Murphy P et al. Two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants a randomized, controlled trial comparing. Pediatrics 2003; 112; 1031–8.
8. Booth С, Premkumar MH, Yannoulis A et al. Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure during the first week after delivery in extremely preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: 398–402.
9. Carlo WA, Ambalavanan N. Ventilatory strategies in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30 (4): 192–9.
10. Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 643–52.
11. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants – 2010 Update. Neonatology 2010; 97: 402–17.
12. Finer N. To intubate or not – that is the question: continuous positive airway pressure versus surfactant and extremely low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91; 392–4.
13. Halliday HL and for the CURPAP Study Group. Prophylactic or Early Selective Surfactant Combined With nCPAP in Very Preterm Infants. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1402–e9; originally published online May 3, 2010.
14. Fabrizio Sandri, Richard Plavka, Umberto Simeoni on behalf of the CURPAP Advisory Board. The CURPAP Study: An International Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Combining Prophylactic Surfactant and Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Very Preterm Infants. Neonatology 2008; 94: 60–2.
15. Kendig J, Ryan R, Sinkin R et al. Comparison of two strategies for surfactant prophylactics in very premature infants. Multicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics 1998; 101 (6).
16. Morley C. Continuous distending pressure. Arch Dis Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999; 81; 152–6.
17. Northway W, Rosan R, Porter D. Pulmonary disease following respirator therapy of hyaline-membrane disease. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. N Engl J Med 1967; 276: 357.
18. Ancora GS, Lanzoni A, Tagliabue P et al. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28–31
weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89; 394–8.
19. Schulzke SM, Pillow J, Ewald B, Patole SK. Flow-cycled versus time-cycled synchronized ventilation for neonates (Review). Cochrane Collaboration, 2010.
20. Soll RF, Merley CJ. Prophylactic versus selective administration of surfactant. Cocrane Database sys rev-2001.