Эффективность и профиль безопасности поддерживающей терапии пеметрекседом при немелкоклеточном раке легкого поздних стадий: обзор исследований III фазы
Эффективность и профиль безопасности поддерживающей терапии пеметрекседом при немелкоклеточном раке легкого поздних стадий: обзор исследований III фазы
Эффективность и профиль безопасности поддерживающей терапии пеметрекседом при немелкоклеточном раке легкого поздних стадий: обзор исследований III фазы
В России в 2009 г. зарегистрировано более 57 тыс. новых случаев злокачественных новообразований трахеи, бронхов и легкого, что составляет 19,8% всех случаев рака у мужчин и 3,9% у женщин. В большинстве случаев эти формы рака выявляются уже на поздней стадии: III стадия у 32,4% пациентов, IV стадия у 36,0% пациентов. Одним из подходов к увеличению продолжительности периода ремиссии или стабилизации заболевания и, как следствие, увеличению выживаемости является назначение поддерживающей терапии у пациентов без прогрессирования заболевания после 1-й линии индукционной химиотерапии. В данном обзоре обобщены результаты исследований III фазы по оценке пеметрекседа в составе поддерживающей терапии при немелкоклеточном раке легкого поздних стадий.
In Russia, over 57,000 new cases of malignant tumors of the trachea, bronchi, and lung were diagnosed in 2009, accounting for 19,8% of all cancers in men and 3,9% of all cancers in women. For most patients in Russia, these cancers are detected at a late stage (stage III – 32,4% and stage IV – 36,0%). Administration of maintenance therapy is one strategy to prolong response or the length of stable disease, resulting in improved survival for patients whose disease has not progressed after first-line induction therapy. This review will summarize the results of phase 3 studies of pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
1. Globocan 2008 Cancer Fact Sheet. http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheets/cancers/lung.asp
2. Davydov MI. Cancer statistics in Russia and CIS in 2009. J N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center RAMS 2011; 22 (3) (85 Suppl. 1).
3. D’Addario G, Früh M, Reck M et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010; 21 (Suppl. 5): v116–9.
4. Azzoli CG, Temin S, Aliff T et al. 2011 focused update of 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (28): 3825–31.
5. Gridelli C, Maione P, Rossi A et al. Potential treatment options after first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: maintenance treatment or early second-line? Oncol 2009; 14 (2): 137–47.
6. Grossi F, Aita M, Follador A et al. Sequential, alternating, and maintenance/consolidation chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the literature. Oncol 2007; 12 (4): 451–64.
7. Stinchcombe TE, Socinski MA. Treatment paradigms for advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer in the era of multiple lines of therapy. J Thorac Oncol 2009; 4 (2): 243–50.
8. Smith IE, O’Brien ME, Talbot DC et al. Duration of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial of three vs six courses of mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19 (5): 1336–43.
9. Socinski MA, Schell MJ, Peterman A et al. Phase III trial comparing a defined duration of therapy vs continuous therapy followed by second-line therapy in advanced-stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20 (5): 1335–43.
10. Belani CP, Barstis J, Perry MC et al. Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21 (15): 2933–9.
11. Westeel V, Quoix E, Moro-Sibilot D et al. Randomized study of maintenance vinorelbine in responders with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J National Cancer Institute 2005; 97 (7): 499–506.
12. Brodowicz T, Krzakowski M, Zwitter M et al. Cisplatin and gemcitabine first-line chemotherapy followed by maintenance gemcitabine or best supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III trial. Lung Cancer 2006; 52 (2): 155–63.
13. Park JO, Kim SW, Ahn JS et al. Phase III trial of two vs four additional cycles in patients who are nonprogressive after two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (33): 5233–9.
14. Fidias PM, Dakhil SR, Lyss AP et al. Phase III study of immediate compared with delayed docetaxel after front-line therapy with gemcitabine plus carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (4): 591–8.
15. Belani CP, Perry MC, La Rocca RV et al. Maintenance therapy (MT) with weekly paclitaxel improves outcome for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstr.) 2005; 23 (16s): 7143.
16. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer. New Engl J Med 2006; 355 (24): 2542–50.
17. Manegold C, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P et al. A phase III randomised study of first-line bevacizumab combined with cisplatin/gemcitabine (CG) in patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Presented at the 33rd ESMO Congress, September 12–16, 2008; Stockholm, Sweden. Abstr. LBA1. Ann Oncol 2008; 19 (Suppl. 8): 8.
18. Prior C, Oroszy S, Oberaigner W et al. Advanced non-small cell lung cancer: adjunctive interferon-g in induction and maintenance therapy. J Cancer Research Clin Oncol 1999; 125 (1): 42–6.
19. Belani CP, Ramalingam S, Perry MC et al. Randomized, phase III study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin vs standard every-3-weeks administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (3): 468–73.
20. Adjei AA. Pemetrexed (Alimta): a novel multitargeted antifolate agent. Exp Rev Anticancer Therapy 2003; 3 (2): 145–56.
21. Mendelsohn LG, Shih C, Chen VJ et al. Enzyme inhibition, polyglutamation, and the effect of LY231514 (MTA) on purine biosynthesis. Semin Oncol 1999; 26 (2 Suppl. 6): 42–7.
22. Shih C, Chen VJ, Gossett LS et al. LY231514, a pyrrolo [2,3-d] pyrimidine-based antifolate that inhibits multiple folate-requiring enzymes. Cancer Research 1997; 57 (6): 1116–23.
23. Chen VJ, Bewley JR, Andis SL et al. Preclinical cellular pharmacology of LY231514 (MTA): a comparison with methotrexate, LY309887 and raltitrexed for their effects on intracellular folate and nucleoside triphosphate pools in CCRF-CEM cells. Brit J Cancer 1998; 78 (Suppl. 3): 27–34.
24. Alimta (package insert). Indianapolis IN. Eli Lilly Company 2012.
25. Belani CP, Wu YL, Chen YM et al. Efficacy and safety of pemetrexed maintenance therapy vs best supportive care in patients from East Asia with advanced, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis of a global, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7: 567–73.
26. Belani CP, Brodowicz T, Ciuleanu TE et al. Quality of life in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer given maintenance treatment with pemetrexed vs placebo (H3E-MC-JMEN): results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13 (3): 292–9.
27. Ciuleanu T, Brodowicz T, Zielinski C et al. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care vs placebo plus best supportive care for non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet 2009; 374 (9699): 1432–40.
28. Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F, Dediu M et al. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care vs placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13 (3): 247–55.
29. Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F, Dediu M et al. PARAMOUNT: Final overall survival (OS) results of the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed (pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo (plb) plus BSC immediately following induction treatment with pem plus cisplatin (cis) for advanced nonsquamous (NS) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Meet Am Society Clin Oncol 2012; Chicago, Illinois. Abstr. LBA7507. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (Suppl. 18).
30. Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L et al. SATURN: A double-blind, randomized, phase III study of maintenance erlotinib vs placebo following non-progression with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11 (6): 521–9.
31. Edelman MJ, Le Chevalier T, Soria JC. Maintenance therapy and advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a skeptic’s view. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7 (9): 1331–6.
32. Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A et al. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial. Lancet 2009; 373 (9674): 1525–31.
33. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (21): 3543–51.
34. National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkR. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in OncologyTM: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 2009. http://www.nccn.org
35. Hensing TA, Schell MJ, Lee JH et al. Factors associated with the likelihood of receiving second line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2005; 47 (2): 253–9.
36. de Marinis F, Pereira JR, Fossella F et al. Lung Cancer Symptom Scale outcomes in relation to standard efficacy measures: an analysis of the phase III study of pemetrexed vs docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3 (1): 30–6.
Авторы
О.И.Кит1, Л.Ю.Владимирова1, Е.А.Шолохова2
1 Ростовский научно-исследовательский онкологический институт
2 Эли Лилли Восток С.А., Российское представительство, Москва