Таргетная терапия иматинибом (ИМ) у большинства пациентов с хроническим миелолейкозом (ХМЛ) в хронической фазе (ХФ) приводит к стабильной гематологической и цитогенетической ремиссии. Тем не менее часть больных не достигают полного цитогенетического ответа (ПЦГО) или впоследствии его утрачивают. Кроме того, риск цитогенетического рецидива и прогрессии болезни в фазу акселерации (ФА), или бластный криз (БК) практически приближается к нулю при достижении большого молекулярного ответа (БМО), однако на фоне терапии иматинибом его получают всего около половины пациентов. Еще более редки случаи достижения полного молекулярного ответа (ПМО). Клинические исследования по применению новых ингибиторов тирозинкиназ (ИТК) нилотиниба и дазатиниба в ХФ ХМЛ в качестве 1-й линии терапии доказали их преимущество над ИМ в получении ПЦГО и БМО, а при применении нилотиниба также и по снижению риска трансформации в ФА/БК и увеличению общей выживаемости. В данной обзорной статье в основном приведены результаты двух многоцентровых международных клинических исследований под названиями ENESTnd (The Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials – Newly Diagnosed Patients) и DASISION (The Dasatinib versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naive CML Patients). Хотя прямое сравнение нилотиниба и дазатиниба в рамках разных исследований невозможно, но в статье приведены данные литературы по непрямому сравнительному статистическому анализу эффективности этих препаратов в сопоставимых группах пациентов. Полученные результаты дают основание предполагать, что применение новых ИТК в качестве 1-й линии, в особенности нилотиниба, позволит не только увеличить частоту ПЦГО, молекулярного ответа, беспрогрессивной выживаемости, но и вероятно повысит шанс пациентов на излечение.
Target therapy with imatinib (IM) of chronic phase (CP) of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the majority of patients leads to stable hematologic and cytogenetic remission. Nevertheless some patients don’t achieve complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) or lose it afterwards. Besides after the achievement of major molecular response (MMR) risk of cytogenetic relapse and progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC) tends to zero, but only a half of patients receive it on IM therapy. Achievement of complete molecular response (CMR) is more rare situation. Clinical trials of new tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) nilotinib and dasatinib as a frontline treatment in newly diagnosed CML CP patients proved their advantages above IM in achievement of CCyR and MMR. Nilotinib therapy also decreases risk of progression to AP/BP and increases overall survival. This review contains results of two multicentre international clinical trials ENESTnd (The Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials – Newly Diagnosed Patients) and DASISION (The Dasatinib versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naive CML Patients). Although direct comparison of nilotinib and dasatinib in different trials is impossible, but this review contents description of indirect statistical analysis of nilotinib and dasatinib efficacy in comparable groups of patients. According to this results we can suppose that use of new TKIs as frontline treatment allows not only increase the probability of CCyR, MMR, overall survival, but also increase chances for cure in some patients.
1. Kantarjian H, Cortes J, O’Brien S et al. Long-term survival benefit and improved complete cytogenetic and molecular response rates with imatinib mesylate in Philadelphia chromosome – positive chronic – phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of interferon-alpha. Blood 2004; 104: 1979–88.
2. Зарицкий А.Ю., Ломаиа Е.Г., Виноградова О.Ю. и др. Факторы прогноза при терапии препаратом Иматиниб мезилат у больных в хронической фазе Ph-позитивного хронического миелолейкоза: данные многоцентрового нерандомизированного исследования в России. Терапевт. арх. 2007; 79 (8): 17–22.
3. Calabretta B et al. The biology of CML blast crisis. Blood 2004; 103 (11): 4010–22.
4. Deininger M et al. International randomized study of interferon vs STI571 8 year follow-up: sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with imatinib. Blood 2009; 114; p. 462. Abstr. 1126.
5. Kantarjian HM et al. Optimizing therapy for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer 2010; 116 (6): 1419–30.
6. Bubnoff N, Duyster J. Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. Treatment and Monitoring.
7. Ibrahim AR et al. Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as third line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase who have failed two prior TKI. Blood 2010.
8. O’Hare et al. Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations, drug resistance, and the road to a cure for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2007; 110 (7): 2242–9.
9. Abdulkadyrov K, Lomaia E, Zaritskey A. Survival, cytogenetic, molecular responses in chronic myeloid leukemia chronic phase patients treated by imatinib: 9-year follow-up data from population St.-Petersburg and Leningrad region database. Haematologica 2010; p. 535. Abstr. 1319.
