Актуальные вопросы применения b-адреноблокаторов в клинической практике: все ли они одинаковы?
Актуальные вопросы применения b-адреноблокаторов в клинической практике: все ли они одинаковы?
Небиеридзе Д.В. Актуальные вопросы применения b-адреноблокаторов в клинической практике: все ли они одинаковы? Системные гипертензии. 2016; 13 (3): 21–24.
________________________________________________
Nebieridze D.V. Main questions of b-blockers application in clinical practice: do they all the same? Systemic Hypertension. 2016; 13 (3): 21–24.
Актуальные вопросы применения b-адреноблокаторов в клинической практике: все ли они одинаковы?
Небиеридзе Д.В. Актуальные вопросы применения b-адреноблокаторов в клинической практике: все ли они одинаковы? Системные гипертензии. 2016; 13 (3): 21–24.
________________________________________________
Nebieridze D.V. Main questions of b-blockers application in clinical practice: do they all the same? Systemic Hypertension. 2016; 13 (3): 21–24.
В настоящем обзоре представлен современный взгляд на возможности b-адреноблокаторов (b-АБ) в разных клинических ситуациях. Класс b-АБ представляет неоднородную группу в плане возможностей клинического использования. Ряд b-АБ, особенно неселективных, обладают отрицательными эффектами и в некоторых клинических ситуациях не могут быть использованы (метаболические нарушения, хроническая обструктивная болезнь легких, периферический атеросклероз). Современные суперселективные b-АБ, к числу которых относится Беталок ЗОК, не обладают указанными отрицательными эффектами и могут широко использоваться в клинической практике, в том числе при метаболическом синдроме, сахарном диабете типа 2 и хронической обструктивной болезни легких. Другой проблемой, относящейся к b-АБ, является нечастое их назначение или использование в недостаточных дозах. В связи с этим практикующему врачу необходимо смелее назначать их в рекомендованных терапевтических дозах согласно инструкции по медицинскому применению лекарственного препарата в разных клинических ситуациях.
The present review shows the modern view on b-blockers in different clinical situations. Class b-blockers is a heterogeneous group in terms of clinical use. Several variants of b-blockers, especially non-selective, have negative effects and cannot be used in several clinical situations (metabolic disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral arteriosclerosis). Modern superselective b-blockers, including Betaloc ZOK, does not possess the mentioned adverse effects and can be widely used in clinical practice, even in case of metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Another problem associated with b-blockers is the rare application of the drug and the underdosing of the drug. In this regard, it is very necessary for the practitioner not to be afraid and to start prescribing them in the recommended therapeutic doses according to the instructions for the medical applications for drugs in different clinical situations.
1. Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертензии. Российские рекомендации V пересмотра. Кардиологич. вестн. 2015; 10 (1): 3–30. / Diagnostika i lechenie arterial'noi gipertenzii. Rossiiskie rekomendatsii V peresmotra. Kardiologich. vestn. 2015; 10 (1): 3–30. [in Russian]
2. Диагностика и лечение хронической ишемической болезни сердца. Клинические рекомендации Минздрава России, 2013 г. РКНПК [Электронный ресурс], 10.12.2014. URL: http://www.cardioweb.ru/klinicheskie-rekomendatsii / Diagnostika i lechenie khronicheskoi ishemicheskoi bolezni serdtsa. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava Rossii, 2013 g. RKNPK [Elektronnyi resurs], 10.12.2014. URL: http://www.cardioweb.ru/klinicheskie-rekomendatsii [in Russian]
3. Национальные рекомендации ОССН, РКО и РНМОТ по диагностике и лечению ХСН. Сердечная недостаточность. 2013; 14 (7): 379–472. / Natsional'nye rekomendatsii OSSN, RKO i RNMOT po diagnostike i lecheniiu KhSN. Serdechnaia nedostatochnost'. 2013; 14 (7): 379–472. [in Russian]
4. Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. Part II: Effects of short term-reductions of blood pressure – an overview of the unconfined randomized drug trials in an epidemiological context. Lancet 1990; 335: 827–38.
