1. Hiraishi S, Agata Y, Saito K et al. Interatrial shunt flow profiles in newborn infants: a colour flow and pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study. Brit Heart J 1991; 65: 41–5.
2. Fukazawa M, Fukushige J, Ueda K. Atrial septal defects in neonates with reference to spontaneous closure. Am Heart J 1988; 116: 123–7.
3. Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59: 17–20.
4. Cruz-González I, Solis J, Inglessis-Azuaje I, Palacios IF. Patent Foramen Ovale: Current state of the art. Rev Esp Cardiol 2008; 61: 738–51.
5. Hara H, Virmani R, Ladich E et al. Patent foramen ovale: Curent pathology, pathophysiology, and clinical status. J Am Coll Card 2005; 46: 1768–76.
6. Franke A, Kuhl HP, Rulands D et al. Quantitative analisis of the morphology of secundum-type atrial septal defect and their dynamic change using transesophageal three-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1997; 96 (II): 323–7.
7. Maeno YV, Benson LN, McLaughlin PR, Boutin C. Dynamic morphology of the secundum atrial septal defect evaluated by three dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart 2000; 83: 673–7.
8. Шарыкин А.С., Шилыковская Е.В., Байн Я.А. Комплексная эхокардиографическая оценка малых межпредсердных сообщений у детей. Ультразвук. и функцион. диагностика. 2008; 1: 85–90.
9. Fuse S, Tomita H, Hatakeyama K et al. Effect of size of a secundum atrial septal defect on shunt volume. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 1447–50.
10. McMahon CJ, Feltes TF, Bricker JT et al. Natural history of growth of secundum atrial septal defects and implications for transcatheter closure. Heart 2002; 87: 256–9.
11. Germonpre P, Hastir F, Dendale P et al. Evidence for increasing patency of foramen ovale in divers. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 912–5.
12. Hanslik A, Pospisil U, Salzer-Muhar U et al. Predictors of spontaneous closure of isolated secundum atrial septal defect in children: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1560–5.
13. Filippi L, Palermo L, Pezzati M et al. Paradoxical embolism in a preterm infant. Developm. Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 713–6.
14. Шарыкин А.С., Шилыковская Е.В., Байн Я.А. Физическое развитие детей с малыми дефектами межпредсердной перегородки. Рос. вестн. перинатологии и педиатрии. 2008; 2: 68–73.
15. Ferguson N, Sansing LH, Herrmann H, Cucchiara B. To close or not to close? PFO, sex and cerebrovascular events. Invasive Cardiol 2006; 18: E292–E293.
16. Shikhar Agarwal, Navkaranbir Singh Bajaj, Dharam J. Kumbhani et al. Meta-analysis of transcatheter closure versus medical therapy for patent foramen ovale in prevention of recurrent neurological events after presumed paradoxical embolism. JACC : Cardiovascular interventions 2012; 5: 777–89.
17. Domitrz I, Mieszkowski J, Kamińska A. Relationship between migraine and patent foramen ovale: a study of 121 patients with migraine headache, 2007; 47(9): 1311–8.
18. Germonpre P, Hastir F, Dendale P et al. Evidence for increasing patency of foramen ovale in divers. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 912–5.
19. Knauth M, Ries S, Pohimann S et al. Cohort study of multiple brain lesions in sport divers: role of a patent foramen ovale. BMJ 1997; 314 doi: http://dx.doi.org /10.1136/bmj.314.7082.701.
Авторы
А.С.Шарыкин
Кафедра госпитальной педиатрии №1 педиатрического факультета ГБОУ ВПО РНИМУ им. Н.И.Пирогова Минздрава РФ, Москва