10. Mahon et al. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2008; 112. Abstr. 187.
11. Waller CF. Imatinib mesylate. Recent Results Cancer Res 2010; 184: 3–20.
12. Maren Rohrbacher et al. Epidemiology of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) 2009; 22 (3): 295–302.
13. Hehlmann R. Personal communication 2010.
14. Barnes DJ et al. Primitive, quiescent and difficult to kill: the role of non-proliferating stem cells in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cell Cycle 2006; 5 (24): 2862–6.
15. Geay JF et al. p210BCR-ABL inhibits SDF-1 chemotactic response via alteration of CXCR4 signaling and down-regulation of CXCR4 expression. Cancer Res 2005; 65 (7): 2676–83.
16. Steelman LS et al. JAK/STAT, Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt and BCR-ABL in cell cycle progression and eukemogenesis. Leukemia 2004; 18 (2): 189–218.
17. Mahon et al. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2008; 112. Abstr. 187.
18. Mahon et al. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11 (11): 1029–35.
19. Ciceri F et al. Antitumor effects of HSV-TK-engineered donor lymphocytes after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Blood 2007; 109 (11): 4698–707.
20. Breccia M et al. Reduction of imatinib dose and persistence of complete molecular response after p210 multipeptide vaccine in chronic myeloid leukaemia treated with dose escalation for acquired resistance. Br J Haematol 2010; 150 (2): 240–2.
21. Chervenick PA et al. Patterns of proliferation and differentiation of hematopoetic stem cells after compartment depletion. Blood 1971; 37; p. 568.
22. Kantarjian H et al. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2260–70.
23. Saglio G et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (24): 2251–9.
24. Huges T, Deininger, Hochhaus A et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosin kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood 2006; 108: 28–37.
25. Huges T, Hochhaus A, Kim D et al. ENESTnd update: Continued superiority of Nilotinib vs Imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Blood 116; 19: 94–5. Abstr. 207.
26. Shah N, Kantarjian H, Hochhaus A et al. Dasatinib vs Imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the DASASION trial: 18 month follow-up. Blood 116; 19:
94–5. Abstr. 206.
27. Rosti G et al. Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2009; 114 (24): 4933–8.
28. Cortes JE et al. Nilotinib as front-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (3): 392–7.
29. Cortes JE et al. Results of Dasatinib Therapy in Patients With Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (3): 398–404.
30. Cortes J, Baccarani M, Guilhot F et al. A phase III, randomized, open-label study of 400 mg versus 800 mg of imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, previously untreated chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CMLCP) using molecular endpoints: 1-year results of TOPS (Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor оptimization and Selectivity) study. Blood 2008; 112; p. 335.
31. Hughes T et al. ENESTnd Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib In Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP). ASH 2010. Abstr. 207.
32. Shah et al. Dasatinib Versus Imatinib In Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) In the DASISION Trial: 18-Month Follow-up. ASH 2010. Abstr. 206.
33. Cortes JE et al. Nilotinib as front-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (3): 392–7.
34. Cortes JE et al. Results of Dasatinib Therapy in Patients With Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (3): 398–404.
35. Blake S et al. The Src/ABL kinase inhibitor dasatinib (BMS-354825) inhibits function of normal human T-lymphocytes in vitro. Clin Immunol 2008; 127 (3): 330–9.
36. Kantarjian H et al. Update on imatinib resistant chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase on nilotinib therapy at 24 months: clinical response, safety, and long-term outcomes. Blood 2009; 114 (22). Abstr. 1129.
37. Saglio G et al. Nilotinib demonstrates superior efficacy compared with imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from the international randomized phase III ENESTnd trial. LBA-1. Presented at the 51st ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition 2009; New Orleans, Louisiana.
38. O’Hare T, Walters DK, Stoffregen EP et al. In vitro activity of bcr-abl inhibitors AMN 107 and BMS 354825 against clinically relevant imatinib resistant abl kinase domain mutations. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 4500–5.
39. Signorovitch JE et al. Comparative efficacy of nilotinib and dasatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of randomized trials. Current Medical Research & Opinion 2011; 27 (6): 1263–71.
40. Hantschel O et al. The Btk tyrosinekinase is a major target of the Bcr-Abl inhibitor dasatinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104 (33): 13283–8.
41. Gotoh M et al. Successful prior treatment with dasatinib followed by stem cell transplantation in a patient with CML in blastic crisis with a BCR-ABL mutation. Int J Hematol 2010; 91 (1): 128–31.
1 ФГУ Федеральный центр сердца, крови и эндокринологии им. В.А.Алмазова Минздравсоцразвития РФ
2 ГОУ ВПО Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им. И.П.Павлова