1. Kardys I, Kors JA, van der Meer IM, et al. Spatial QRS-T angle predicts cardiac death in a general population. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1357-64.
2. Сахнова Т.А., Блинова Е.В., Юрасова Е.С. Пространственный угол QRS-T и желудочковый градиент: диагностическое и прогностическое значение. Кардиологический вестн. 2017;2:70-5 [Sakhnova TA, Blinova EV, Yurasova ES. The spatial QRS-T angle and ventricular gradient: diagnostic and prognostic value. Kardiologicheskiy vestnik. 2017;2:70-5 (In Russ.)].
3. Zhang ZM, Prineas RJ, Case D, et al. Comparison of the prognostic significance of the electrocardiographic QRS/T angles in predicting incident coronary heart disease and total mortality (from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:844-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.104
4. Zhang X, Zhu Q, Zhu L, et al. Spatial/Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Cardiac Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136174
5. Kück K, Isaksen JL, Graff C, et al. Spatial QRS-T angle variants for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51(5):768-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.05.011
6. Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, et al. A wide QRS/T angle in bundle branch blocks is associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Electrocardiol. 2015;48(4):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.04.014
7. Lingman M, Hartford M, Karlsson T, et al. Value of the QRS-T area angle in improving the prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2016;218:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.005
8. Tereshchenko LG, Kim ED, Oehler A, et al. Electrophysiologic Substrate and Risk of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(11):3413-20. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015080916
9. Gleeson S, Liao YW, Dugo C, et al. ECG-derived spatial QRS-T angle is associated with ICD implantation, mortality and heart failure admissions in patients with LV systolic dysfunction. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0171069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171069
10. Lipponen JA, Kurl S, Laukkanen JA. Global electrical heterogeneity as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in men and women. Europace. 2018;20(11):1841-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy113
11. Skampardoni S, Green D, Hnatkova K, et al. QRS-T Angle Predicts Cardiac Risk and Correlates With Global Longitudinal Strain in Prevalent Hemodialysis Patients. Front Physiol. 2019;10:145. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00145
12. Li SN, Zhang XL, Cai GL, et al. Prognostic Significance of Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(16):1904-11. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.187844
13. Chua KC, Teodorescu C, Reinier K, et al. Wide QRS-T Angle on the 12-Lead ECG as a Predictor of Sudden Death Beyond the LV Ejection Fraction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(7):833-9. doi: 10.1111/jce.12989
14. May O, Graversen CB, Johansen MØ, Arildsen H. A large frontal QRS-T angle is a strong predictor of the long-term risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in the diabetic population. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(3):551-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.12.001
15. Gotsman I, Shauer A, Elizur Y, et al. Temporal changes in electrocardiographic frontal QRS-T angle and survival in patients with heart failure. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194520
16. Colluoglu T, Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, et al. The role of baseline and post-procedural frontal plane QRS-T angles for cardiac risk assessment in patients with acute STEMI. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018;23(5):e12558. doi: 10.1111/anec.12558
17. May O, Graversen CB, Johansen MØ, Arildsen H. The prognostic value of the frontal QRS-T angle is comparable to cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy regarding long-term mortality in people with diabetes. A population based study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;142:264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.018
18. Lazzeroni D, Bini M, Camaiora U, et al. Prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization or cardiac valve surgery. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51(6):967-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.028
19. Strebel I, Twerenbold R, Wussler D, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of the QRS-T angle, a 12-lead ECG marker quantifying heterogeneity of depolarization and repolarization, in patients with suspected non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2019;277:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.040
20. Kahraman S, Yilmaz E, Demir AR, et al. The prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Electrocardiol. 2019;55:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.05.003
21. Terho HK, Tikkanen JT, Kenttä TV, et al. Electrocardiogram as a predictor of sudden cardiac death in middle-aged subjects without a known cardiac disease. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2018;20:50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.08.002
22. Rautaharju PM, Kooperberg C, Larson JC, LaCroix A. Electrocardiographic predictors of incident congestive heart failure and all-cause mortality in postmenopausal women: The Women’s Health Initiative. Circulation. 2006;113:481-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.537415
23. Chen S, Hoss S, Zeniou V, et al. Electrocardiographic Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocarditis: The Importance of QRS-T Angle. J Card Fail. 2018;24(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.11.001
24. Fischer K, Marggraf M, Stark AW, et al. Association of ECG parameters with late gadolinium enhancement and outcome in patients with clinical suspicion of acute or subacute myocarditis referred for CMR imaging. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227134