5. Kaplan M. Metabolic Aspects of Hypertension. London: Science press, 1994.
6. Viskin S, Kitzis I, Lev E et al. Treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents after myocardial infarction: from randomized trials to clinical practice. JACC 1995; 25: 1327–32.
7. Berne C, Pollare T, Lithell H. Effects of antihypertensive treatment on insulin sensitivity with special reference to ACE inhibitors. Diabetes Care 1991, 14 (Suppl. 4): 39–47.
8. Lithell H. Effect of antihypertensive drugs on insulin, glucose, and lipid metabolism. Diabetes Care 1991; 14: 203–9.
9. Reneland R, Alvares E, Andersson PL et al. Induction of insulin resistance by beta-blockade but not by ACE-inhibition: long-term treatment with atenolol or trandolapril. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14: 175–80.
10. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents: Propranolol or HCTZ alone for the initial treatment of hypertension. IV. Effect on plasma glucose and glucose tolerance. Hypertension 1985; 7: 1008–16.
11. The Working Group on Hypertension in diabetes: Statement on hypertension in diabetes mellitus. Final report. Arch Int Med 1987; 147: 830–42.
12. Pool PE, Seagren SC, Salel AF: Metabolic consequences of treating hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1991; 4: 494–502.
13. Weidmann P, Feffier C, Saxenhofer H et al. Serum lipoproteins during treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Drugs 1988; 35 (Suppl. 6): 118–34.
14. Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM et al. A Calcium Antagonist vs a Non-Calcium Antagonist Hypertension Tretment Strategy for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease The International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2003; 290 (21): 2805–16.
15. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97.
16. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomized trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 995–1003.
17. Beevers DG. The end of beta-bockers for uncomplicated hypertension? Lancet 2005; 366: 1510–2.
18. Kronig B. Hertz Kreislauf. J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30: S28–S32. 28. 1990; 22: 224–9.
19. Falkner B, Kushner H. Treatment With Metoprolol Succinate, a Selective Beta Adrenergic Blocker, Lowers Blood Pressure Without Altering Insulin Sensitivity in Diabetic Patients. J Clin Hypertens 2008; 10: 51–7.
20. Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for themanagement of patientswith chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33 (7): 2092–197.
21. Kolloch R, Legler UF, Champion A et al. Impact of resting heart rate on outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: findings from the INternational VErapamil-SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST). Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1327–34.
22. Кобалава Ж.Д., Киякбаев Г.К., Хомицкая Ю.В., Шаваров А.А. Достижение целевого уровня частоты сердечных сокращений покоя у пациентов со стабильной стенокардией и артериальной гипертонией на фоне терапии b-адреноблокаторами в реальной клинической практике. Кардиология. 2013; 7: 1–11. / Kobalava Zh.D., Kiiakbaev G.K., Khomitskaia Iu.V., Shavarov A.A. Dostizhenie tselevogo urovnia chastoty serdechnykh sokrashchenii pokoia u patsientov so stabil'noi stenokardiei i arterial'noi gipertoniei na fone terapii b-adrenoblokatorami v real'noi klinicheskoi praktike. Kardiologiia. 2013; 7: 1–11. [in Russian]
23. Толпыгина С.Н., Марцевич С.Ю. Эффективность и безопасность высоких доз метопролола пролонгированного действия при лечении пациентов со стабильным течением ишемической болезни сердца. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2008; 5: 46–52. / Tolpygina S.N., Martsevich S.Iu. Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' vysokikh doz metoprolola prolongirovannogo deistviia pri lechenii patsientov so stabil'nym techeniem ishemicheskoi bolezni serdtsa. Ratsional'naia farmakoterapiia v kardiologii. 2008; 5: 46–52. [in Russian]
24. The MERIT-HF investigators. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Interven tion Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet 1999; 353: 2001–7.
