1. Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертензии. Российские рекомендации (четвертый пересмотр). Системные гипертензии. 2010; 3: 5–26.
2. Sica D, White W, Weber M et al. Comparison of the Novel Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Valsartan by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13: 467–72.
3. White WB, Weber MA, Sica D et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension 2011; 57 (3): 413–20.
4. 2013 Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Recommendations for the вiagnosis of Adult Hypertension, Assessment of Cardiovascular and other hypertension-associated risk, and attainment of therapeutic goals. Chronobiology International 2013; 30 (3): 355–410.
5. Rakugi H, Enya K, Sugiura K, Ikeda Y. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study. Hypertens Res 2012; 35 (5): 552–8.
6. Rakugi H, Kario К, Enya К et al. Effect of azilsartan versus candesartan on nocturnal blood pressure variation in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. Blood Press 2013; 22 (Suppl. 1): 22–8.