25. Jensen JR, Kragholm K, Bødker KW, et al. Association between T-wave discordance and the development of heart failure in left bundle branch block patients: Results from the Copenhagen ECG study. J Electrocardiol. 2019;52:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.11.001
26. Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, et al. Electrocardiographic QRS-T angle and the risk of incident silent myocardial infarction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. J Electrocardiol. 2017;50(5):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.05.001
27. Dogan A, Kahraman S. Frontal QRS-T angle predicts coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2019;58:155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.11.042
28. Kahraman S, Kalkan AK, Turkyilmaz AB, et al. Frontal QRS-T angle is related with hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis in patients with single vessel disease. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;22(4):194-201. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.99692
29. Cortez D, Graw S, Mestroni L. In Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, the Spatial Peaks QRS-T Angle Identifies Those With Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39(8):459-63. doi: 10.1002/clc.22549
30. Jogu HR, O'Neal WT, Broughton ST, et al. Frontal QRS-T Angle and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017;22(2). doi: 10.1111/anec.12388
31. Pirinen J, Putaala J, Aro AL, et al. Resting 12-lead electrocardiogram reveals high-risk sources of cardioembolism in young adult ischemic stroke. Int J Cardiol. 2015;198:196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.095
32. Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, Eyuboglu M, et al. The importance of frontal QRS-T angle for predicting non-dipper status in hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;40(4):318-23. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2017.1377214
33. Cortez D, Schlegel TT, Ackerman MJ, Bos JM. ECG-derived spatial QRS-T angle is strongly associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Electrocardiol. 2017;50(2):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.10.001
34. Mahinrad S, Ferguson I, Macfarlane PW, et al. Spatial QRS-T Angle and Cognitive Decline in Older Subjects. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(1):279-89. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180633
35. Delhey L, Jin J, Thapa S, et al. The association of metabolic syndrome and QRS|T angle in US adults (NHANES III). Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020;25(1):e12678. doi: 10.1111/anec.12678
36. Dzikowicz DJ, Carey MG. Widened QRS-T Angle May Be a Measure of Poor Ventricular Stretch During Exercise Among On-duty Firefighters. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019;34(3):201-7. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000554
37. Thomas JA, Perez-Alday EA, Junell A, et al. Vectorcardiogram in athletes: The Sun Valley Ski Study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2019;24(3):e12614. doi: 10.1111/anec.12614
38. Kwon Y, Misialek JR, Duprez D, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and electrocardiographic QRS-T angle: The MESA study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018;23(6):e12579. doi: 10.1111/anec.12579
39. Gungor M, Celik M, Yalcinkaya E, et al. The Value of Frontal Planar QRS-T Angle in Patients without Angiographically Apparent Atherosclerosis. Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(2):125-31. doi: 10.1159/000453267
40. Kurisu S, Nitta K, Sumimoto Y, et al. Frontal QRS-T angle and World Health Organization classification for body mass index. Int J Cardiol. 2018;272:185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.060
41. Chen J, Lin Y, Yu J, et al. Changes of Virtual Planar QRS and T Vectors Derived from Holter in the Populations with and without Diabetes Mellitus. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21(1):69-81. doi: 10.1111/anec.12276
42. Aro AL, Reinier K, Rusinaru C, et al. Electrical risk score beyond the left ventricular ejection fraction: prediction of sudden cardiac death in the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(40):3017-25. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx331
43. Perez-Alday EA, Bender A, German D, et al. Dynamic predictive accuracy of electrocardiographic biomarkers of sudden cardiac death within a survival framework: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1234-9
44. Elffers TW, Trompet S, de Mutsert R, et al. Electrocardiographic Detection of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy; Adding Body Mass Index and Spatial QRS-T Angle: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cardiol Ther. 2019;8(2):345-56. doi: 10.1007/s40119-019-00151-9
45. Фролов А.В., Вайханская Т.Г., Мельникова О.П. и др. Индекс электрической нестабильности миокарда: клиническое и прогностическое значение. Рос. кардиологический журн. 2019;24(12):55-61 [Frolov AV, Vaykhanskaya TG, Melnikova OP, et al. Myocardial electrical instability score: clinical and prognostic significance. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal. 2019;24(12):55-61 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2019-12-55-61
46. Tereshchenko LG, Sotoodehnia N, Sitlani CM, et al. Genome-Wide Associations of Global Electrical Heterogeneity ECG Phenotype: The ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study and CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study). J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8). pii: e008160. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008160
47. Biering-Sørensen T, Kabir M, Waks JW, et al. Global ECG Measures and Cardiac Structure and Function: The ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(3):e005961. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005961