________________________________________________
1. Diagnostika i lechenie arterial'noi gipertenzii. Rossiiskie rekomendatsii V peresmotra. Kardiologich. vestn. 2015; 10 (1): 3–30. [in Russian]
2. Diagnostika i lechenie khronicheskoi ishemicheskoi bolezni serdtsa. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava Rossii, 2013 g. RKNPK [Elektronnyi resurs], 10.12.2014. URL: http://www.cardioweb.ru/klinicheskie-rekomendatsii [in Russian]
3. Natsional'nye rekomendatsii OSSN, RKO i RNMOT po diagnostike i lecheniiu KhSN. Serdechnaia nedostatochnost'. 2013; 14 (7): 379–472. [in Russian]
4. Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. Part II: Effects of short term-reductions of blood pressure – an overview of the unconfined randomized drug trials in an epidemiological context. Lancet 1990; 335: 827–38.
5. Kaplan M. Metabolic Aspects of Hypertension. London: Science press, 1994.
6. Viskin S, Kitzis I, Lev E et al. Treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents after myocardial infarction: from randomized trials to clinical practice. JACC 1995; 25: 1327–32.
7. Berne C, Pollare T, Lithell H. Effects of antihypertensive treatment on insulin sensitivity with special reference to ACE inhibitors. Diabetes Care 1991, 14 (Suppl. 4): 39–47.
8. Lithell H. Effect of antihypertensive drugs on insulin, glucose, and lipid metabolism. Diabetes Care 1991; 14: 203–9.
9. Reneland R, Alvares E, Andersson PL et al. Induction of insulin resistance by beta-blockade but not by ACE-inhibition: long-term treatment with atenolol or trandolapril. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14: 175–80.
10. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents: Propranolol or HCTZ alone for the initial treatment of hypertension. IV. Effect on plasma glucose and glucose tolerance. Hypertension 1985; 7: 1008–16.
11. The Working Group on Hypertension in diabetes: Statement on hypertension in diabetes mellitus. Final report. Arch Int Med 1987; 147: 830–42.
12. Pool PE, Seagren SC, Salel AF: Metabolic consequences of treating hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1991; 4: 494–502.
13. Weidmann P, Feffier C, Saxenhofer H et al. Serum lipoproteins during treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Drugs 1988; 35 (Suppl. 6): 118–34.
14. Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM et al. A Calcium Antagonist vs a Non-Calcium Antagonist Hypertension Tretment Strategy for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease The International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2003; 290 (21): 2805–16.
15. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97.
16. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomized trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 995–1003.
17. Beevers DG. The end of beta-bockers for uncomplicated hypertension? Lancet 2005; 366: 1510–2.
18. Kronig B. Hertz Kreislauf. J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30: S28–S32. 28. 1990; 22: 224–9.
19. Falkner B, Kushner H. Treatment With Metoprolol Succinate, a Selective Beta Adrenergic Blocker, Lowers Blood Pressure Without Altering Insulin Sensitivity in Diabetic Patients. J Clin Hypertens 2008; 10: 51–7.
20. Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for themanagement of patientswith chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33 (7): 2092–197.
21. Kolloch R, Legler UF, Champion A et al. Impact of resting heart rate on outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: findings from the INternational VErapamil-SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST). Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1327–34.
22. Kobalava Zh.D., Kiiakbaev G.K., Khomitskaia Iu.V., Shavarov A.A. Dostizhenie tselevogo urovnia chastoty serdechnykh sokrashchenii pokoia u patsientov so stabil'noi stenokardiei i arterial'noi gipertoniei na fone terapii b-adrenoblokatorami v real'noi klinicheskoi praktike. Kardiologiia. 2013; 7: 1–11. [in Russian]
23. Tolpygina S.N., Martsevich S.Iu. Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' vysokikh doz metoprolola prolongirovannogo deistviia pri lechenii patsientov so stabil'nym techeniem ishemicheskoi bolezni serdtsa. Ratsional'naia farmakoterapiia v kardiologii. 2008; 5: 46–52. [in Russian]
24. The MERIT-HF investigators. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Interven tion Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet 1999; 353: 2001–7.
Авторы
Д.В.Небиеридзе
ФГБУ Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины Минздрава России. 101990, Россия, Москва, Петроверигский пер., д. 10, стр. 3
*DNeberidze@gnicpm.ru
________________________________________________
D.V.Nebieridze
State Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 101000, Russian Federation, Moscow, Petroverigsky per., d. 10, str. 3
*DNeberidze@gnicpm.ru