________________________________________________

1. Kardys I, Kors JA, van der Meer IM, et al. Spatial QRS-T angle predicts cardiac death in a general population. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1357-64.
2. Sakhnova TA, Blinova EV, Yurasova ES. The spatial QRS-T angle and ventricular gradient: diagnostic and prognostic value. Kardiologicheskiy vestnik. 2017;2:70-5 (In Russ.)
3. Zhang ZM, Prineas RJ, Case D, et al. Comparison of the prognostic significance of the electrocardiographic QRS/T angles in predicting incident coronary heart disease and total mortality (from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:844-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.104
4. Zhang X, Zhu Q, Zhu L, et al. Spatial/Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Cardiac Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136174
5. Kück K, Isaksen JL, Graff C, et al. Spatial QRS-T angle variants for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51(5):768-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.05.011
6. Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, et al. A wide QRS/T angle in bundle branch blocks is associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Electrocardiol. 2015;48(4):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.04.014
7. Lingman M, Hartford M, Karlsson T, et al. Value of the QRS-T area angle in improving the prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2016;218:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.005
8. Tereshchenko LG, Kim ED, Oehler A, et al. Electrophysiologic Substrate and Risk of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(11):3413-20. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015080916
9. Gleeson S, Liao YW, Dugo C, et al. ECG-derived spatial QRS-T angle is associated with ICD implantation, mortality and heart failure admissions in patients with LV systolic dysfunction. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0171069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171069
10. Lipponen JA, Kurl S, Laukkanen JA. Global electrical heterogeneity as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in men and women. Europace. 2018;20(11):1841-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy113
11. Skampardoni S, Green D, Hnatkova K, et al. QRS-T Angle Predicts Cardiac Risk and Correlates With Global Longitudinal Strain in Prevalent Hemodialysis Patients. Front Physiol. 2019;10:145. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00145
12. Li SN, Zhang XL, Cai GL, et al. Prognostic Significance of Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(16):1904-11. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.187844
13. Chua KC, Teodorescu C, Reinier K, et al. Wide QRS-T Angle on the 12-Lead ECG as a Predictor of Sudden Death Beyond the LV Ejection Fraction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(7):833-9. doi: 10.1111/jce.12989
14. May O, Graversen CB, Johansen MØ, Arildsen H. A large frontal QRS-T angle is a strong predictor of the long-term risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in the diabetic population. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(3):551-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.12.001
15. Gotsman I, Shauer A, Elizur Y, et al. Temporal changes in electrocardiographic frontal QRS-T angle and survival in patients with heart failure. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194520
16. Colluoglu T, Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, et al. The role of baseline and post-procedural frontal plane QRS-T angles for cardiac risk assessment in patients with acute STEMI. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018;23(5):e12558. doi: 10.1111/anec.12558
17. May O, Graversen CB, Johansen MØ, Arildsen H. The prognostic value of the frontal QRS-T angle is comparable to cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy regarding long-term mortality in people with diabetes. A population based study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;142:264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.018
18. Lazzeroni D, Bini M, Camaiora U, et al. Prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization or cardiac valve surgery. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51(6):967-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.028
19. Strebel I, Twerenbold R, Wussler D, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of the QRS-T angle, a 12-lead ECG marker quantifying heterogeneity of depolarization and repolarization, in patients with suspected non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2019;277:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.040
20. Kahraman S, Yilmaz E, Demir AR, et al. The prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Electrocardiol. 2019;55:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.05.003
21. Terho HK, Tikkanen JT, Kenttä TV, et al. Electrocardiogram as a predictor of sudden cardiac death in middle-aged subjects without a known cardiac disease. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2018;20:50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.08.002
22. Rautaharju PM, Kooperberg C, Larson JC, LaCroix A. Electrocardiographic predictors of incident congestive heart failure and all-cause mortality in postmenopausal women: The Women’s Health Initiative. Circulation. 2006;113:481-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.537415
23. Chen S, Hoss S, Zeniou V, et al. Electrocardiographic Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocarditis: The Importance of QRS-T Angle. J Card Fail. 2018;24(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.11.001
24. Fischer K, Marggraf M, Stark AW, et al. Association of ECG parameters with late gadolinium enhancement and outcome in patients with clinical suspicion of acute or subacute myocarditis referred for CMR imaging. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227134
25. Jensen JR, Kragholm K, Bødker KW, et al. Association between T-wave discordance and the development of heart failure in left bundle branch block patients: Results from the Copenhagen ECG study. J Electrocardiol. 2019;52:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.11.001
26. Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, et al. Electrocardiographic QRS-T angle and the risk of incident silent myocardial infarction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. J Electrocardiol. 2017;50(5):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.05.001
27. Dogan A, Kahraman S. Frontal QRS-T angle predicts coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2019;58:155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.11.042
28. Kahraman S, Kalkan AK, Turkyilmaz AB, et al. Frontal QRS-T angle is related with hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis in patients with single vessel disease. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;22(4):194-201. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.99692
29. Cortez D, Graw S, Mestroni L. In Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, the Spatial Peaks QRS-T Angle Identifies Those With Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39(8):459-63. doi: 10.1002/clc.22549
30. Jogu HR, O'Neal WT, Broughton ST, et al. Frontal QRS-T Angle and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017;22(2). doi: 10.1111/anec.12388
31. Pirinen J, Putaala J, Aro AL, et al. Resting 12-lead electrocardiogram reveals high-risk sources of cardioembolism in young adult ischemic stroke. Int J Cardiol. 2015;198:196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.095
32. Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, Eyuboglu M, et al. The importance of frontal QRS-T angle for predicting non-dipper status in hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;40(4):318-23. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2017.1377214
33. Cortez D, Schlegel TT, Ackerman MJ, Bos JM. ECG-derived spatial QRS-T angle is strongly associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Electrocardiol. 2017;50(2):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.10.001
34. Mahinrad S, Ferguson I, Macfarlane PW, et al. Spatial QRS-T Angle and Cognitive Decline in Older Subjects. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(1):279-89. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180633
35. Delhey L, Jin J, Thapa S, et al. The association of metabolic syndrome and QRS|T angle in US adults (NHANES III). Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020;25(1):e12678. doi: 10.1111/anec.12678
36. Dzikowicz DJ, Carey MG. Widened QRS-T Angle May Be a Measure of Poor Ventricular Stretch During Exercise Among On-duty Firefighters. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019;34(3):201-7. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000554
37. Thomas JA, Perez-Alday EA, Junell A, et al. Vectorcardiogram in athletes: The Sun Valley Ski Study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2019;24(3):e12614. doi: 10.1111/anec.12614
38. Kwon Y, Misialek JR, Duprez D, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and electrocardiographic QRS-T angle: The MESA study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018;23(6):e12579. doi: 10.1111/anec.12579
39. Gungor M, Celik M, Yalcinkaya E, et al. The Value of Frontal Planar QRS-T Angle in Patients without Angiographically Apparent Atherosclerosis. Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(2):125-31. doi: 10.1159/000453267
40. Kurisu S, Nitta K, Sumimoto Y, et al. Frontal QRS-T angle and World Health Organization classification for body mass index. Int J Cardiol. 2018;272:185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.060
41. Chen J, Lin Y, Yu J, et al. Changes of Virtual Planar QRS and T Vectors Derived from Holter in the Populations with and without Diabetes Mellitus. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21(1):69-81. doi: 10.1111/anec.12276
42. Aro AL, Reinier K, Rusinaru C, et al. Electrical risk score beyond the left ventricular ejection fraction: prediction of sudden cardiac death in the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(40):3017-25. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx331
43. Perez-Alday EA, Bender A, German D, et al. Dynamic predictive accuracy of electrocardiographic biomarkers of sudden cardiac death within a survival framework: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1234-9
44. Elffers TW, Trompet S, de Mutsert R, et al. Electrocardiographic Detection of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy; Adding Body Mass Index and Spatial QRS-T Angle: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cardiol Ther. 2019;8(2):345-56. doi: 10.1007/s40119-019-00151-9
45. Frolov AV, Vaykhanskaya TG, Melnikova OP, et al. Myocardial electrical instability score: clinical and prognostic significance. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal. 2019;24(12):55-61 (In Russ.) doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2019-12-55-61
46. Tereshchenko LG, Sotoodehnia N, Sitlani CM, et al. Genome-Wide Associations of Global Electrical Heterogeneity ECG Phenotype: The ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study and CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study). J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8). pii: e008160. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008160
47. Biering-Sørensen T, Kabir M, Waks JW, et al. Global ECG Measures and Cardiac Structure and Function: The ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(3):e005961. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005961

Е.В. Блинова, Т.А. Сахнова, Е.С. Юрасова

ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр кардиологии» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия

________________________________________________

E.V. Blinova, T.A. Sakhnova, E.S. Yurasova

National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Moscow, Russia